混合译语和CLIL:孟加拉课堂教学的益处和意识形态挑战

A. Rafi, A. Morgan
{"title":"混合译语和CLIL:孟加拉课堂教学的益处和意识形态挑战","authors":"A. Rafi, A. Morgan","doi":"10.1080/15427587.2022.2090361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study employed a blended approach of translanguaging pedagogy and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in an Anthropology class of a Bangladeshi public university. Data were collected through classroom observation, a pedagogical intervention, a focus group discussion with six students, and a semi-structured interview with the class teacher. The results show that the blended approach created a dynamic learning space in an otherwise teacher-centered classroom, keeping students intrinsically engaged and enhancing the acquisition of Anthropology content knowledge and institutionally appropriate language conventions. The students acknowledged the positive potential of the blended approach. In contrast, the teacher opposed this approach by appraising the ideological complexities that might derive from the socio-political realities of the Bangladeshi context. The study recommended initiating conversation among education communities, prestige planning of translanguaging practices and teacher education programmes to benefit from the blended approach of translanguaging pedagogies and CLIL.","PeriodicalId":53706,"journal":{"name":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blending translanguaging and CLIL: pedagogical benefits and ideological challenges in a Bangladeshi classroom\",\"authors\":\"A. Rafi, A. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15427587.2022.2090361\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The study employed a blended approach of translanguaging pedagogy and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in an Anthropology class of a Bangladeshi public university. Data were collected through classroom observation, a pedagogical intervention, a focus group discussion with six students, and a semi-structured interview with the class teacher. The results show that the blended approach created a dynamic learning space in an otherwise teacher-centered classroom, keeping students intrinsically engaged and enhancing the acquisition of Anthropology content knowledge and institutionally appropriate language conventions. The students acknowledged the positive potential of the blended approach. In contrast, the teacher opposed this approach by appraising the ideological complexities that might derive from the socio-political realities of the Bangladeshi context. The study recommended initiating conversation among education communities, prestige planning of translanguaging practices and teacher education programmes to benefit from the blended approach of translanguaging pedagogies and CLIL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2090361\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Inquiry in Language Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427587.2022.2090361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要:本研究在孟加拉国一所公立大学的人类学课堂上采用了跨语言教学法和内容与语言综合学习(CLIL)的混合方法。通过课堂观察、教学干预、与六名学生的焦点小组讨论以及与班主任的半结构化访谈来收集数据。结果表明,混合方法在以教师为中心的课堂中创造了一个动态的学习空间,使学生保持内在的参与,并增强了人类学内容知识和制度上适当的语言惯例的获取。学生们承认了这种混合方法的积极潜力。相比之下,老师反对这种方法,通过评估意识形态的复杂性,可能源于孟加拉国的社会政治现实。该研究建议在教育界之间开展对话,制定跨语言实践的声望计划,以及教师教育计划,以从跨语言教学法和CLIL的混合方法中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Blending translanguaging and CLIL: pedagogical benefits and ideological challenges in a Bangladeshi classroom
ABSTRACT The study employed a blended approach of translanguaging pedagogy and Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) in an Anthropology class of a Bangladeshi public university. Data were collected through classroom observation, a pedagogical intervention, a focus group discussion with six students, and a semi-structured interview with the class teacher. The results show that the blended approach created a dynamic learning space in an otherwise teacher-centered classroom, keeping students intrinsically engaged and enhancing the acquisition of Anthropology content knowledge and institutionally appropriate language conventions. The students acknowledged the positive potential of the blended approach. In contrast, the teacher opposed this approach by appraising the ideological complexities that might derive from the socio-political realities of the Bangladeshi context. The study recommended initiating conversation among education communities, prestige planning of translanguaging practices and teacher education programmes to benefit from the blended approach of translanguaging pedagogies and CLIL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies
Critical Inquiry in Language Studies Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信