使用呼气末正压滴定和招募机动在儿科重症监护病房-叙述性回顾

A. Sachdev, Pradeep Kumar, Mohammed Ashif
{"title":"使用呼气末正压滴定和招募机动在儿科重症监护病房-叙述性回顾","authors":"A. Sachdev, Pradeep Kumar, Mohammed Ashif","doi":"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_52_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving support for patients suffering with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This modality is likely to cause ventilator-induced lung injury if not used judiciously and appropriately. Lung protective ventilation strategy is routinely practiced in adult and pediatric intensive care units. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used in “Open Lung Ventilation” strategy and to keep the lung open. PEEP is applied to recruit collapsed alveoli to improve oxygenation, compliance, reduce tidal stress, and strain on the lungs and to promote homogenous lung ventilation. There is no agreement on methods to set “Best PEEP” for a particular patient. There are many approaches described in published literature to optimize PEEP. PEEP titration may be done with PEEP/FiO2 grid, targeted compliance, driving pressure, by using pressure-volume curve and stress index. Esophageal manometry and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume may be used if special equipment, machines, and expertise are available. No single method of PEEP titration has been shown to improve outcome. RM is characterised by sudden transient increase in transpulmonary pressure. Different RMs including high-frequency oscillator ventilation and prone position ventilation have been studied in adults and pediatric patients with very conflicting results and inconsistent survival benefits. Serious complications, hemodynamic instability, air leak syndrome, transient, or no improvements in oxygenation are reported. In this narrative review, we have discussed different methods of PEEP titration and RMs and available evidence for each especially in children.","PeriodicalId":34184,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","volume":"10 1","pages":"145 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of positive end-expiratory pressure titration and recruitment maneuvers in pediatric intensive care unit – A narrative review\",\"authors\":\"A. Sachdev, Pradeep Kumar, Mohammed Ashif\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_52_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving support for patients suffering with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This modality is likely to cause ventilator-induced lung injury if not used judiciously and appropriately. Lung protective ventilation strategy is routinely practiced in adult and pediatric intensive care units. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used in “Open Lung Ventilation” strategy and to keep the lung open. PEEP is applied to recruit collapsed alveoli to improve oxygenation, compliance, reduce tidal stress, and strain on the lungs and to promote homogenous lung ventilation. There is no agreement on methods to set “Best PEEP” for a particular patient. There are many approaches described in published literature to optimize PEEP. PEEP titration may be done with PEEP/FiO2 grid, targeted compliance, driving pressure, by using pressure-volume curve and stress index. Esophageal manometry and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume may be used if special equipment, machines, and expertise are available. No single method of PEEP titration has been shown to improve outcome. RM is characterised by sudden transient increase in transpulmonary pressure. Different RMs including high-frequency oscillator ventilation and prone position ventilation have been studied in adults and pediatric patients with very conflicting results and inconsistent survival benefits. Serious complications, hemodynamic instability, air leak syndrome, transient, or no improvements in oxygenation are reported. In this narrative review, we have discussed different methods of PEEP titration and RMs and available evidence for each especially in children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"145 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_52_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_52_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机械通气是急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的救命稻草。如果不明智和适当地使用这种模式,可能会导致呼吸机引起的肺损伤。肺保护性通气策略在成人和儿童重症监护室中经常实施。呼气末正压(PEEP)和复张动作(RM)用于“开放式肺通气”策略,以保持肺部开放。PEEP用于募集塌陷的肺泡,以改善氧合、顺应性、减少潮汐应力和肺部压力,并促进均匀的肺部通气。对于为特定患者设置“最佳PEEP”的方法没有达成一致。已发表的文献中描述了许多优化PEEP的方法。PEEP滴定可以使用PEEP/FiO2网格、目标顺应性、驱动压力,通过使用压力-体积曲线和应力指数来完成。如果有特殊的设备、机器和专业知识,可以使用食道测压和呼气末肺容量测量。没有任何单一的PEEP滴定方法可以改善结果。RM的特点是经肺压力突然短暂升高。已经在成人和儿童患者中研究了不同的RM,包括高频振荡通气和俯卧位通气,但结果非常矛盾,生存益处也不一致。严重并发症、血液动力学不稳定、漏气综合征、短暂性或氧合无改善的报道。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们讨论了PEEP滴定和RMs的不同方法,以及每种方法的可用证据,尤其是在儿童中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of positive end-expiratory pressure titration and recruitment maneuvers in pediatric intensive care unit – A narrative review
Mechanical ventilation is a lifesaving support for patients suffering with acute respiratory distress syndrome. This modality is likely to cause ventilator-induced lung injury if not used judiciously and appropriately. Lung protective ventilation strategy is routinely practiced in adult and pediatric intensive care units. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are used in “Open Lung Ventilation” strategy and to keep the lung open. PEEP is applied to recruit collapsed alveoli to improve oxygenation, compliance, reduce tidal stress, and strain on the lungs and to promote homogenous lung ventilation. There is no agreement on methods to set “Best PEEP” for a particular patient. There are many approaches described in published literature to optimize PEEP. PEEP titration may be done with PEEP/FiO2 grid, targeted compliance, driving pressure, by using pressure-volume curve and stress index. Esophageal manometry and measurement of end-expiratory lung volume may be used if special equipment, machines, and expertise are available. No single method of PEEP titration has been shown to improve outcome. RM is characterised by sudden transient increase in transpulmonary pressure. Different RMs including high-frequency oscillator ventilation and prone position ventilation have been studied in adults and pediatric patients with very conflicting results and inconsistent survival benefits. Serious complications, hemodynamic instability, air leak syndrome, transient, or no improvements in oxygenation are reported. In this narrative review, we have discussed different methods of PEEP titration and RMs and available evidence for each especially in children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信