Robin Ramcharan和Bertrand Ramcharan新加坡:《亚洲与世界人权宣言的起草》:Palgrave Macmillan,2019。255页精装本:99.99欧元

Q3 Social Sciences
Atul Alexander, Smriti Rajhesh
{"title":"Robin Ramcharan和Bertrand Ramcharan新加坡:《亚洲与世界人权宣言的起草》:Palgrave Macmillan,2019。255页精装本:99.99欧元","authors":"Atul Alexander, Smriti Rajhesh","doi":"10.1017/asjcl.2022.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Asia and the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one of the pioneering works on Asian contributions to the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Authors Robin Ramcharan and Bertrand Ramcharan detail the Asian values of freedom, tolerance, equality, equity, respect, and diversity in ten chapters, which focus on the drafting of the UDHR, the principles of the UDHR, as well as its implementation and future. The book’s focus is on the drafting stages of the UDHR. The authors’ prime contention is that even after 70 years of the adoption of the UDHR, Asian states continue to repose faith in the UDHR both in governance and development. According to the authors, until 1993, Asian states expounded the relativist argument, which disputed the universality of the Western values of individualism on the basis of the lived experiences of Asian societies. The 1993 Bangkok Declaration was a watershed event for human rights in Asia. The Bangkok Declaration recognised that all human rights were universal and therefore must be interpreted in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norms. Moreover, the Bangkok Declaration reaffirmed the commitments laid down in the UDHR. These acknowledgments were contrary to the main narrative of Third-World scholars, who perceived the universal nature of human rights as an attempt to impose western practices on Asian countries. The book discusses Asian approaches to the drafting of the UDHR. The authors point out that, whereas the Western drafters preferred a non-binding instrument, the Asian drafters called for a solid, binding legal instrument. Asian delegates argued for self-determination and emancipation (Romulo), non-discrimination and gender equality (Hansa Mehta), and the freedom of religion (Zafarullah Khan). The Chinese delegate, PC Chang, pointed out that the Western thinkers on human rights had been influenced by Chinese values. The book also describes the Asian vision for the UDHR, which sought to bring into focus the ‘new humanism’ of the declaration and its universal values. The authors demonstrate that Asian values influenced concepts in the UDHR, such as the right of self-determination, equality and justice. The authors also provide a comprehensive account of the role of Asian constitutions in the formulation of the UDHR. In this respect, the authors could have delved more into the subsequent developments in terms of Asian contribution in interpreting UDHR, which would have rendered a complete picture of contemporary Asian practice. Having said that, the authors discuss the inefficacy of the regional and national protection systems with the growing human rights violations across countries, arguing that a strong state, the rule of law, and democratic accountability are fundamental for implementing the principles of UDHR.","PeriodicalId":39405,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asia and the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by Robin Ramcharan & Bertrand Ramcharan Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. 255 pp. Hardcover: €99.99\",\"authors\":\"Atul Alexander, Smriti Rajhesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/asjcl.2022.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Asia and the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one of the pioneering works on Asian contributions to the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Authors Robin Ramcharan and Bertrand Ramcharan detail the Asian values of freedom, tolerance, equality, equity, respect, and diversity in ten chapters, which focus on the drafting of the UDHR, the principles of the UDHR, as well as its implementation and future. The book’s focus is on the drafting stages of the UDHR. The authors’ prime contention is that even after 70 years of the adoption of the UDHR, Asian states continue to repose faith in the UDHR both in governance and development. According to the authors, until 1993, Asian states expounded the relativist argument, which disputed the universality of the Western values of individualism on the basis of the lived experiences of Asian societies. The 1993 Bangkok Declaration was a watershed event for human rights in Asia. The Bangkok Declaration recognised that all human rights were universal and therefore must be interpreted in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norms. Moreover, the Bangkok Declaration reaffirmed the commitments laid down in the UDHR. These acknowledgments were contrary to the main narrative of Third-World scholars, who perceived the universal nature of human rights as an attempt to impose western practices on Asian countries. The book discusses Asian approaches to the drafting of the UDHR. The authors point out that, whereas the Western drafters preferred a non-binding instrument, the Asian drafters called for a solid, binding legal instrument. Asian delegates argued for self-determination and emancipation (Romulo), non-discrimination and gender equality (Hansa Mehta), and the freedom of religion (Zafarullah Khan). The Chinese delegate, PC Chang, pointed out that the Western thinkers on human rights had been influenced by Chinese values. The book also describes the Asian vision for the UDHR, which sought to bring into focus the ‘new humanism’ of the declaration and its universal values. The authors demonstrate that Asian values influenced concepts in the UDHR, such as the right of self-determination, equality and justice. The authors also provide a comprehensive account of the role of Asian constitutions in the formulation of the UDHR. In this respect, the authors could have delved more into the subsequent developments in terms of Asian contribution in interpreting UDHR, which would have rendered a complete picture of contemporary Asian practice. Having said that, the authors discuss the inefficacy of the regional and national protection systems with the growing human rights violations across countries, arguing that a strong state, the rule of law, and democratic accountability are fundamental for implementing the principles of UDHR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Comparative Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2022.