{"title":"继续护理教育的伦理判断能力现状与伦理培养","authors":"E. Yoshioka, S. Kaneko","doi":"10.15344/2394-4978/2019/305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The present paper elucidates the current status of ethical judgment capacity and nursing ethics in relation to continuous nursing education, while further examining the ideal direction for future educational ventures. Method: We searched the Igaku Chuo Zasshi, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for the time period between 2008 and 2018. The keywords used were “nursing ethics,” “nursing practice,” “ethical education,” and “nurses,” restricting the search to research articles focusing on nurses working in hospital wings (excluding nursing managerial positions). Results: A total of 22 papers were extracted. The capacity to make ethical judgments during continuous nursing education corresponds to Article 1 through 11 of the Code of Ethics from the Japanese Nursing Association. Assessed levels included awareness, judgment, and action. In terms of the clinical ladder for nurses, ladders I, II, and IV were observed. In Japan, literature on ethics education for nurses primarily comprised case studies, while papers in foreign countries carried out education through expert knowledge, namely by placing nursing ethics scholars in the hospital. Conclusion: Currently, the capacity for nurses to make ethical judgments does not cover the entire Code of Ethics, and ethics education is not being provided according to all clinical ladder stages. Thus, future work will need to devise a step-wise educational program that can continuously provide adequate ethics training.","PeriodicalId":91514,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Current Status of Ethical Judgment Capacity and Ethical Training Regarding Continuous Nursing Education\",\"authors\":\"E. Yoshioka, S. Kaneko\",\"doi\":\"10.15344/2394-4978/2019/305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The present paper elucidates the current status of ethical judgment capacity and nursing ethics in relation to continuous nursing education, while further examining the ideal direction for future educational ventures. Method: We searched the Igaku Chuo Zasshi, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for the time period between 2008 and 2018. The keywords used were “nursing ethics,” “nursing practice,” “ethical education,” and “nurses,” restricting the search to research articles focusing on nurses working in hospital wings (excluding nursing managerial positions). Results: A total of 22 papers were extracted. The capacity to make ethical judgments during continuous nursing education corresponds to Article 1 through 11 of the Code of Ethics from the Japanese Nursing Association. Assessed levels included awareness, judgment, and action. In terms of the clinical ladder for nurses, ladders I, II, and IV were observed. In Japan, literature on ethics education for nurses primarily comprised case studies, while papers in foreign countries carried out education through expert knowledge, namely by placing nursing ethics scholars in the hospital. Conclusion: Currently, the capacity for nurses to make ethical judgments does not cover the entire Code of Ethics, and ethics education is not being provided according to all clinical ladder stages. Thus, future work will need to devise a step-wise educational program that can continuously provide adequate ethics training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of nursing & clinical practices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of nursing & clinical practices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2019/305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nursing & clinical practices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15344/2394-4978/2019/305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:本文阐述了与护理继续教育相关的伦理判断能力和护理伦理的现状,并进一步探讨了未来教育事业的理想方向。方法:检索Igaku Chuo Zasshi、MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库,检索时间为2008 - 2018年。使用的关键词是“护理伦理”、“护理实践”、“伦理教育”和“护士”,将搜索限制在专注于在医院工作的护士(不包括护理管理职位)的研究文章。结果:共提取论文22篇。在护理持续教育中进行道德判断的能力符合日本护理协会的道德准则第1条至第11条。评估的水平包括意识、判断和行动。护士的临床阶梯分为一级、二级和四级。在日本,关于护士伦理教育的文献主要以案例研究为主,而国外的文献则通过专家知识的方式进行教育,即将护理伦理学者安置在医院。结论:目前,护士的伦理判断能力未覆盖整个《伦理规范》,未按临床各阶梯阶段进行伦理教育。因此,未来的工作将需要设计一个循序渐进的教育计划,可以持续提供足够的道德培训。
The Current Status of Ethical Judgment Capacity and Ethical Training Regarding Continuous Nursing Education
Background: The present paper elucidates the current status of ethical judgment capacity and nursing ethics in relation to continuous nursing education, while further examining the ideal direction for future educational ventures. Method: We searched the Igaku Chuo Zasshi, MEDLINE, and CINAHL databases for the time period between 2008 and 2018. The keywords used were “nursing ethics,” “nursing practice,” “ethical education,” and “nurses,” restricting the search to research articles focusing on nurses working in hospital wings (excluding nursing managerial positions). Results: A total of 22 papers were extracted. The capacity to make ethical judgments during continuous nursing education corresponds to Article 1 through 11 of the Code of Ethics from the Japanese Nursing Association. Assessed levels included awareness, judgment, and action. In terms of the clinical ladder for nurses, ladders I, II, and IV were observed. In Japan, literature on ethics education for nurses primarily comprised case studies, while papers in foreign countries carried out education through expert knowledge, namely by placing nursing ethics scholars in the hospital. Conclusion: Currently, the capacity for nurses to make ethical judgments does not cover the entire Code of Ethics, and ethics education is not being provided according to all clinical ladder stages. Thus, future work will need to devise a step-wise educational program that can continuously provide adequate ethics training.