对澳大利亚气候驱动移民的支持:基于意识形态的威胁模型的测试

Samantha K. Stanley , Zoe Leviston , Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong
{"title":"对澳大利亚气候驱动移民的支持:基于意识形态的威胁模型的测试","authors":"Samantha K. Stanley ,&nbsp;Zoe Leviston ,&nbsp;Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 <em>N</em> = 467, Study 2 <em>N</em> = 1679, Study 3 <em>N</em> = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Support for climate-driven migration in Australia: Testing an ideology-based threat model\",\"authors\":\"Samantha K. Stanley ,&nbsp;Zoe Leviston ,&nbsp;Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 <em>N</em> = 467, Study 2 <em>N</em> = 1679, Study 3 <em>N</em> = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622723000321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了澳大利亚人对重新安置因气候变化而流离失所的人的偏好,这些人来自海外(“气候难民”),来自澳大利亚境内(“内部气候难民”),以及因战争而流离失所的人。通过三项研究(研究1 N = 467,研究2 N = 1679,研究3 N = 492),我们的研究结果显示,对重新安置已经居住在该国的难民群体(国内气候难民和战争难民)的支持更大。尽管对这三个群体的支持率都相当高,但参与者对重新安置国际气候难民的支持程度一直明显较低。这两组国际难民(由于战争或气候变化而迁移)被认为比国内流离失所的澳大利亚人构成更大的威胁。对右翼意识形态态度的支持预示着对气候难民的支持率较低,这是由象征性和现实的威胁感知所介导的。这些发现强调了意识形态、经济和文化方面的担忧可能会削弱对因气候变化而流离失所者的重新安置的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Support for climate-driven migration in Australia: Testing an ideology-based threat model

Support for climate-driven migration in Australia: Testing an ideology-based threat model

We examine Australians’ preferences for resettling people displaced by climate change from overseas (‘climate refugees’), from within Australia (‘internal climate refugees’), and people displaced by war. Across three studies (Study 1 N = 467, Study 2 N = 1679, Study 3 N = 492), our findings reveal greater support for resettling refugee groups already residing in the nation: internal climate refugees and refugees of war. Although support for all three groups was reasonably high, participants were consistently and significantly less supportive of resettling international climate refugees. Both groups of international refugees (relocating due to war or climate changes) were viewed as posing greater threat than internally displaced Australians. Endorsement of right-wing ideological attitudes predicted lower support for climate refugees, which was mediated by symbolic and realistic threat perceptions. These findings highlight the potential of ideology, economic and cultural concerns to undermine support for resettling those displaced by climate change.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信