气候变化和代际公平的逆转:现在的成本问题,以后的收益

IF 0.9 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gareth Davies
{"title":"气候变化和代际公平的逆转:现在的成本问题,以后的收益","authors":"Gareth Davies","doi":"10.1163/18786561-10030002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nClimate change is often seen as an issue of intergenerational equity—consumption now creates costs for future generations. However, radical mitigation now would reverse the problem, creating immediate costs for current generations, while the benefits would be primarily for future ones. This is a policy problem, as persuading those living now to bear the cost of changes whose benefits will mostly accrue after their deaths is politically difficult. The policy challenge is then how to temporally match costs to benefits, either by deferring mitigation costs, or by speeding up climatic benefits. Geoengineering may provide some help here, as it might enable climate change to be slowed more immediately, at a lower upfront cost, and allow a greater share of the mitigation and adaptation burden to be passed on to those in the future who will benefit most.","PeriodicalId":38485,"journal":{"name":"Climate Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18786561-10030002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Change and Reversed Intergenerational Equity: the Problem of Costs Now, for Benefits Later\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18786561-10030002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nClimate change is often seen as an issue of intergenerational equity—consumption now creates costs for future generations. However, radical mitigation now would reverse the problem, creating immediate costs for current generations, while the benefits would be primarily for future ones. This is a policy problem, as persuading those living now to bear the cost of changes whose benefits will mostly accrue after their deaths is politically difficult. The policy challenge is then how to temporally match costs to benefits, either by deferring mitigation costs, or by speeding up climatic benefits. Geoengineering may provide some help here, as it might enable climate change to be slowed more immediately, at a lower upfront cost, and allow a greater share of the mitigation and adaptation burden to be passed on to those in the future who will benefit most.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Climate Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/18786561-10030002\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Climate Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-10030002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climate Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-10030002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

气候变化通常被视为代际公平问题——现在的消费给后代带来了成本。然而,现在采取激进的缓解措施将扭转这一问题,使当代人立即付出代价,而收益主要是留给子孙后代。这是一个政策问题,因为说服那些现在活着的人承担变革的成本在政治上是困难的,而这些变革的好处大多是在他们死后才会产生的。因此,政策上的挑战是如何在短期内使成本与收益相匹配,要么推迟减排成本,要么加快气候效益。地球工程可能在这方面提供一些帮助,因为它可以以较低的前期成本更迅速地减缓气候变化,并允许将更大份额的缓解和适应负担转嫁给未来受益最大的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Climate Change and Reversed Intergenerational Equity: the Problem of Costs Now, for Benefits Later
Climate change is often seen as an issue of intergenerational equity—consumption now creates costs for future generations. However, radical mitigation now would reverse the problem, creating immediate costs for current generations, while the benefits would be primarily for future ones. This is a policy problem, as persuading those living now to bear the cost of changes whose benefits will mostly accrue after their deaths is politically difficult. The policy challenge is then how to temporally match costs to benefits, either by deferring mitigation costs, or by speeding up climatic benefits. Geoengineering may provide some help here, as it might enable climate change to be slowed more immediately, at a lower upfront cost, and allow a greater share of the mitigation and adaptation burden to be passed on to those in the future who will benefit most.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Climate Law
Climate Law Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信