计数和公式:25年未来的记忆锚定

IF 0.1 0 LITERATURE
R. Nofal
{"title":"计数和公式:25年未来的记忆锚定","authors":"R. Nofal","doi":"10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Memory and testimony studies renew classic debates that confront established theses on the violence of the 20th century. In this framework, I read the critical itinerary of Anclajes as it expands the literary canon from a corpus cut out by the memoirs in conflict in the Southern Cone. I argue that memoirs are not involved as a remnant of anecdotes of a defeat, but that they emerged in the very center of literary production as a divergent corpus that illuminates a new point of conflict in the colonial dispute over language, writing and territory.","PeriodicalId":40458,"journal":{"name":"Anclajes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recuento y fórmula: Anclajes de la memoria en un devenir de veinticinco años\",\"authors\":\"R. Nofal\",\"doi\":\"10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Memory and testimony studies renew classic debates that confront established theses on the violence of the 20th century. In this framework, I read the critical itinerary of Anclajes as it expands the literary canon from a corpus cut out by the memoirs in conflict in the Southern Cone. I argue that memoirs are not involved as a remnant of anecdotes of a defeat, but that they emerged in the very center of literary production as a divergent corpus that illuminates a new point of conflict in the colonial dispute over language, writing and territory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anclajes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anclajes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anclajes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19137/anclajes-2021-2539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

记忆和证词研究重新引发了关于20世纪暴力的经典辩论。在这个框架下,我阅读了安克拉耶斯的批评行程,因为它从南锥体冲突回忆录中截取的语料库中扩展了文学经典。我认为,回忆录并不是失败轶事的残余,而是作为一个不同的语料库出现在文学创作的中心,照亮了殖民地语言、写作和领土争端中的一个新的冲突点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recuento y fórmula: Anclajes de la memoria en un devenir de veinticinco años
Memory and testimony studies renew classic debates that confront established theses on the violence of the 20th century. In this framework, I read the critical itinerary of Anclajes as it expands the literary canon from a corpus cut out by the memoirs in conflict in the Southern Cone. I argue that memoirs are not involved as a remnant of anecdotes of a defeat, but that they emerged in the very center of literary production as a divergent corpus that illuminates a new point of conflict in the colonial dispute over language, writing and territory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anclajes
Anclajes LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
48 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信