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2022.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《亚洲与起草世界人权宣言》是亚洲为起草《世界人权宣言》作出贡献的开创性著作之一。作者Robin Ramcharan和Bertrand Ramcharan在十章中详细介绍了自由、宽容、平等、公平、尊重和多样性的亚洲价值观,重点是《世界人权宣言》的起草、《世界人权宣言》的原则、实施和未来。本书的重点是《世界人权宣言》的起草阶段。作者的主要论点是,即使在《世界人权宣言》通过70年后,亚洲国家仍然在治理和发展方面对《世界人权宣言》抱有信心。根据作者的说法,直到1993年,亚洲国家阐述了相对主义论点,该论点以亚洲社会的生活经验为基础,对西方个人主义价值观的普遍性提出了质疑。1993年的《曼谷宣言》是亚洲人权的一个分水岭。《曼谷宣言》承认所有人权都是普遍的,因此必须在国际规范的动态和不断发展的过程中加以解释。此外,《曼谷宣言》重申了《世界人权宣言》所载的承诺。这些承认与第三世界学者的主要叙述相反,他们认为人权的普遍性是企图将西方的做法强加给亚洲国家。这本书讨论了亚洲起草《世界人权宣言》的方法。作者指出,西方起草者倾向于一项不具约束力的文书,而亚洲起草者则要求一项坚实的、有约束力的法律文书。亚洲代表主张自决和解放(罗慕洛)、不歧视和性别平等(汉萨·梅塔)、宗教自由(扎法鲁拉·汗)。中国代表张政委指出,西方人权思想家受到了中国价值观的影响。这本书还描述了《世界人权宣言》的亚洲愿景,它试图将《宣言》的“新人文主义”及其普遍价值纳入焦点。这组作者证明,亚洲价值观影响了《世界人权宣言》中的一些概念,如自决权、平等和正义。作者还全面介绍了亚洲宪法在制定《世界人权宣言》中的作用。在这方面,作者本可以更深入地探讨亚洲在解释《世界人权宣言》方面的贡献,这将全面反映当代亚洲的做法。话虽如此,作者讨论了地区和国家保护体系的无效,以及各国日益严重的侵犯人权行为,认为强大的国家、法治和民主问责制是实施《世界人权宣言》原则的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asia and the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by Robin Ramcharan & Bertrand Ramcharan Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019. 255 pp. Hardcover: €99.99
Asia and the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is one of the pioneering works on Asian contributions to the drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Authors Robin Ramcharan and Bertrand Ramcharan detail the Asian values of freedom, tolerance, equality, equity, respect, and diversity in ten chapters, which focus on the drafting of the UDHR, the principles of the UDHR, as well as its implementation and future. The book’s focus is on the drafting stages of the UDHR. The authors’ prime contention is that even after 70 years of the adoption of the UDHR, Asian states continue to repose faith in the UDHR both in governance and development. According to the authors, until 1993, Asian states expounded the relativist argument, which disputed the universality of the Western values of individualism on the basis of the lived experiences of Asian societies. The 1993 Bangkok Declaration was a watershed event for human rights in Asia. The Bangkok Declaration recognised that all human rights were universal and therefore must be interpreted in the context of a dynamic and evolving process of international norms. Moreover, the Bangkok Declaration reaffirmed the commitments laid down in the UDHR. These acknowledgments were contrary to the main narrative of Third-World scholars, who perceived the universal nature of human rights as an attempt to impose western practices on Asian countries. The book discusses Asian approaches to the drafting of the UDHR. The authors point out that, whereas the Western drafters preferred a non-binding instrument, the Asian drafters called for a solid, binding legal instrument. Asian delegates argued for self-determination and emancipation (Romulo), non-discrimination and gender equality (Hansa Mehta), and the freedom of religion (Zafarullah Khan). The Chinese delegate, PC Chang, pointed out that the Western thinkers on human rights had been influenced by Chinese values. The book also describes the Asian vision for the UDHR, which sought to bring into focus the ‘new humanism’ of the declaration and its universal values. The authors demonstrate that Asian values influenced concepts in the UDHR, such as the right of self-determination, equality and justice. The authors also provide a comprehensive account of the role of Asian constitutions in the formulation of the UDHR. In this respect, the authors could have delved more into the subsequent developments in terms of Asian contribution in interpreting UDHR, which would have rendered a complete picture of contemporary Asian practice. Having said that, the authors discuss the inefficacy of the regional and national protection systems with the growing human rights violations across countries, arguing that a strong state, the rule of law, and democratic accountability are fundamental for implementing the principles of UDHR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Comparative Law
Asian Journal of Comparative Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Comparative Law (AsJCL) is the leading forum for research and discussion of the law and legal systems of Asia. It embraces work that is theoretical, empirical, socio-legal, doctrinal or comparative that relates to one or more Asian legal systems, as well as work that compares one or more Asian legal systems with non-Asian systems. The Journal seeks articles which display an intimate knowledge of Asian legal systems, and thus provide a window into the way they work in practice. The AsJCL is an initiative of the Asian Law Institute (ASLI), an association established by thirteen leading law schools in Asia and with a rapidly expanding membership base across Asia and in other regions around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信