第一次世界大战前后自然科学研究文章的一些语言特征

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
David Banks
{"title":"第一次世界大战前后自然科学研究文章的一些语言特征","authors":"David Banks","doi":"10.1075/langct.20011.ban","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous studies suggest that in times of great turbulence scientific writing becomes more conservative. In order\n to see whether this is true of the period of the First World War, a sample of research articles in the field of the physical\n sciences for the years 1900, 1910, 1920 and 1930 was studied. Features relating to process types, passives, first person pronouns,\n themes and nominalisation were considered. This showed that while there was little evidence for the initial conjecture, it was\n frequently the case that the direction of change altered during the period 1910 to 1920. This change was often maintained in the\n following decade. Thus, there are significant changes occurring in the period 1910 to 1920 which warrant further study.","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some linguistic features of the physical sciences research article before, during and after the First World\\n War\",\"authors\":\"David Banks\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/langct.20011.ban\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Previous studies suggest that in times of great turbulence scientific writing becomes more conservative. In order\\n to see whether this is true of the period of the First World War, a sample of research articles in the field of the physical\\n sciences for the years 1900, 1910, 1920 and 1930 was studied. Features relating to process types, passives, first person pronouns,\\n themes and nominalisation were considered. This showed that while there was little evidence for the initial conjecture, it was\\n frequently the case that the direction of change altered during the period 1910 to 1920. This change was often maintained in the\\n following decade. Thus, there are significant changes occurring in the period 1910 to 1920 which warrant further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.20011.ban\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.20011.ban","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,在大动荡时期,科学写作会变得更加保守。为了了解第一次世界大战期间的情况是否属实,我们对1900年、1910年、1920年和1930年物理科学领域的研究文章进行了抽样研究。考察了过程类型、被动语态、第一人称代词、主位和名词化的特点。这表明,虽然最初的推测几乎没有证据,但在1910年至1920年期间,变化的方向经常发生变化。在接下来的十年里,这种变化经常得到维持。因此,1910年至1920年期间发生了重大变化,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some linguistic features of the physical sciences research article before, during and after the First World War
Previous studies suggest that in times of great turbulence scientific writing becomes more conservative. In order to see whether this is true of the period of the First World War, a sample of research articles in the field of the physical sciences for the years 1900, 1910, 1920 and 1930 was studied. Features relating to process types, passives, first person pronouns, themes and nominalisation were considered. This showed that while there was little evidence for the initial conjecture, it was frequently the case that the direction of change altered during the period 1910 to 1920. This change was often maintained in the following decade. Thus, there are significant changes occurring in the period 1910 to 1920 which warrant further study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信