世界各地年轻人的经济能力

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
R. Happ, M. Pilz
{"title":"世界各地年轻人的经济能力","authors":"R. Happ, M. Pilz","doi":"10.1177/17454999221103092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Young adults around the world face many similar challenges. This also applies, among others, to the field of economic thinking. On the one hand, young adults have to make various economic decisions on a daily basis, for example, when shopping. On the other hand, they are confronted in various ways with different areas of economics in relation to their choice of career. As a result, a growing interest in teaching issues such as basic economic knowledge, financial literacy, or pre-vocational education (Pilz et al., 2014, 2016) and also a more in-depth assessments of the economic competences of young adults embedded in an international comparison are increasingly emerging (Happ et al., 2021; Happ and Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, 2021; Siegfried and Walstad, 2014). The fact that there is an empirically valid, comparable construct is not a sufficient basis for a comprehensive international comparison. It should rather be the educational problems of the countries that provide the starting point for comparison. In particular, globalization developments in economic competences and common challenges in promoting these competences have motivated several comparative studies (Walstad et al., 2013; Wuttke et al., 2016). The eight studies in this issue combine the testing of economic competences with a detailed comparative analysis, including ideographic aspects (Hilker, 1962). This is the basis for “real” comparative analyses (Evans, 2020; Pilz, 2012). The combination of significant empirical results and an in-depth comparative analysis is the innovative core of the research. Therefore, the focus of the issue is on comparative papers on the economic competences of young adults from 14 countries. The eight papers are always ideographically embedded and the findings are discussed and compared in a profound manner. The link between all papers is the topic of economic competence. According to internationally well-recognized definition Weinert (2001), competence can be understood as the available or learnable cognitive abilities and skills required to successfully cope with economic problems and questions. This competent handling of problems also includes the motivational and volitional willingness and abilities associated with cognitive dispositions to deal with the problem. In the context of economics and thus of these issues, the focus is on the skills and abilities required to","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"17 1","pages":"149 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic competences of young adults around the world\",\"authors\":\"R. Happ, M. Pilz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17454999221103092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Young adults around the world face many similar challenges. This also applies, among others, to the field of economic thinking. On the one hand, young adults have to make various economic decisions on a daily basis, for example, when shopping. On the other hand, they are confronted in various ways with different areas of economics in relation to their choice of career. As a result, a growing interest in teaching issues such as basic economic knowledge, financial literacy, or pre-vocational education (Pilz et al., 2014, 2016) and also a more in-depth assessments of the economic competences of young adults embedded in an international comparison are increasingly emerging (Happ et al., 2021; Happ and Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, 2021; Siegfried and Walstad, 2014). The fact that there is an empirically valid, comparable construct is not a sufficient basis for a comprehensive international comparison. It should rather be the educational problems of the countries that provide the starting point for comparison. In particular, globalization developments in economic competences and common challenges in promoting these competences have motivated several comparative studies (Walstad et al., 2013; Wuttke et al., 2016). The eight studies in this issue combine the testing of economic competences with a detailed comparative analysis, including ideographic aspects (Hilker, 1962). This is the basis for “real” comparative analyses (Evans, 2020; Pilz, 2012). The combination of significant empirical results and an in-depth comparative analysis is the innovative core of the research. Therefore, the focus of the issue is on comparative papers on the economic competences of young adults from 14 countries. The eight papers are always ideographically embedded and the findings are discussed and compared in a profound manner. The link between all papers is the topic of economic competence. According to internationally well-recognized definition Weinert (2001), competence can be understood as the available or learnable cognitive abilities and skills required to successfully cope with economic problems and questions. This competent handling of problems also includes the motivational and volitional willingness and abilities associated with cognitive dispositions to deal with the problem. In the context of economics and thus of these issues, the focus is on the skills and abilities required to\",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"149 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221103092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221103092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

世界各地的年轻人面临着许多类似的挑战。除其他外,这也适用于经济思维领域。一方面,年轻人每天都要做各种各样的经济决策,比如购物。另一方面,他们以各种方式面对与职业选择有关的不同经济学领域。因此,对基础经济知识、金融素养或职业前教育等教学问题的兴趣日益浓厚(Pilz等人,2014年,2016年),以及对国际比较中年轻人经济能力的更深入评估也越来越多地出现(Happ等人,2021年;Happ and Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, 2021;Siegfried and Walstad, 2014)。有一个经验上有效的、可比较的结构,这一事实并不是进行全面国际比较的充分基础。相反,应该是各国的教育问题提供比较的起点。特别是,经济能力的全球化发展和促进这些能力的共同挑战激发了一些比较研究(Walstad et al., 2013;Wuttke等人,2016)。本期的八项研究将经济能力的测试与详细的比较分析结合起来,包括表意文字方面(Hilker, 1962)。这是“真正的”比较分析的基础(Evans, 2020;Pilz, 2012)。将显著的实证结果与深入的比较分析相结合是本研究的创新核心。因此,这个问题的重点是关于14个国家的年轻人经济能力的比较论文。这八篇论文总是以表意文字形式嵌入,并以深刻的方式讨论和比较研究结果。所有论文之间的联系是经济能力的主题。根据国际公认的定义Weinert(2001),能力可以被理解为成功应对经济问题所需的可用或可学习的认知能力和技能。这种对问题的称职处理还包括与处理问题的认知倾向相关的动机和意志意愿和能力。在经济学和这些问题的背景下,重点是所需的技能和能力
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic competences of young adults around the world
Young adults around the world face many similar challenges. This also applies, among others, to the field of economic thinking. On the one hand, young adults have to make various economic decisions on a daily basis, for example, when shopping. On the other hand, they are confronted in various ways with different areas of economics in relation to their choice of career. As a result, a growing interest in teaching issues such as basic economic knowledge, financial literacy, or pre-vocational education (Pilz et al., 2014, 2016) and also a more in-depth assessments of the economic competences of young adults embedded in an international comparison are increasingly emerging (Happ et al., 2021; Happ and Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, 2021; Siegfried and Walstad, 2014). The fact that there is an empirically valid, comparable construct is not a sufficient basis for a comprehensive international comparison. It should rather be the educational problems of the countries that provide the starting point for comparison. In particular, globalization developments in economic competences and common challenges in promoting these competences have motivated several comparative studies (Walstad et al., 2013; Wuttke et al., 2016). The eight studies in this issue combine the testing of economic competences with a detailed comparative analysis, including ideographic aspects (Hilker, 1962). This is the basis for “real” comparative analyses (Evans, 2020; Pilz, 2012). The combination of significant empirical results and an in-depth comparative analysis is the innovative core of the research. Therefore, the focus of the issue is on comparative papers on the economic competences of young adults from 14 countries. The eight papers are always ideographically embedded and the findings are discussed and compared in a profound manner. The link between all papers is the topic of economic competence. According to internationally well-recognized definition Weinert (2001), competence can be understood as the available or learnable cognitive abilities and skills required to successfully cope with economic problems and questions. This competent handling of problems also includes the motivational and volitional willingness and abilities associated with cognitive dispositions to deal with the problem. In the context of economics and thus of these issues, the focus is on the skills and abilities required to
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信