{"title":"虚构中的真实","authors":"Nathaniel B. Jones","doi":"10.1086/706208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"2. For which see, e.g., R. L. Gordon, “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Greco-Roman World,” Art History 2 (1979): 5–34; R. T. Neer, “Connoisseurship and the Stakes of Style,” Critical Inquiry 32 (2005): 1–26; E. Marlowe, Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship, and the History of Roman Art (London, 2013); A. H. Borbein, “Connoisseurship,” in The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, ed. C. Marconi (Oxford, 2014), 519–40. 3. See recently C. Isler-Kerényi, “Iconographical and Iconological Approaches,” in Marconi, Oxford Handbook, 558–78. The quest for origins","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"71-72 1","pages":"229 - 240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/706208","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Truth from fiction\",\"authors\":\"Nathaniel B. Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/706208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"2. For which see, e.g., R. L. Gordon, “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Greco-Roman World,” Art History 2 (1979): 5–34; R. T. Neer, “Connoisseurship and the Stakes of Style,” Critical Inquiry 32 (2005): 1–26; E. Marlowe, Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship, and the History of Roman Art (London, 2013); A. H. Borbein, “Connoisseurship,” in The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, ed. C. Marconi (Oxford, 2014), 519–40. 3. See recently C. Isler-Kerényi, “Iconographical and Iconological Approaches,” in Marconi, Oxford Handbook, 558–78. The quest for origins\",\"PeriodicalId\":39613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\"71-72 1\",\"pages\":\"229 - 240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/706208\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/706208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/706208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2. 参见r.l. Gordon,“真实与想象:希腊罗马世界的生产与宗教”,《艺术史》第2期(1979):5-34页;R. T. Neer,“鉴赏与风格的利害关系”,《批判探究》32 (2005):1-26;E. Marlowe,《摇摇欲坠的土地:语境、鉴赏和罗马艺术史》(伦敦,2013);A. H. Borbein,“鉴赏”,见《牛津希腊罗马艺术与建筑手册》,C. Marconi主编(Oxford, 2014), 519-40页。3.参见最近C. isler - kersamunyi,“图像学和图像学方法”,Marconi, Oxford Handbook, 558-78。对起源的探索
2. For which see, e.g., R. L. Gordon, “The Real and the Imaginary: Production and Religion in the Greco-Roman World,” Art History 2 (1979): 5–34; R. T. Neer, “Connoisseurship and the Stakes of Style,” Critical Inquiry 32 (2005): 1–26; E. Marlowe, Shaky Ground: Context, Connoisseurship, and the History of Roman Art (London, 2013); A. H. Borbein, “Connoisseurship,” in The Oxford Handbook of Greek and Roman Art and Architecture, ed. C. Marconi (Oxford, 2014), 519–40. 3. See recently C. Isler-Kerényi, “Iconographical and Iconological Approaches,” in Marconi, Oxford Handbook, 558–78. The quest for origins
期刊介绍:
Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.