混合政权和自由民主中亲欧盟抗议活动的新闻框架:俄罗斯和英国新闻媒体的比较

IF 1.7 Q2 COMMUNICATION

Media War and Conflict Pub Date : 2020-09-15 DOI:10.1177/1750635220953445

Zixiu Liu

{"title":"混合政权和自由民主中亲欧盟抗议活动的新闻框架:俄罗斯和英国新闻媒体的比较","authors":"Zixiu Liu","doi":"10.1177/1750635220953445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines and compares news framing of the protests in Ukraine from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014, encompassing three news sectors in the hybrid regime setting of Russia and the liberal democracy of the UK. Following Godefroidt et al.’s (2016) approach in their article in International Communication Gazette 78(8), the findings suggest that, while the Russian media used economic consequences and morality frames in the reporting of the protests reflecting the country’s political rhetoric on Ukraine, the British media preferred a human-interest frame and delivered a primarily one-sided coverage. The confrontational interpretations of the crisis by the Russian and UK media revealed an illiberal trend in both the hybrid regime and the liberal democracy.","PeriodicalId":45719,"journal":{"name":"Media War and Conflict","volume":"15 1","pages":"407 - 426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635220953445","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News framing of the Euromaidan protests in the hybrid regime and the liberal democracy: Comparison of Russian and UK news media\",\"authors\":\"Zixiu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1750635220953445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines and compares news framing of the protests in Ukraine from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014, encompassing three news sectors in the hybrid regime setting of Russia and the liberal democracy of the UK. Following Godefroidt et al.’s (2016) approach in their article in International Communication Gazette 78(8), the findings suggest that, while the Russian media used economic consequences and morality frames in the reporting of the protests reflecting the country’s political rhetoric on Ukraine, the British media preferred a human-interest frame and delivered a primarily one-sided coverage. The confrontational interpretations of the crisis by the Russian and UK media revealed an illiberal trend in both the hybrid regime and the liberal democracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 426\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1750635220953445\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635220953445\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media War and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635220953445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 6

摘要

本研究考察并比较了2013年11月30日至2014年2月26日乌克兰抗议活动的新闻框架，涵盖了俄罗斯混合政权和英国自由民主制度下的三个新闻部门。根据Godefroidt等人(2016)在《国际传播公报》78(8)上的文章中采用的方法，研究结果表明，尽管俄罗斯媒体在报道反映该国对乌克兰政治言论的抗议活动时使用了经济后果和道德框架，但英国媒体更倾向于人文利益框架，并提供了主要的片面报道。俄罗斯和英国媒体对这场危机的对抗性解读，揭示出混合型政权和自由民主制都存在一种不自由的趋势。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

News framing of the Euromaidan protests in the hybrid regime and the liberal democracy: Comparison of Russian and UK news media

This study examines and compares news framing of the protests in Ukraine from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014, encompassing three news sectors in the hybrid regime setting of Russia and the liberal democracy of the UK. Following Godefroidt et al.’s (2016) approach in their article in International Communication Gazette 78(8), the findings suggest that, while the Russian media used economic consequences and morality frames in the reporting of the protests reflecting the country’s political rhetoric on Ukraine, the British media preferred a human-interest frame and delivered a primarily one-sided coverage. The confrontational interpretations of the crisis by the Russian and UK media revealed an illiberal trend in both the hybrid regime and the liberal democracy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Media War and Conflict COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

3.60

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Media, War & Conflict is a major new international, peer-reviewed journal that maps the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an intensively and extensively mediated age. It will explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices, and new media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. Media, War & Conflict is the first journal to be dedicated to this field. It will publish substantial research articles, shorter pieces, book reviews, letters and commentary, and will include an images section devoted to visual aspects of war and conflict.