基于2015年PISA的印尼和新加坡差异:五因素学生对科学教育的认知

J. Arlinwibowo, H. Kistoro, H. Retnawati, G. Kassymova, B. Kenzhaliyev
{"title":"基于2015年PISA的印尼和新加坡差异:五因素学生对科学教育的认知","authors":"J. Arlinwibowo, H. Kistoro, H. Retnawati, G. Kassymova, B. Kenzhaliyev","doi":"10.21831/jipi.v6i1.32637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a neighbouring country whose location is very close, there is a unique fact where the results of the PISA study show very different results between Indonesia and Singapore. Students' perceptions of learning have an important role to detect the quality of learning. Thus, this study aims to determine the factors of student perception of natural science learning and the differences between the two countries based on these factors. The sample in this study were 5870 Indonesian students and 5272 Singaporean students who took the 2015 PISA survey. The research data were the results of the PISA survey (codes ST098, ST100, ST103, and ST104) regarding student perception of natural science learning. The data analysis technique used is Principal Component Analysis to detect factors and Discriminant Analysis to show differences between the two countries. Students' perceptions of science learning in Singapore and Indonesia can be classified into five factors: Practicum, Assistant, Explorative, Counseling, and Collaborative. Based on these factors, there are differences in the perception of the implementation of science learning between Indonesian and Singaporean students. Indonesian students tend to be stronger in defining that science learning is full of exploration, collaboration, and teachers play the role of counselor very well, while Singapore students feel more than practical learning based on science and teachers provide student assistance in dealing with difficulties in the learning process.","PeriodicalId":30901,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","volume":"6 1","pages":"79-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences between Indonesia and Singapore based on PISA 2015: Five-factor students’ perception in science education\",\"authors\":\"J. Arlinwibowo, H. Kistoro, H. Retnawati, G. Kassymova, B. Kenzhaliyev\",\"doi\":\"10.21831/jipi.v6i1.32637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a neighbouring country whose location is very close, there is a unique fact where the results of the PISA study show very different results between Indonesia and Singapore. Students' perceptions of learning have an important role to detect the quality of learning. Thus, this study aims to determine the factors of student perception of natural science learning and the differences between the two countries based on these factors. The sample in this study were 5870 Indonesian students and 5272 Singaporean students who took the 2015 PISA survey. The research data were the results of the PISA survey (codes ST098, ST100, ST103, and ST104) regarding student perception of natural science learning. The data analysis technique used is Principal Component Analysis to detect factors and Discriminant Analysis to show differences between the two countries. Students' perceptions of science learning in Singapore and Indonesia can be classified into five factors: Practicum, Assistant, Explorative, Counseling, and Collaborative. Based on these factors, there are differences in the perception of the implementation of science learning between Indonesian and Singaporean students. Indonesian students tend to be stronger in defining that science learning is full of exploration, collaboration, and teachers play the role of counselor very well, while Singapore students feel more than practical learning based on science and teachers provide student assistance in dealing with difficulties in the learning process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"79-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.32637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i1.32637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

作为一个地理位置非常接近的邻国,有一个独特的事实,即PISA的研究结果显示,印度尼西亚和新加坡之间的结果非常不同。学生对学习的感知在检测学习质量方面发挥着重要作用。因此,本研究旨在确定学生对自然科学学习感知的因素,以及基于这些因素的两国差异。这项研究的样本是5870名印尼学生和5272名新加坡学生,他们参加了2015年PISA的调查。研究数据是PISA关于学生对自然科学学习感知的调查结果(代码ST098、ST100、ST103和ST104)。所使用的数据分析技术是检测因素的主成分分析和显示两国差异的判别分析。新加坡和印度尼西亚的学生对科学学习的看法可分为五个因素:实践、助理、探索、咨询和合作。基于这些因素,印尼和新加坡学生对科学学习实施的认知存在差异。印尼学生往往更倾向于定义科学学习充满探索、协作,教师很好地扮演着辅导员的角色,而新加坡学生则觉得不仅仅是基于科学的实际学习,教师在学习过程中为学生提供帮助,帮助他们应对困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences between Indonesia and Singapore based on PISA 2015: Five-factor students’ perception in science education
As a neighbouring country whose location is very close, there is a unique fact where the results of the PISA study show very different results between Indonesia and Singapore. Students' perceptions of learning have an important role to detect the quality of learning. Thus, this study aims to determine the factors of student perception of natural science learning and the differences between the two countries based on these factors. The sample in this study were 5870 Indonesian students and 5272 Singaporean students who took the 2015 PISA survey. The research data were the results of the PISA survey (codes ST098, ST100, ST103, and ST104) regarding student perception of natural science learning. The data analysis technique used is Principal Component Analysis to detect factors and Discriminant Analysis to show differences between the two countries. Students' perceptions of science learning in Singapore and Indonesia can be classified into five factors: Practicum, Assistant, Explorative, Counseling, and Collaborative. Based on these factors, there are differences in the perception of the implementation of science learning between Indonesian and Singaporean students. Indonesian students tend to be stronger in defining that science learning is full of exploration, collaboration, and teachers play the role of counselor very well, while Singapore students feel more than practical learning based on science and teachers provide student assistance in dealing with difficulties in the learning process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信