COVID-19大流行期间的妊娠结局:基于斯里兰卡三级护理医院的研究

Ratnayake Thumula, Bandara Dompege Don Dananjaya Srimal, Bandara Mohottalalage Sunethra Sandhya Kumari
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间的妊娠结局:基于斯里兰卡三级护理医院的研究","authors":"Ratnayake Thumula, Bandara Dompege Don Dananjaya Srimal, Bandara Mohottalalage Sunethra Sandhya Kumari","doi":"10.23937/2474-3658/1510290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic response affected maternal and neonatal health services worldwide. This study aimed to explore the impact of the pandemic on pregnancy outcomes, such as monthly stillbirth rates, percentage of monthly lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS), percentage of monthly preterm births, and percentage of monthly neonatal unit admissions at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. The study was conducted as a retrospective medical record-based study and included a total of 28,292 deliveries from January 2018 to November 2021 at the same tertiary care center. These deliveries were divided into pre-pandemic and during-pandemic deliveries for analysis. The period before the first case of COVID-19 was reported in March 2020 was considered pre-pandemic, while the period after was considered during-pandemic. Statistical analysis was then performed on the above parameters to compare pre-pandemic rates to during-pandemic rates. Increased maternal stress during the pandemic, lockdown measures and movement restrictions, reluctance to obtain hospital treatment when required due to fear of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 infection of mothers were expected to affect pregnancy outcomes during the pandemic period. The pre-pandemic monthly average stillbirth rate was 9.58 per thousand live births versus the post-pandemic rate of 9.67 per thousand live births. The monthly average LSCS percentage was 49.5% during both periods. The monthly average preterm birth rate decreased from 13.6% to 12.92% during the pandemic, while the monthly average neonatal unit admission rate decreased from 13.3% to 11.37% during the pandemic. The Pearson correlation test confirmed that the monthly LSCS rate is moderately correlated with the monthly preterm rate and monthly stillbirth rate, indicating a positive correlation. The Welch's t test was used to determine the statistical significance of these mean differences between pre-pandemic and during-pandemic, and none of the mean differences in the monthly stillbirth rate, LSCS percentage, preterm birth percentage, or neonatal unit admission percentage were statistically significant (p > 0.05). The F test indicates that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the variances of the two batches of the pre-pandemic and during-pandemic periods are equal at the 3% significance level.","PeriodicalId":93465,"journal":{"name":"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pregnancy Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study Based on a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka\",\"authors\":\"Ratnayake Thumula, Bandara Dompege Don Dananjaya Srimal, Bandara Mohottalalage Sunethra Sandhya Kumari\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2474-3658/1510290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic response affected maternal and neonatal health services worldwide. This study aimed to explore the impact of the pandemic on pregnancy outcomes, such as monthly stillbirth rates, percentage of monthly lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS), percentage of monthly preterm births, and percentage of monthly neonatal unit admissions at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. The study was conducted as a retrospective medical record-based study and included a total of 28,292 deliveries from January 2018 to November 2021 at the same tertiary care center. These deliveries were divided into pre-pandemic and during-pandemic deliveries for analysis. The period before the first case of COVID-19 was reported in March 2020 was considered pre-pandemic, while the period after was considered during-pandemic. Statistical analysis was then performed on the above parameters to compare pre-pandemic rates to during-pandemic rates. Increased maternal stress during the pandemic, lockdown measures and movement restrictions, reluctance to obtain hospital treatment when required due to fear of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 infection of mothers were expected to affect pregnancy outcomes during the pandemic period. The pre-pandemic monthly average stillbirth rate was 9.58 per thousand live births versus the post-pandemic rate of 9.67 per thousand live births. The monthly average LSCS percentage was 49.5% during both periods. The monthly average preterm birth rate decreased from 13.6% to 12.92% during the pandemic, while the monthly average neonatal unit admission rate decreased from 13.3% to 11.37% during the pandemic. The Pearson correlation test confirmed that the monthly LSCS rate is moderately correlated with the monthly preterm rate and monthly stillbirth rate, indicating a positive correlation. The Welch's t test was used to determine the statistical significance of these mean differences between pre-pandemic and during-pandemic, and none of the mean differences in the monthly stillbirth rate, LSCS percentage, preterm birth percentage, or neonatal unit admission percentage were statistically significant (p > 0.05). The F test indicates that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the variances of the two batches of the pre-pandemic and during-pandemic periods are equal at the 3% significance level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510290\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of infectious diseases and epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pregnancy Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study Based on a Tertiary Care Hospital in Sri Lanka
The COVID-19 pandemic response affected maternal and neonatal health services worldwide. This study aimed to explore the impact of the pandemic on pregnancy outcomes, such as monthly stillbirth rates, percentage of monthly lower segment cesarean sections (LSCS), percentage of monthly preterm births, and percentage of monthly neonatal unit admissions at a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka. The study was conducted as a retrospective medical record-based study and included a total of 28,292 deliveries from January 2018 to November 2021 at the same tertiary care center. These deliveries were divided into pre-pandemic and during-pandemic deliveries for analysis. The period before the first case of COVID-19 was reported in March 2020 was considered pre-pandemic, while the period after was considered during-pandemic. Statistical analysis was then performed on the above parameters to compare pre-pandemic rates to during-pandemic rates. Increased maternal stress during the pandemic, lockdown measures and movement restrictions, reluctance to obtain hospital treatment when required due to fear of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 infection of mothers were expected to affect pregnancy outcomes during the pandemic period. The pre-pandemic monthly average stillbirth rate was 9.58 per thousand live births versus the post-pandemic rate of 9.67 per thousand live births. The monthly average LSCS percentage was 49.5% during both periods. The monthly average preterm birth rate decreased from 13.6% to 12.92% during the pandemic, while the monthly average neonatal unit admission rate decreased from 13.3% to 11.37% during the pandemic. The Pearson correlation test confirmed that the monthly LSCS rate is moderately correlated with the monthly preterm rate and monthly stillbirth rate, indicating a positive correlation. The Welch's t test was used to determine the statistical significance of these mean differences between pre-pandemic and during-pandemic, and none of the mean differences in the monthly stillbirth rate, LSCS percentage, preterm birth percentage, or neonatal unit admission percentage were statistically significant (p > 0.05). The F test indicates that there is not enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the variances of the two batches of the pre-pandemic and during-pandemic periods are equal at the 3% significance level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信