层次分析法在员工奖金决策支持系统中的应用

Q3 Engineering
Devi Yuliana, F. Ayu, Ibnu Mas'ud, Fuji Hidayat, Silmi Alfadri
{"title":"层次分析法在员工奖金决策支持系统中的应用","authors":"Devi Yuliana, F. Ayu, Ibnu Mas'ud, Fuji Hidayat, Silmi Alfadri","doi":"10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having the best employee selection decisions on the CV. Multi Citra Agung, the writers assisted the company employing a method by developing a waterfall system. The method was carried out through this research process by designing stages of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) system. The occurred problems found were decisions that were not as expected and the lack of an objective attitude in decision making, due to the absence of a special process for evaluating employees in awarding bonuses of Multi Citra Agung by still using conventional systems. The study was conducted to select employees who are entitled to bonuses using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. A multi-criteria decision making process is to determine the best choice of a number of alternatives for employee performance appraisal based on attendance, discipline, communication and employee performance. The results of this research give the best ranking of employees by displaying an assessment of 6 employees in the form of criteria, total value and information of employees who are entitled to a bonus. For employees who are entitled to get a bonus which is 1 employee who fulfills a very satisfactory level with a range of 0.28 - 0.50.","PeriodicalId":34350,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Decision Support System For Employee’s Bonus Using Analitycal Hierarchy Process Method\",\"authors\":\"Devi Yuliana, F. Ayu, Ibnu Mas'ud, Fuji Hidayat, Silmi Alfadri\",\"doi\":\"10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Having the best employee selection decisions on the CV. Multi Citra Agung, the writers assisted the company employing a method by developing a waterfall system. The method was carried out through this research process by designing stages of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) system. The occurred problems found were decisions that were not as expected and the lack of an objective attitude in decision making, due to the absence of a special process for evaluating employees in awarding bonuses of Multi Citra Agung by still using conventional systems. The study was conducted to select employees who are entitled to bonuses using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. A multi-criteria decision making process is to determine the best choice of a number of alternatives for employee performance appraisal based on attendance, discipline, communication and employee performance. The results of this research give the best ranking of employees by displaying an assessment of 6 employees in the form of criteria, total value and information of employees who are entitled to a bonus. For employees who are entitled to get a bonus which is 1 employee who fulfills a very satisfactory level with a range of 0.28 - 0.50.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v4i1.1181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在简历上有最好的员工选择决定。Multi Citra Agung,作者通过开发瀑布系统来帮助公司采用一种方法。该方法是通过统一建模语言(UML)系统的设计阶段来实现的。所发现的问题是决策不如预期,决策过程中缺乏客观态度,因为在授予Multi Citra Agung奖金时,仍使用传统系统,缺乏评估员工的特殊流程。本研究采用层次分析法(AHP)选择有权获得奖金的员工。多标准决策过程是根据出勤率、纪律、沟通和员工表现,确定员工绩效评估的多种备选方案中的最佳选择。这项研究的结果通过以标准、总价值和有权获得奖金的员工信息的形式显示对6名员工的评估,给出了员工的最佳排名。对于有权获得奖金的员工,即1名员工达到了0.28-0.50的非常满意的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Decision Support System For Employee’s Bonus Using Analitycal Hierarchy Process Method
Having the best employee selection decisions on the CV. Multi Citra Agung, the writers assisted the company employing a method by developing a waterfall system. The method was carried out through this research process by designing stages of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) system. The occurred problems found were decisions that were not as expected and the lack of an objective attitude in decision making, due to the absence of a special process for evaluating employees in awarding bonuses of Multi Citra Agung by still using conventional systems. The study was conducted to select employees who are entitled to bonuses using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. A multi-criteria decision making process is to determine the best choice of a number of alternatives for employee performance appraisal based on attendance, discipline, communication and employee performance. The results of this research give the best ranking of employees by displaying an assessment of 6 employees in the form of criteria, total value and information of employees who are entitled to a bonus. For employees who are entitled to get a bonus which is 1 employee who fulfills a very satisfactory level with a range of 0.28 - 0.50.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信