在签名与抄写之间:纸莎草上的书写与思考

IF 0.5 Q1 HISTORY
Book History Pub Date : 2018-12-04 DOI:10.1353/BH.2018.0000
Rachel Yuen-Collingridge
{"title":"在签名与抄写之间:纸莎草上的书写与思考","authors":"Rachel Yuen-Collingridge","doi":"10.1353/BH.2018.0000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper examines at the physical traces of cognition left on papyrus manuscripts from Graeco-Roman Egypt. It borrows from theories developed in the cognitive sciences and philosophy which extend cognition beyond the brain to view it as a cooperation between mind and environment. Examined from this perspective, the classic opposition between scribe as wilful editor and scribe as pure medium for transmission breaks down. The invective of literary sources against the scribe as corruptor of text sits awkwardly with papyrus evidence which shows scribes acting as trusted allies in composition. This binary way of thinking of the scribal contribution to the transmission of knowledge might be alleviated by thinking of scribal practice as a cognitively rich collaboration between material and mind and by attending to physical traces of this engagement. In particular, this paper suggests that patterns of re-inking the stylus may correspond to sense breaks if the scribe is particularly conscious of or invested in a manuscript's content. If such is true, an examination of re-inking patterns may offer papyrologists a new technique to track scribal engagement in the content they produce.","PeriodicalId":43753,"journal":{"name":"Book History","volume":"21 1","pages":"1 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/BH.2018.0000","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between Autograph and Copy: Writing as Thinking on Papyrus\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Yuen-Collingridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/BH.2018.0000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This paper examines at the physical traces of cognition left on papyrus manuscripts from Graeco-Roman Egypt. It borrows from theories developed in the cognitive sciences and philosophy which extend cognition beyond the brain to view it as a cooperation between mind and environment. Examined from this perspective, the classic opposition between scribe as wilful editor and scribe as pure medium for transmission breaks down. The invective of literary sources against the scribe as corruptor of text sits awkwardly with papyrus evidence which shows scribes acting as trusted allies in composition. This binary way of thinking of the scribal contribution to the transmission of knowledge might be alleviated by thinking of scribal practice as a cognitively rich collaboration between material and mind and by attending to physical traces of this engagement. In particular, this paper suggests that patterns of re-inking the stylus may correspond to sense breaks if the scribe is particularly conscious of or invested in a manuscript's content. If such is true, an examination of re-inking patterns may offer papyrologists a new technique to track scribal engagement in the content they produce.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Book History\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/BH.2018.0000\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Book History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/BH.2018.0000\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Book History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/BH.2018.0000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文考察了希腊罗马时代埃及纸莎草手稿上留下的认知的物理痕迹。它借鉴了认知科学和哲学中发展起来的理论,这些理论将认知扩展到大脑之外,将其视为心灵和环境之间的合作。从这个角度审视,作为任性编辑的抄写员与作为纯粹传播媒介的抄写员之间的经典对立被打破了。文学来源对抄写员作为文本破坏者的谩骂与纸莎草证据尴尬地坐在一起,这些证据表明抄写员在写作中扮演着值得信赖的盟友。这种关于抄写对知识传播的贡献的二元思维方式可以通过将抄写实践视为物质和精神之间丰富的认知合作以及关注这种参与的物理痕迹来减轻。特别是,这篇论文表明,如果抄写员特别意识到或投资于手稿的内容,那么重新上墨的笔尖的模式可能对应于感觉断裂。如果这是真的,那么对重新连接模式的检查可能会为纸莎草学家提供一种新技术,以跟踪他们所产生的内容中的抄写参与情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Between Autograph and Copy: Writing as Thinking on Papyrus
Abstract:This paper examines at the physical traces of cognition left on papyrus manuscripts from Graeco-Roman Egypt. It borrows from theories developed in the cognitive sciences and philosophy which extend cognition beyond the brain to view it as a cooperation between mind and environment. Examined from this perspective, the classic opposition between scribe as wilful editor and scribe as pure medium for transmission breaks down. The invective of literary sources against the scribe as corruptor of text sits awkwardly with papyrus evidence which shows scribes acting as trusted allies in composition. This binary way of thinking of the scribal contribution to the transmission of knowledge might be alleviated by thinking of scribal practice as a cognitively rich collaboration between material and mind and by attending to physical traces of this engagement. In particular, this paper suggests that patterns of re-inking the stylus may correspond to sense breaks if the scribe is particularly conscious of or invested in a manuscript's content. If such is true, an examination of re-inking patterns may offer papyrologists a new technique to track scribal engagement in the content they produce.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Book History
Book History HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信