基于机器学习和深度学习算法的入侵检测系统的比较分析

Q2 Computer Science
Johan Note, Maaruf Ali
{"title":"基于机器学习和深度学习算法的入侵检测系统的比较分析","authors":"Johan Note, Maaruf Ali","doi":"10.33166/aetic.2022.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attacks against computer networks, “cyber-attacks”, are now common place affecting almost every Internet connected device on a daily basis. Organisations are now using machine learning and deep learning to thwart these types of attacks for their effectiveness without the need for human intervention. Machine learning offers the biggest advantage in their ability to detect, curtail, prevent, recover and even deal with untrained types of attacks without being explicitly programmed. This research will show the many different types of algorithms that are employed to fight against the different types of cyber-attacks, which are also explained. The classification algorithms, their implementation, accuracy and testing time are presented. The algorithms employed for this experiment were the Gaussian Naïve-Bayes algorithm, Logistic Regression Algorithm, SVM (Support Vector Machine) Algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm, Decision Tree Algorithm, Random Forest Algorithm, Gradient Boosting Algorithm, K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm, ANN (Artificial Neural Network) (here we also employed the Multilevel Perceptron Algorithm), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Algorithm and the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Algorithm. The study concluded that amongst the various machine learning algorithms, the Logistic Regression and Decision tree classifiers all took a very short time to be implemented giving an accuracy of over 90% for malware detection inside various test datasets. The Gaussian Naïve-Bayes classifier, though fast to implement, only gave an accuracy between 51-88%. The Multilevel Perceptron, non-linear SVM and Gradient Boosting algorithms all took a very long time to be implemented. The algorithm that performed with the greatest accuracy was the Random Forest Classification algorithm.","PeriodicalId":36440,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection System Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Johan Note, Maaruf Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.33166/aetic.2022.03.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Attacks against computer networks, “cyber-attacks”, are now common place affecting almost every Internet connected device on a daily basis. Organisations are now using machine learning and deep learning to thwart these types of attacks for their effectiveness without the need for human intervention. Machine learning offers the biggest advantage in their ability to detect, curtail, prevent, recover and even deal with untrained types of attacks without being explicitly programmed. This research will show the many different types of algorithms that are employed to fight against the different types of cyber-attacks, which are also explained. The classification algorithms, their implementation, accuracy and testing time are presented. The algorithms employed for this experiment were the Gaussian Naïve-Bayes algorithm, Logistic Regression Algorithm, SVM (Support Vector Machine) Algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm, Decision Tree Algorithm, Random Forest Algorithm, Gradient Boosting Algorithm, K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm, ANN (Artificial Neural Network) (here we also employed the Multilevel Perceptron Algorithm), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Algorithm and the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Algorithm. The study concluded that amongst the various machine learning algorithms, the Logistic Regression and Decision tree classifiers all took a very short time to be implemented giving an accuracy of over 90% for malware detection inside various test datasets. The Gaussian Naïve-Bayes classifier, though fast to implement, only gave an accuracy between 51-88%. The Multilevel Perceptron, non-linear SVM and Gradient Boosting algorithms all took a very long time to be implemented. The algorithm that performed with the greatest accuracy was the Random Forest Classification algorithm.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33166/aetic.2022.03.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33166/aetic.2022.03.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

针对计算机网络的攻击,即“网络攻击”,现在几乎每天都会影响到每一台联网设备。组织现在正在使用机器学习和深度学习来挫败这些类型的攻击,因为它们的有效性不需要人工干预。机器学习的最大优势在于,它能够在没有明确编程的情况下检测、减少、预防、恢复甚至处理未经训练的攻击类型。这项研究将展示用于对抗不同类型网络攻击的许多不同类型的算法,并对其进行了解释。介绍了分类算法及其实现、准确性和测试时间。本实验采用的算法有高斯朴素贝叶斯算法、逻辑回归算法、SVM(支持向量机)算法、随机梯度下降算法、决策树算法、随机森林算法、梯度提升算法、K-近邻算法、ANN(人工神经网络)(这里我们还采用了多级感知器算法),卷积神经网络(CNN)算法和递归神经网络(RNN)算法。该研究得出的结论是,在各种机器学习算法中,逻辑回归和决策树分类器的实现时间都很短,在各种测试数据集中的恶意软件检测准确率超过90%。高斯朴素贝叶斯分类器虽然实现速度快,但其准确率仅在51-88%之间。多级感知器、非线性SVM和梯度提升算法都需要很长的时间才能实现。执行得最准确的算法是随机森林分类算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Intrusion Detection System Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms
Attacks against computer networks, “cyber-attacks”, are now common place affecting almost every Internet connected device on a daily basis. Organisations are now using machine learning and deep learning to thwart these types of attacks for their effectiveness without the need for human intervention. Machine learning offers the biggest advantage in their ability to detect, curtail, prevent, recover and even deal with untrained types of attacks without being explicitly programmed. This research will show the many different types of algorithms that are employed to fight against the different types of cyber-attacks, which are also explained. The classification algorithms, their implementation, accuracy and testing time are presented. The algorithms employed for this experiment were the Gaussian Naïve-Bayes algorithm, Logistic Regression Algorithm, SVM (Support Vector Machine) Algorithm, Stochastic Gradient Descent Algorithm, Decision Tree Algorithm, Random Forest Algorithm, Gradient Boosting Algorithm, K-Nearest Neighbour Algorithm, ANN (Artificial Neural Network) (here we also employed the Multilevel Perceptron Algorithm), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Algorithm and the Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) Algorithm. The study concluded that amongst the various machine learning algorithms, the Logistic Regression and Decision tree classifiers all took a very short time to be implemented giving an accuracy of over 90% for malware detection inside various test datasets. The Gaussian Naïve-Bayes classifier, though fast to implement, only gave an accuracy between 51-88%. The Multilevel Perceptron, non-linear SVM and Gradient Boosting algorithms all took a very long time to be implemented. The algorithm that performed with the greatest accuracy was the Random Forest Classification algorithm.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing
Annals of Emerging Technologies in Computing Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信