根据托马斯·阿奎那,单数中普遍性的基础:共同的本质、相似性和/或理念?

Luiz Marcos Da Silva Filho
{"title":"根据托马斯·阿奎那,单数中普遍性的基础:共同的本质、相似性和/或理念?","authors":"Luiz Marcos Da Silva Filho","doi":"10.5380/dp.v18i1-ev.90328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I aim to analyze in Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy (i) if the “absolutely considered essence” (or “common nature”) can play a role of basis or ground of the universal in the singular thing or individual and (ii) if it is simultaneously obtained with the intelligible abstraction of the essence that joins the intention of universality or by a “double abstraction”. Additionally, I will try to consider if the “absolutely considered essence” requires or not from Aquinas an appropriation of certain theory of ideas, and whether the association between this essence and ideas is something required to justify the “similitude” among the universals and the individuals. Finally, I will recall some different receptions of Thomas Aquinas in the 20th and 21st centuries, most of them used to frame his thought under so distinct basis such as direct realism, essentialism, indirect realism, representationalism etc.","PeriodicalId":34455,"journal":{"name":"DoisPontos","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ground of the Universal in the Singular According to Thomas Aquinas: Common Nature, Similitude, and/or Idea?\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Marcos Da Silva Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/dp.v18i1-ev.90328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I aim to analyze in Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy (i) if the “absolutely considered essence” (or “common nature”) can play a role of basis or ground of the universal in the singular thing or individual and (ii) if it is simultaneously obtained with the intelligible abstraction of the essence that joins the intention of universality or by a “double abstraction”. Additionally, I will try to consider if the “absolutely considered essence” requires or not from Aquinas an appropriation of certain theory of ideas, and whether the association between this essence and ideas is something required to justify the “similitude” among the universals and the individuals. Finally, I will recall some different receptions of Thomas Aquinas in the 20th and 21st centuries, most of them used to frame his thought under so distinct basis such as direct realism, essentialism, indirect realism, representationalism etc.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DoisPontos\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DoisPontos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v18i1-ev.90328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DoisPontos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v18i1-ev.90328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我的目的是分析托马斯·阿奎那的哲学:(I)“绝对考虑的本质”(或“共同的本质”)是否可以在单一的事物或个人中发挥普遍性的基础或基础的作用;(ii)它是否与与普遍性意图相结合的可理解的本质抽象同时获得,或通过“双重抽象”获得。此外,我将尝试考虑“绝对考虑的本质”是否需要阿奎那对某些思想理论的挪用,以及这种本质和思想之间的联系是否是证明普遍性和个体之间“相似性”所必需的。最后,我将回顾托马斯·阿奎那在20世纪和21世纪的一些不同的接受,其中大多数都是在直接现实主义、本质主义、间接现实主义、具象主义等独特的基础上构建他的思想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ground of the Universal in the Singular According to Thomas Aquinas: Common Nature, Similitude, and/or Idea?
In this article, I aim to analyze in Thomas Aquinas’s philosophy (i) if the “absolutely considered essence” (or “common nature”) can play a role of basis or ground of the universal in the singular thing or individual and (ii) if it is simultaneously obtained with the intelligible abstraction of the essence that joins the intention of universality or by a “double abstraction”. Additionally, I will try to consider if the “absolutely considered essence” requires or not from Aquinas an appropriation of certain theory of ideas, and whether the association between this essence and ideas is something required to justify the “similitude” among the universals and the individuals. Finally, I will recall some different receptions of Thomas Aquinas in the 20th and 21st centuries, most of them used to frame his thought under so distinct basis such as direct realism, essentialism, indirect realism, representationalism etc.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信