消费者如何选择绿色电力产品而不是传统电力?福利分析方法

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Walid Hadhri, Chema Abderrazak
{"title":"消费者如何选择绿色电力产品而不是传统电力?福利分析方法","authors":"Walid Hadhri, Chema Abderrazak","doi":"10.1177/23210222221100600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this article is to analyze theoretically whether changes in an access charge pricing policy can promote green electricity use. The model considers two hypothetical firms: One firm offers green electricity product, and the other firm provides conventional electricity. Each firm pays an access charge to the natural monopoly in order to have access to the transportation network. Through using a vertical differentiation model, we try to analyze the link between the access charges paid by the two firms and the qualities offered. We also attempt to explain why the consumers do not often choose green electricity. Finally, we suggest a new policy that can lead the consumers to choose the green electricity product instead of conventional electricity. Our model shows that changes in the access charge pricing policies can constitute a relevant component in the reforms of the electricity sector and can have impacts on the consumption of the green electricity. A differentiating access charge policy could allow a better penetration of the green electricity product and an increase in the social welfare when consumers have greater preferences in environmental qualities. Otherwise, their preservation at a uniform level is desirable in order to maintain the competition. JEL Classifications: B21, C72, L13, Q21, P28","PeriodicalId":37410,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Microeconomics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Consumers Choose the Green Electricity Product Instead of Conventional Electricity? A Welfare Analysis Approach\",\"authors\":\"Walid Hadhri, Chema Abderrazak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23210222221100600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this article is to analyze theoretically whether changes in an access charge pricing policy can promote green electricity use. The model considers two hypothetical firms: One firm offers green electricity product, and the other firm provides conventional electricity. Each firm pays an access charge to the natural monopoly in order to have access to the transportation network. Through using a vertical differentiation model, we try to analyze the link between the access charges paid by the two firms and the qualities offered. We also attempt to explain why the consumers do not often choose green electricity. Finally, we suggest a new policy that can lead the consumers to choose the green electricity product instead of conventional electricity. Our model shows that changes in the access charge pricing policies can constitute a relevant component in the reforms of the electricity sector and can have impacts on the consumption of the green electricity. A differentiating access charge policy could allow a better penetration of the green electricity product and an increase in the social welfare when consumers have greater preferences in environmental qualities. Otherwise, their preservation at a uniform level is desirable in order to maintain the competition. JEL Classifications: B21, C72, L13, Q21, P28\",\"PeriodicalId\":37410,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Microeconomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Microeconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222221100600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Microeconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222221100600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是从理论上分析接入收费政策的变化是否能促进绿色电力的使用。该模型考虑两个假设的公司:一个公司提供绿色电力产品,另一个公司提供传统电力。为了进入运输网络,每个公司都要向自然垄断支付使用费。通过纵向差异化模型,本文试图分析两家企业所支付的接入费用与所提供的服务质量之间的关系。我们也试图解释为什么消费者不经常选择绿色电力。最后,我们提出了一个新的政策,可以引导消费者选择绿色电力产品而不是传统电力。我们的模型表明,接入收费政策的变化可以构成电力部门改革的相关组成部分,并可能对绿色电力的消费产生影响。当消费者对环境质量有更大的偏好时,差异化接入收费政策可以使绿色电力产品更好地渗透,并增加社会福利。否则,为了保持竞争,它们应该保持在一个统一的水平。JEL分类:B21, C72, L13, Q21, P28
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Consumers Choose the Green Electricity Product Instead of Conventional Electricity? A Welfare Analysis Approach
The aim of this article is to analyze theoretically whether changes in an access charge pricing policy can promote green electricity use. The model considers two hypothetical firms: One firm offers green electricity product, and the other firm provides conventional electricity. Each firm pays an access charge to the natural monopoly in order to have access to the transportation network. Through using a vertical differentiation model, we try to analyze the link between the access charges paid by the two firms and the qualities offered. We also attempt to explain why the consumers do not often choose green electricity. Finally, we suggest a new policy that can lead the consumers to choose the green electricity product instead of conventional electricity. Our model shows that changes in the access charge pricing policies can constitute a relevant component in the reforms of the electricity sector and can have impacts on the consumption of the green electricity. A differentiating access charge policy could allow a better penetration of the green electricity product and an increase in the social welfare when consumers have greater preferences in environmental qualities. Otherwise, their preservation at a uniform level is desirable in order to maintain the competition. JEL Classifications: B21, C72, L13, Q21, P28
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Microeconomics
Studies in Microeconomics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Studies in Microeconomics seeks high quality theoretical as well as applied (or empirical) research in all areas of microeconomics (broadly defined to include other avenues of decision science such as psychology, political science and organizational behavior). In particular, we encourage submissions in new areas of Microeconomics such as in the fields of Experimental economics and Behavioral Economics. All manuscripts will be subjected to a peer-review process. The intended audience of the journal are professional economists and young researchers with an interest and expertise in microeconomics and above. In addition to full-length articles MIC is interested in publishing and promoting shorter refereed articles (letters and notes) that are pertinent to the specialist in the field of Microeconomics (broadly defined). MIC will periodically publish special issues with themes of particular interest, including articles solicited from leading scholars as well as authoritative survey articles and meta-analysis on the themed topic. We will also publish book reviews related to microeconomics, and MIC encourages publishing articles from policy practitioners dealing with microeconomic issues that have policy relevance under the section Policy Analysis and Debate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信