A. Zhou, Zhiqiang Fu, X.-M. Cao, Yufen Zhao, Yong Wang
{"title":"难以捉摸的FeV(O)(TAML)反应中间体激活C−H键的机制转换:理论研究","authors":"A. Zhou, Zhiqiang Fu, X.-M. Cao, Yufen Zhao, Yong Wang","doi":"10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2111230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The divergent behavior of C−H bond oxidations of aliphatic substrates compared to those of aromatic substrates shown in Gupta's experiment was mechanistically studied herein by means of density functional theory calculations. Our calculations reveal that such difference is caused by different reaction mechanisms between two kinds of substrates (the aliphatic cyclohexane, 2,3-dimethylbutane and the aromatic toluene, ethylbenzene and cumene). For the aliphatic substrates, C−H oxidation by the oxidant FeV(O)(TAML) is a hydrogen atom transfer process; whereas for the aromatic substrates, C−H oxidation is a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process with a proton transfer character on the transition state, that is, a proton-coupled electron transfer process holding a proton transfer-like transition state (PCET(PT)). This difference is caused by the strong π− π interactions between the tetra-anionic TAML ring and the phenyl ring of the aromatic substrates, which has a “pull” effect to make the electron transfer from substrates to the Fe=O moiety inefficient.","PeriodicalId":10036,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mechanistic switch in C−H bond activation by elusive FeV(O)(TAML) reaction intermediate: A theoretical study\",\"authors\":\"A. Zhou, Zhiqiang Fu, X.-M. Cao, Yufen Zhao, Yong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2111230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The divergent behavior of C−H bond oxidations of aliphatic substrates compared to those of aromatic substrates shown in Gupta's experiment was mechanistically studied herein by means of density functional theory calculations. Our calculations reveal that such difference is caused by different reaction mechanisms between two kinds of substrates (the aliphatic cyclohexane, 2,3-dimethylbutane and the aromatic toluene, ethylbenzene and cumene). For the aliphatic substrates, C−H oxidation by the oxidant FeV(O)(TAML) is a hydrogen atom transfer process; whereas for the aromatic substrates, C−H oxidation is a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process with a proton transfer character on the transition state, that is, a proton-coupled electron transfer process holding a proton transfer-like transition state (PCET(PT)). This difference is caused by the strong π− π interactions between the tetra-anionic TAML ring and the phenyl ring of the aromatic substrates, which has a “pull” effect to make the electron transfer from substrates to the Fe=O moiety inefficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2111230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/1674-0068/cjcp2111230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A mechanistic switch in C−H bond activation by elusive FeV(O)(TAML) reaction intermediate: A theoretical study
The divergent behavior of C−H bond oxidations of aliphatic substrates compared to those of aromatic substrates shown in Gupta's experiment was mechanistically studied herein by means of density functional theory calculations. Our calculations reveal that such difference is caused by different reaction mechanisms between two kinds of substrates (the aliphatic cyclohexane, 2,3-dimethylbutane and the aromatic toluene, ethylbenzene and cumene). For the aliphatic substrates, C−H oxidation by the oxidant FeV(O)(TAML) is a hydrogen atom transfer process; whereas for the aromatic substrates, C−H oxidation is a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process with a proton transfer character on the transition state, that is, a proton-coupled electron transfer process holding a proton transfer-like transition state (PCET(PT)). This difference is caused by the strong π− π interactions between the tetra-anionic TAML ring and the phenyl ring of the aromatic substrates, which has a “pull” effect to make the electron transfer from substrates to the Fe=O moiety inefficient.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Chemical Physics (CJCP) aims to bridge atomic and molecular level research in broad scope for disciplines in chemistry, physics, material science and life sciences, including the following:
Theoretical Methods, Algorithms, Statistical and Quantum Chemistry
Gas Phase Dynamics and Structure: Spectroscopy, Molecular Interactions, Scattering, Photochemistry
Condensed Phase Dynamics, Structure, and Thermodynamics: Spectroscopy, Reactions, and Relaxation Processes
Surfaces, Interfaces, Single Molecules, Materials and Nanosciences
Polymers, Biopolymers, and Complex Systems
Other related topics