资产市场封闭与新帕西尼蒂定理

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
{"title":"资产市场封闭与新帕西尼蒂定理","authors":"","doi":"10.4337/roke.2023.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note comments on a corollary of the neo-Pasinetti Theorem – the dependence of national saving on corporate saving – as elaborated by Peter Skott in his model of corporate capitalism. The central insight is that, under an alternative closure that treats the wealth effect conveyed by the q-ratio as a mechanism for coordinating corporate investment and national saving, this corollary will not go through. An increase in corporate retentions will not affect the q-ratio or national saving; it will reduce the dividend yield and increase the rate of capital gains. This creates the impression that equity-owning households have ‘pierced the corporate veil’ when in fact this outcome follows from the logic of the corporate capitalist system under the alternative closure. The note thus qualifies the neo-Pasinetti result by showing that it depends on the choice of closure.","PeriodicalId":45671,"journal":{"name":"Review of Keynesian Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asset market closure and the neo-Pasinetti theorem\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/roke.2023.01.06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note comments on a corollary of the neo-Pasinetti Theorem – the dependence of national saving on corporate saving – as elaborated by Peter Skott in his model of corporate capitalism. The central insight is that, under an alternative closure that treats the wealth effect conveyed by the q-ratio as a mechanism for coordinating corporate investment and national saving, this corollary will not go through. An increase in corporate retentions will not affect the q-ratio or national saving; it will reduce the dividend yield and increase the rate of capital gains. This creates the impression that equity-owning households have ‘pierced the corporate veil’ when in fact this outcome follows from the logic of the corporate capitalist system under the alternative closure. The note thus qualifies the neo-Pasinetti result by showing that it depends on the choice of closure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Keynesian Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2023.01.06\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Keynesian Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2023.01.06","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本注释评论了新帕西尼蒂定理的一个推论——国家储蓄对企业储蓄的依赖——正如彼得·斯科特在其企业资本主义模型中所阐述的那样。核心见解是,在另一种封闭方式下,将q比率传递的财富效应视为协调企业投资和国家储蓄的机制,这一必然结果将不会实现。企业留存率的增加不会影响q比率或国民储蓄;这将降低股息率,提高资本收益率。这给人的印象是,拥有股权的家庭已经“揭开了企业的面纱”,而事实上,这一结果遵循了另类封闭下的企业资本主义制度的逻辑。因此,注释通过表明它取决于闭包的选择来限定新Pasinetti结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asset market closure and the neo-Pasinetti theorem
This note comments on a corollary of the neo-Pasinetti Theorem – the dependence of national saving on corporate saving – as elaborated by Peter Skott in his model of corporate capitalism. The central insight is that, under an alternative closure that treats the wealth effect conveyed by the q-ratio as a mechanism for coordinating corporate investment and national saving, this corollary will not go through. An increase in corporate retentions will not affect the q-ratio or national saving; it will reduce the dividend yield and increase the rate of capital gains. This creates the impression that equity-owning households have ‘pierced the corporate veil’ when in fact this outcome follows from the logic of the corporate capitalist system under the alternative closure. The note thus qualifies the neo-Pasinetti result by showing that it depends on the choice of closure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Review of Keynesian Economics (ROKE) is dedicated to the promotion of research in Keynesian economics. Not only does that include Keynesian ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. The journal provides a forum for developing and disseminating Keynesian ideas, and intends to encourage critical exchange with other macroeconomic paradigms. The journal is dedicated to the development of Keynesian theory and policy. In our view, Keynesian theory should hold a similar place in economics to that held by the theory of evolution in biology. Many individual economists still work within the Keynesian paradigm, but intellectual success demands institutional support that can leverage those individual efforts. The journal offers such support by providing a forum for developing and sharing Keynesian ideas. Not only does that include ideas about macroeconomic theory and policy, it also extends to microeconomic and meso-economic analysis and relevant empirical and historical research. We see a bright future for the Keynesian approach to macroeconomics and invite the economics profession to join us by subscribing to the journal and submitting manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信