《掌权的男孩》

IF 0.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal Pub Date : 2019-06-01 DOI:10.3167/bhs.2019.120104

Katrín Ólafsdóttir, J. Kjaran

{"title":"《掌权的男孩》","authors":"Katrín Ólafsdóttir, J. Kjaran","doi":"10.3167/bhs.2019.120104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual consent determines if sex is consensual, but the concept is under-researched globally. In this article, we focus on heterosexual young men and how they negotiate sex and consent. We draw on peer group interviews to understand how young men are constituted by the dominant discourses at play in shaping their realities. We have identified two different discourses that inform consent, the discourse of consent (based on legal, educational, and grassroots discourses), and the discourse of heterosexuality (based on the heterosexual script, porn, and gender roles) resulting in conflicting messages for boys. They are supposed to take responsibility for sex to be consensual as well as being gentle partners, but at the same time, the heterosexual discourse itself produces power imbalances in sex and dating.","PeriodicalId":42228,"journal":{"name":"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/bhs.2019.120104","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Boys in Power\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Katrín Ólafsdóttir, J. Kjaran\",\"doi\":\"10.3167/bhs.2019.120104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sexual consent determines if sex is consensual, but the concept is under-researched globally. In this article, we focus on heterosexual young men and how they negotiate sex and consent. We draw on peer group interviews to understand how young men are constituted by the dominant discourses at play in shaping their realities. We have identified two different discourses that inform consent, the discourse of consent (based on legal, educational, and grassroots discourses), and the discourse of heterosexuality (based on the heterosexual script, porn, and gender roles) resulting in conflicting messages for boys. They are supposed to take responsibility for sex to be consensual as well as being gentle partners, but at the same time, the heterosexual discourse itself produces power imbalances in sex and dating.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/bhs.2019.120104\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3167/bhs.2019.120104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/bhs.2019.120104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

性同意决定了性行为是否是双方自愿的，但这一概念在全球范围内研究不足。在这篇文章中，我们关注异性恋年轻男性以及他们如何协商性行为和同意。我们利用同伴小组访谈来了解年轻人是如何被塑造他们现实的主导话语所构成的。我们已经确定了两种不同的话语，即同意话语（基于法律、教育和草根话语）和异性恋话语（基于异性恋剧本、色情和性别角色），这两种话语会给男孩带来相互冲突的信息。他们应该为双方自愿的性行为以及温柔的伴侣承担责任，但与此同时，异性恋话语本身也会在性和约会中产生权力失衡。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

"Boys in Power"

Sexual consent determines if sex is consensual, but the concept is under-researched globally. In this article, we focus on heterosexual young men and how they negotiate sex and consent. We draw on peer group interviews to understand how young men are constituted by the dominant discourses at play in shaping their realities. We have identified two different discourses that inform consent, the discourse of consent (based on legal, educational, and grassroots discourses), and the discourse of heterosexuality (based on the heterosexual script, porn, and gender roles) resulting in conflicting messages for boys. They are supposed to take responsibility for sex to be consensual as well as being gentle partners, but at the same time, the heterosexual discourse itself produces power imbalances in sex and dating.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Boyhood Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

14.30%

发文量