对肯尼亚生活实验室可持续性的评估

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Mary Auma Ondiek, C. Moturi
{"title":"对肯尼亚生活实验室可持续性的评估","authors":"Mary Auma Ondiek, C. Moturi","doi":"10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThere has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nBased on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya.\n\n\nFindings\nThe research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya\n","PeriodicalId":42220,"journal":{"name":"Innovation & Management Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya\",\"authors\":\"Mary Auma Ondiek, C. Moturi\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThere has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nBased on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":42220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation & Management Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation & Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation & Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/inmr-08-2018-0058","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在肯尼亚的生活实验室中,失败率很高,导致预期的结果没有完全实现。本文旨在评估肯尼亚生活实验室的可持续性。设计/方法/途径基于可持续发展评估框架的四资本方法,通过对肯尼亚25个生活实验室的创新者、用户和员工进行访谈和问卷调查,收集数据。研究发现,一些创新者对生活实验室不熟悉,生活实验室具有创新性,为未来的生存做好了准备,一些实验室对如何追求未来的环境有战略规划,并制定了选择合适的人进行孵化的方法,无法从主办机构获得足够的资金,对运营的监管层面的知识有限。提出的模型可以推广到发展中国家的其他生活实验室。研究的局限性/意义这项研究是在内罗毕进行的,那里是大多数生活实验室的所在地。实践意义本研究强调了创新过程中的用户参与。有必要扩大生活实验室的能力,以容纳更多的人,以确保一次支持更多的创新。负责生活实验室的高级管理人员应提高监督水平,以确保实验室的孵化工作有效,并将主办单位对实验室的支持制度化,以确保实验室的持续发展和扩大。原创性/价值本研究的发现对研究界、决策者和决策者都有价值,因为它试图记录肯尼亚活体实验室的现状
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An assessment of the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya
Purpose There has been a high rate of failure among the Living Labs in Kenya resulting in the expected outcomes not fully realized. This paper aims to assess the sustainability of Living Labs in Kenya. Design/methodology/approach Based on the four capital method of sustainable development evaluation framework, data were collected through interviews and questionnaires from innovators, users and employees among the 25 living labs in Kenya. Findings The research found that some innovators are not familiar with the living labs, the living labs are innovative and prepared to survive in future, some labs have strategic plans on how to pursue future environment and have developed ways of choosing right people to incubate, inability to get enough funding from the host organizations and limited knowledge on the supervision level of the operations. A model is proposed that can be generalized to other living labs in developing countries. Research limitations/implications The study was done in Nairobi where most of the living labs are situated. Practical implications The study concludes by emphasizing on the user involvement during innovation process. There is need to expand the capacities of living labs to accommodate more people to ensure more innovations are supported at a time. The senior managers in charge of the living labs should increase the level of supervision to ensure that the labs are effective in their incubation efforts and institutionalize support of the host organization to the labs to ensure continued growth and expansion. Originality/value The findings of this study are of value to research community, the decision and policymakers as it seeks to document the current status of the living labs in the Kenya
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信