托伐普坦对有充血性体征的心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析

Mei Zeng, Na Li, Tongshuai Chen, Y. Ti, Chunmei Zhang, Peili Bu
{"title":"托伐普坦对有充血性体征的心力衰竭患者的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析","authors":"Mei Zeng, Na Li, Tongshuai Chen, Y. Ti, Chunmei Zhang, Peili Bu","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan, as well as the impact of its treatment dose and duration in heart failure patients with congestive signs. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to collect data from all randomized controlled trials (RCT) examining the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with congestive signs compared with placebo or blank control until March 4, 2021. Urine volume, change in body weight, improvement in dyspnea, and reduction of edema were evaluated as efficacy indicators. All-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, and adverse events were considered safety indicators. The quality of eligible publications was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias for RCTs. Results: Ten RCTs with 5,980 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with control, tolvaptan significantly reduced weight in the short term (day 1, 7 RCTs, weighted mean difference (WMD): –1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): –1.27 to –0.91; day 2, 2 RCTs, WMD: –1.67, 95% CI: –3.00 to –0.33; day 7, 4 RCTs, WMD: –0.95, 95% CI: –1.25 to –0.66), increased urine volume (WMD: 1,825.72, 95% CI: 1,438.38–2,213.07), and relieved dyspnea (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.19) without increasing the mortality rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87–1.06). Furthermore, the weight loss and increase in urine volume were not dose-dependent effects, and prolonged medication did not lead to sustained weight loss. In addition, there seemed to be more adverse events (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03–1.32) after treatment with tolvaptan. Further analysis revealed that patients treated with tolvaptan were more likely to report thirst (RR: 6.09, 95% CI: 3.37–11.00) and dry mouth (RR: 6.36, 95% CI: 4.09–9.90), as well as develop hypernatremia (RR: 12.76, 95% CI: 3.52–46.32). Conclusions: The meta-analysis shows that tolvaptan can improve congestion with no increase in mortality rate, but should be used to guard against adverse events. Deserve to be mentioned, the number of RCTs included was limited, suggesting that the observed results should be interpreted with caution. Additional robust clinical studies are warranted to validate the present findings.","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Heart Failure Patients with Congestive Signs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials\",\"authors\":\"Mei Zeng, Na Li, Tongshuai Chen, Y. Ti, Chunmei Zhang, Peili Bu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan, as well as the impact of its treatment dose and duration in heart failure patients with congestive signs. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to collect data from all randomized controlled trials (RCT) examining the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with congestive signs compared with placebo or blank control until March 4, 2021. Urine volume, change in body weight, improvement in dyspnea, and reduction of edema were evaluated as efficacy indicators. All-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, and adverse events were considered safety indicators. The quality of eligible publications was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias for RCTs. Results: Ten RCTs with 5,980 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with control, tolvaptan significantly reduced weight in the short term (day 1, 7 RCTs, weighted mean difference (WMD): –1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): –1.27 to –0.91; day 2, 2 RCTs, WMD: –1.67, 95% CI: –3.00 to –0.33; day 7, 4 RCTs, WMD: –0.95, 95% CI: –1.25 to –0.66), increased urine volume (WMD: 1,825.72, 95% CI: 1,438.38–2,213.07), and relieved dyspnea (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.19) without increasing the mortality rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87–1.06). Furthermore, the weight loss and increase in urine volume were not dose-dependent effects, and prolonged medication did not lead to sustained weight loss. In