私募股权项目广度和战略资产配置

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Alexander Rudin, Jason Mao, N. Zhang, A. Fink
{"title":"私募股权项目广度和战略资产配置","authors":"Alexander Rudin, Jason Mao, N. Zhang, A. Fink","doi":"10.3905/jpe.2019.22.2.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is quite often the case that investors form views on private equity program return and cash flow profiles by analyzing broad-based swaths of the private equity industry, while side-stepping idiosyncratic risks associated with narrower, realistic baskets of private equity pools. This article remedies this by performing an empirical analysis of private equity historical performance while accounting for program diversification. Comparing a private equity program to peer group averages is somewhat unfair, as such methodology favors larger programs, arguably without merit. The authors explain a way to correct for this bias. Finally, the authors present a probabilistic strategic asset allocation framework for private equity programs that help make informed trade-offs between breadth, strategy mix, and associated costs.","PeriodicalId":43579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Private Equity","volume":"22 1","pages":"19 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Private Equity Program Breadth and Strategic Asset Allocation\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Rudin, Jason Mao, N. Zhang, A. Fink\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpe.2019.22.2.019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is quite often the case that investors form views on private equity program return and cash flow profiles by analyzing broad-based swaths of the private equity industry, while side-stepping idiosyncratic risks associated with narrower, realistic baskets of private equity pools. This article remedies this by performing an empirical analysis of private equity historical performance while accounting for program diversification. Comparing a private equity program to peer group averages is somewhat unfair, as such methodology favors larger programs, arguably without merit. The authors explain a way to correct for this bias. Finally, the authors present a probabilistic strategic asset allocation framework for private equity programs that help make informed trade-offs between breadth, strategy mix, and associated costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Private Equity\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Private Equity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2019.22.2.019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Private Equity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpe.2019.22.2.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常情况下,投资者通过分析私募股权行业的广泛领域,对私募股权项目的回报和现金流状况形成看法,同时回避与更窄、更现实的私募股权池篮子相关的特殊风险。本文通过在考虑项目多元化的同时对私募股权的历史表现进行实证分析来弥补这一点。将私募股权项目与同行群体的平均水平进行比较有点不公平,因为这种方法有利于更大的项目,可以说毫无价值。作者解释了一种纠正这种偏见的方法。最后,作者提出了一个用于私募股权项目的概率战略资产配置框架,该框架有助于在广度、战略组合和相关成本之间进行明智的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Private Equity Program Breadth and Strategic Asset Allocation
It is quite often the case that investors form views on private equity program return and cash flow profiles by analyzing broad-based swaths of the private equity industry, while side-stepping idiosyncratic risks associated with narrower, realistic baskets of private equity pools. This article remedies this by performing an empirical analysis of private equity historical performance while accounting for program diversification. Comparing a private equity program to peer group averages is somewhat unfair, as such methodology favors larger programs, arguably without merit. The authors explain a way to correct for this bias. Finally, the authors present a probabilistic strategic asset allocation framework for private equity programs that help make informed trade-offs between breadth, strategy mix, and associated costs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Private Equity
Journal of Private Equity BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Private Equity (JPE) gives you in-depth analysis of today"s most innovative strategies and techniques in private equity and venture capital. It shows you the what, how and why of successful deals with detailed explanations, probing analysis, and real-life case studies—and shows you how to immediately apply them to your own deals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信