双谱指数监测对高危患者危重事件发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验

N. Trembach
{"title":"双谱指数监测对高危患者危重事件发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验","authors":"N. Trembach","doi":"10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-1-48-61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The likelihood of intraoperative critical incidents depends largely on reflex control of the cardiorespiratory system that is often susceptible to chronic pathology. The reflex suppression may link to the depth of anaesthesia, making the latter monitoring particularly important at higher hypotension risks and their patient predisposition.Objectives. A study of the effect of bispectral index anaesthesia monitoring on critical incidents (CIs) rate in high-risk abdominal surgery patients.Methods. A randomised controlled trial enrolled 80 high-risk and 80 low-risk patients. Each cohort randomly allocated patients between subcohorts (by 40 people): 1 — anaesthesia rendered to maintain a 40–60 bispectral index (treatment cohort), 2 — by clinical values and anaesthetic level control in exhaled gas (control cohort), intraoperative control of anaesthetic requirement, bispectral index and critical incidents.Results. A critical incidents rate analysis in high-risk patients showed a lower rate in the bispectral index anaesthesia control cohort. Total 127 critical incidents were registered in 53 patients. The analysis revealed fewer CIs for objective sedation depth monitoring, 45% patients of treatment cohort vs. 87.5% in control. Significantly fewer (by half) patients exhibited hypotension in the treatment cohort, with lower (4-fold) rates of arrhythmia, bradycardia and general respiratory CIs. Anaesthetic doses and bispectral indices at anaesthesia stages were significantly lower in the treatment cohort as well.Conclusion. Objective anaesthesia depth monitoring in high-risk patients reduces the rates of haemodynamic incidents during anaesthesia maintenance and respiratory incidents at arousal due to prevention of excessive anaesthetic depth.","PeriodicalId":33483,"journal":{"name":"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of bispectral index monitoring on critical incidents rate in high-risk patients: a randomised controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"N. Trembach\",\"doi\":\"10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-1-48-61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. The likelihood of intraoperative critical incidents depends largely on reflex control of the cardiorespiratory system that is often susceptible to chronic pathology. The reflex suppression may link to the depth of anaesthesia, making the latter monitoring particularly important at higher hypotension risks and their patient predisposition.Objectives. A study of the effect of bispectral index anaesthesia monitoring on critical incidents (CIs) rate in high-risk abdominal surgery patients.Methods. A randomised controlled trial enrolled 80 high-risk and 80 low-risk patients. Each cohort randomly allocated patients between subcohorts (by 40 people): 1 — anaesthesia rendered to maintain a 40–60 bispectral index (treatment cohort), 2 — by clinical values and anaesthetic level control in exhaled gas (control cohort), intraoperative control of anaesthetic requirement, bispectral index and critical incidents.Results. A critical incidents rate analysis in high-risk patients showed a lower rate in the bispectral index anaesthesia control cohort. Total 127 critical incidents were registered in 53 patients. The analysis revealed fewer CIs for objective sedation depth monitoring, 45% patients of treatment cohort vs. 87.5% in control. Significantly fewer (by half) patients exhibited hypotension in the treatment cohort, with lower (4-fold) rates of arrhythmia, bradycardia and general respiratory CIs. Anaesthetic doses and bispectral indices at anaesthesia stages were significantly lower in the treatment cohort as well.Conclusion. Objective anaesthesia depth monitoring in high-risk patients reduces the rates of haemodynamic incidents during anaesthesia maintenance and respiratory incidents at arousal due to prevention of excessive anaesthetic depth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-1-48-61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kubanskii nauchnyi meditsinskii vestnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2022-29-1-48-61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。术中发生危重事件的可能性很大程度上取决于心肺系统的反射控制,而心肺系统往往易受慢性病理的影响。反射抑制可能与麻醉深度有关,这使得后一种监测在低血压风险和患者倾向较高的情况下尤为重要。双谱指数麻醉监测对腹部外科高危患者危重事件发生率的影响。一项随机对照试验招募了80名高风险和80名低风险患者。每个队列随机分配患者至亚队列(每组40人):1 -麻醉给予维持40 - 60双谱指数(治疗组),2 -通过临床值和呼出气体麻醉水平控制(对照组),术中麻醉需求控制,双谱指数和危重事件。高危患者的严重事件发生率分析显示,双谱指数麻醉对照组的发生率较低。53例患者共发生127例危重事件。分析显示,客观镇静深度监测的ci较少,治疗组为45%,对照组为87.5%。在治疗队列中,出现低血压的患者明显减少(一半),心律失常、心动过缓和一般呼吸CIs的发生率较低(4倍)。治疗组麻醉阶段的麻醉剂量和双谱指数均明显低于对照组。对高危患者进行客观麻醉深度监测,可防止麻醉深度过深,从而降低麻醉维持期间的血流动力学事件发生率和唤醒时的呼吸事件发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of bispectral index monitoring on critical incidents rate in high-risk patients: a randomised controlled trial
Background. The likelihood of intraoperative critical incidents depends largely on reflex control of the cardiorespiratory system that is often susceptible to chronic pathology. The reflex suppression may link to the depth of anaesthesia, making the latter monitoring particularly important at higher hypotension risks and their patient predisposition.Objectives. A study of the effect of bispectral index anaesthesia monitoring on critical incidents (CIs) rate in high-risk abdominal surgery patients.Methods. A randomised controlled trial enrolled 80 high-risk and 80 low-risk patients. Each cohort randomly allocated patients between subcohorts (by 40 people): 1 — anaesthesia rendered to maintain a 40–60 bispectral index (treatment cohort), 2 — by clinical values and anaesthetic level control in exhaled gas (control cohort), intraoperative control of anaesthetic requirement, bispectral index and critical incidents.Results. A critical incidents rate analysis in high-risk patients showed a lower rate in the bispectral index anaesthesia control cohort. Total 127 critical incidents were registered in 53 patients. The analysis revealed fewer CIs for objective sedation depth monitoring, 45% patients of treatment cohort vs. 87.5% in control. Significantly fewer (by half) patients exhibited hypotension in the treatment cohort, with lower (4-fold) rates of arrhythmia, bradycardia and general respiratory CIs. Anaesthetic doses and bispectral indices at anaesthesia stages were significantly lower in the treatment cohort as well.Conclusion. Objective anaesthesia depth monitoring in high-risk patients reduces the rates of haemodynamic incidents during anaesthesia maintenance and respiratory incidents at arousal due to prevention of excessive anaesthetic depth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信