addition, there seemed to be more adverse events (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03–1.32) after treatment with tolvaptan. Further analysis revealed that patients treated with tolvaptan were more likely to report thirst (RR: 6.09, 95% CI: 3.37–11.00) and dry mouth (RR: 6.36, 95% CI: 4.09–9.90), as well as develop hypernatremia (RR: 12.76, 95% CI: 3.52–46.32). Conclusions: The meta-analysis shows that tolvaptan can improve congestion with no increase in mortality rate, but should be used to guard against adverse events. Deserve to be mentioned, the number of RCTs included was limited, suggesting that the observed results should be interpreted with caution. Additional robust clinical studies are warranted to validate the present findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology discovery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology discovery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨托伐普坦治疗心力衰竭伴充血性体征患者的疗效和安全性,以及治疗剂量和持续时间的影响。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,收集截至2021年3月4日的所有随机对照试验(RCT)的数据,这些试验检验了托伐普坦与安慰剂或空白对照相比在有充血性体征的心力衰竭患者中的疗效和安全性。以尿量、体重变化、呼吸困难改善和水肿减少作为疗效指标。全因死亡率、心力衰竭恶化和不良事件被认为是安全指标。使用Cochrane随机对照试验偏倚风险评估合格出版物的质量。结果:本分析纳入了10项随机对照试验,共5980例患者。与对照组相比,托伐普坦在短期内显著减轻体重(第1天,7个随机对照试验,加权平均差(WMD): -1.09, 95%可信区间(CI): -1.27至-0.91;第2天,2个随机对照试验,WMD: -1.67, 95% CI: -3.00 ~ -0.33;第7天,4项rct, WMD: -0.95, 95% CI: -1.25至-0.66),尿量增加(WMD: 1,825.72, 95% CI: 1,438.38-2,213.07),呼吸困难缓解(风险比(RR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19),但未增加死亡率(RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.06)。此外,体重减轻和尿量增加不是剂量依赖效应,长期用药不会导致持续的体重减轻。此外,托伐普坦治疗后似乎有更多的不良事件(RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32)。进一步分析显示,接受托伐普坦治疗的患者更有可能报告口渴(RR: 6.09, 95% CI: 3.37-11.00)和口干(RR: 6.36, 95% CI: 4.09-9.90),以及出现高钠血症(RR: 12.76, 95% CI: 3.52-46.32)。结论:荟萃分析显示,托伐普坦可以改善充血,但不增加死亡率,但应用于预防不良事件。值得一提的是,纳入的rct数量有限,提示观察结果应谨慎解释。需要进一步的临床研究来验证目前的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Heart Failure Patients with Congestive Signs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan, as well as the impact of its treatment dose and duration in heart failure patients with congestive signs. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched to collect data from all randomized controlled trials (RCT) examining the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in heart failure patients with congestive signs compared with placebo or blank control until March 4, 2021. Urine volume, change in body weight, improvement in dyspnea, and reduction of edema were evaluated as efficacy indicators. All-cause mortality, worsening heart failure, and adverse events were considered safety indicators. The quality of eligible publications was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias for RCTs. Results: Ten RCTs with 5,980 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with control, tolvaptan significantly reduced weight in the short term (day 1, 7 RCTs, weighted mean difference (WMD): –1.09, 95% confidence interval (CI): –1.27 to –0.91; day 2, 2 RCTs, WMD: –1.67, 95% CI: –3.00 to –0.33; day 7, 4 RCTs, WMD: –0.95, 95% CI: –1.25 to –0.66), increased urine volume (WMD: 1,825.72, 95% CI: 1,438.38–2,213.07), and relieved dyspnea (risk ratio (RR): 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05–1.19) without increasing the mortality rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87–1.06). Furthermore, the weight loss and increase in urine volume were not dose-dependent effects, and prolonged medication did not lead to sustained weight loss. In addition, there seemed to be more adverse events (RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.03–1.32) after treatment with tolvaptan. Further analysis revealed that patients treated with tolvaptan were more likely to report thirst (RR: 6.09, 95% CI: 3.37–11.00) and dry mouth (RR: 6.36, 95% CI: 4.09–9.90), as well as develop hypernatremia (RR: 12.76, 95% CI: 3.52–46.32). Conclusions: The meta-analysis shows that tolvaptan can improve congestion with no increase in mortality rate, but should be used to guard against adverse events. Deserve to be mentioned, the number of RCTs included was limited, suggesting that the observed results should be interpreted with caution. Additional robust clinical studies are warranted to validate the present findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信