Polar®心率监测仪接口板与ECG之间的时间相互关联,以测量静息时的RR间期

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Wollner Materko, Caio Cesar dos Reis Façanha, Gizelly Coelho Guedes, Marcela Fabiani Silva Dias, Alisson Vieira Costa, Dilson Rodrigues Belfort, Demilto Yamaguchi da Pureza, Á. A. Alberto
{"title":"Polar®心率监测仪接口板与ECG之间的时间相互关联,以测量静息时的RR间期","authors":"Wollner Materko, Caio Cesar dos Reis Façanha, Gizelly Coelho Guedes, Marcela Fabiani Silva Dias, Alisson Vieira Costa, Dilson Rodrigues Belfort, Demilto Yamaguchi da Pureza, Á. A. Alberto","doi":"10.3233/ies-230061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: A Polar heart rate monitor is a device that measures RR intervals, but has not been correlated to accurately measure the series of RR interval signals between the ECG and the Polar® Heart Rate Monitor Interface (HRMI) Board at rest. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the temporal cross-correlations between the Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG to measure the series of RR intervals at rest. METHODS: The sample consisted of eighteen healthy male subjects and they were instructed to lie in the supine position at rest while breathing normally and a time window of the last 2 min was recorded to analyse RR intervals were obtained for each subject with a Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG. Cross-correlation analysis of RR interval signals between methods and reliability was expressed by Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: The cross-correlation was excellent, resulting in a mean of 0.98 ± 0.01 and no lag or delay between the signals. The bias was 0.03 ± 0.08 s or 8.0% for MeanRRi from Polar® HRMI Board and ECG, no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The Polar® HRMI Board is acceptable for assessment of serial RR intervals. The results support the reliability of the Mean RR interval compared to a resting ECG.","PeriodicalId":54915,"journal":{"name":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal cross-correlation between Polar® heart rate monitor interface board and ECG to measure RR interval at rest\",\"authors\":\"Wollner Materko, Caio Cesar dos Reis Façanha, Gizelly Coelho Guedes, Marcela Fabiani Silva Dias, Alisson Vieira Costa, Dilson Rodrigues Belfort, Demilto Yamaguchi da Pureza, Á. A. Alberto\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/ies-230061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: A Polar heart rate monitor is a device that measures RR intervals, but has not been correlated to accurately measure the series of RR interval signals between the ECG and the Polar® Heart Rate Monitor Interface (HRMI) Board at rest. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the temporal cross-correlations between the Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG to measure the series of RR intervals at rest. METHODS: The sample consisted of eighteen healthy male subjects and they were instructed to lie in the supine position at rest while breathing normally and a time window of the last 2 min was recorded to analyse RR intervals were obtained for each subject with a Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG. Cross-correlation analysis of RR interval signals between methods and reliability was expressed by Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: The cross-correlation was excellent, resulting in a mean of 0.98 ± 0.01 and no lag or delay between the signals. The bias was 0.03 ± 0.08 s or 8.0% for MeanRRi from Polar® HRMI Board and ECG, no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The Polar® HRMI Board is acceptable for assessment of serial RR intervals. The results support the reliability of the Mean RR interval compared to a resting ECG.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isokinetics and Exercise Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isokinetics and Exercise Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-230061\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isokinetics and Exercise Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ies-230061","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Polar心率监测器是一种测量RR间期的设备,但尚未与静息时心电图和Polar®心率监测器接口(HRMI)板之间的一系列RR间期信号相关联。目的:本研究的目的是评估Polar®HRMI板和心电图之间的时间交叉相关性,以测量休息时的一系列RR间期。方法:样本由18名健康男性受试者组成,他们被要求在休息时仰卧,同时正常呼吸,并记录最后2分钟的时间窗口以分析每个受试者的RR间期。采用Bland和Altman分析法对方法间RR间期信号与可靠性进行互相关分析。结果:互相关良好,平均值为0.98±0.01,信号之间没有滞后或延迟。Polar®HRMI Board和ECG的MeanRRi的偏差为0.03±0.08s或8.0%,无显著差异。结论:Polar®HRMI委员会可用于评估系列RR间期。结果支持平均RR间期与静息心电图相比的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal cross-correlation between Polar® heart rate monitor interface board and ECG to measure RR interval at rest
BACKGROUND: A Polar heart rate monitor is a device that measures RR intervals, but has not been correlated to accurately measure the series of RR interval signals between the ECG and the Polar® Heart Rate Monitor Interface (HRMI) Board at rest. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the temporal cross-correlations between the Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG to measure the series of RR intervals at rest. METHODS: The sample consisted of eighteen healthy male subjects and they were instructed to lie in the supine position at rest while breathing normally and a time window of the last 2 min was recorded to analyse RR intervals were obtained for each subject with a Polar® HRMI Board and an ECG. Cross-correlation analysis of RR interval signals between methods and reliability was expressed by Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: The cross-correlation was excellent, resulting in a mean of 0.98 ± 0.01 and no lag or delay between the signals. The bias was 0.03 ± 0.08 s or 8.0% for MeanRRi from Polar® HRMI Board and ECG, no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: The Polar® HRMI Board is acceptable for assessment of serial RR intervals. The results support the reliability of the Mean RR interval compared to a resting ECG.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isokinetics and Exercise Science
Isokinetics and Exercise Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Isokinetics and Exercise Science (IES) is an international journal devoted to the study of theoretical and applied aspects of human muscle performance. Since isokinetic dynamometry constitutes the major tool in this area, the journal takes a particular interest in exploring the considerable potential of this technology. IES publishes studies associated with the methodology of muscle performance especially with respect to the issues of reproducibility and validity of testing, description of normal and pathological mechanical parameters which are derivable from muscle testing, applications in basic research topics such as motor learning paradigms and electromyography. The journal also publishes studies on applications in clinical settings and technical aspects of the various measurement systems employed in human muscle performance research. The journal welcomes submissions in the form of research papers, reviews, case studies and technical reports from professionals in the fields of sports medicine, orthopaedic and neurological rehabilitation and exercise physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信