香港不太可能的希望:它的未来仍然是它的过去

IF 0.6 Q4 REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING
J. Eagleton
{"title":"香港不太可能的希望:它的未来仍然是它的过去","authors":"J. Eagleton","doi":"10.6531/JFS.202009_25(1).0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thinker Slavoj Zisek (1989, pp. 274-5) tells us that the future is the "supreme object of ideology" and that it is "without form, shape or color: it demands yet exceeds all figuration". Beijing seems to be privileging a future where Hong Kong is increasingly assimilated into the mainland despite promising a high degree of autonomy as part of the "One Country, Two Systems" framework; Hong Kong however privileges a future that maintains this high degree of autonomy. The Extradition Bill of 2019, which led to massive protests, was seen by a broad section of the community as a "tipping point" in Hong Kong's full integration into China. In this essay, the discussion revolves around the date of 2047, the end point of "50 years no change" to Hong Kong's systems as promised in its Basic Law and how the young, the CE, and Xi Jingping see the future. It will be argued that critical elements in Hong Kong see the city as being apart from China, rather than a part of it, a situation that China feels should no longer be the case.","PeriodicalId":44849,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Futures Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hong Kong's Unlikely Hope:That Its Future remains Its Past\",\"authors\":\"J. Eagleton\",\"doi\":\"10.6531/JFS.202009_25(1).0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The thinker Slavoj Zisek (1989, pp. 274-5) tells us that the future is the "supreme object of ideology" and that it is "without form, shape or color: it demands yet exceeds all figuration". Beijing seems to be privileging a future where Hong Kong is increasingly assimilated into the mainland despite promising a high degree of autonomy as part of the "One Country, Two Systems" framework; Hong Kong however privileges a future that maintains this high degree of autonomy. The Extradition Bill of 2019, which led to massive protests, was seen by a broad section of the community as a "tipping point" in Hong Kong's full integration into China. In this essay, the discussion revolves around the date of 2047, the end point of "50 years no change" to Hong Kong's systems as promised in its Basic Law and how the young, the CE, and Xi Jingping see the future. It will be argued that critical elements in Hong Kong see the city as being apart from China, rather than a part of it, a situation that China feels should no longer be the case.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Futures Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Futures Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.202009_25(1).0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Futures Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.202009_25(1).0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

思想家斯拉沃伊·齐塞克(1989,第274-5页)告诉我们,未来是“意识形态的最高对象”,它“没有形式、形状或色彩:它要求但又超越了所有的形象”。尽管承诺在“一国两制”框架下给予香港高度自治,但北京似乎在优先考虑香港日益融入内地的未来;然而,香港的未来将保持这种高度自治。2019年的《逃犯条例》引发了大规模抗议,被香港社会广泛视为香港全面融入中国的“转折点”。有人会说,香港的关键因素认为香港与中国是分离的,而不是中国的一部分,中国认为这种情况不应该再发生了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hong Kong's Unlikely Hope:That Its Future remains Its Past
The thinker Slavoj Zisek (1989, pp. 274-5) tells us that the future is the "supreme object of ideology" and that it is "without form, shape or color: it demands yet exceeds all figuration". Beijing seems to be privileging a future where Hong Kong is increasingly assimilated into the mainland despite promising a high degree of autonomy as part of the "One Country, Two Systems" framework; Hong Kong however privileges a future that maintains this high degree of autonomy. The Extradition Bill of 2019, which led to massive protests, was seen by a broad section of the community as a "tipping point" in Hong Kong's full integration into China. In this essay, the discussion revolves around the date of 2047, the end point of "50 years no change" to Hong Kong's systems as promised in its Basic Law and how the young, the CE, and Xi Jingping see the future. It will be argued that critical elements in Hong Kong see the city as being apart from China, rather than a part of it, a situation that China feels should no longer be the case.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Futures Studies
Journal of Futures Studies REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Futures Studies is a globally-oriented, trans-disciplinary referred journal. Its mission is to develop high-quality, futures-oriented research and thinking based on the evolving knowledge base of Futures Studies. Articles accepted for publication are expected to show an in-depth understanding of the field"s dimensions, content, research perspectives and methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信