{"title":"工具箱中最锋利的工具:视觉法律修辞","authors":"Michael D. Murray","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3040952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Journal of Legal Education, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019) \n \nVisual briefs and other forms of visual rhetoric in legal communication may eventually become the norm in legal practice because of the enormous communicative and rhetorical power of visual media. Brain science demonstrates that visual devices work rapidly, almost immediately, to communicate ideas and attain the audience’s adherence to the meaning and truth of the ideas communicated, and thus to persuade the audience of the truth and propriety of the speaker’s communication. Visual representation is also associated with greater perception, comprehension, and retention of information. Visual imagery is not only faster than words, it is better than words. \n \nLaw students and lawyers should be aware that the tool of visual rhetoric is very sharp, and because of the audience’s pre-cognitive and cognitive brain functions in interpreting and understanding the message of visual works, which often process and draw meaning, reactions, and motivations from images without active “thinking,” the sharpness cuts in multiple directions. These attributes require special attention so as to avoid intentional or inadvertent misleading of the audience when using visual rhetorical devices. \n \nThis Article offers guidance with regard to: \n \n(A) the analysis of when to use or not use a visual rhetorical device; \n \n(B) the concept of mise en scene and the manipulation of visual devices; \n \n(C) the decision to use color or not to use color; and \n \n(D) the advisability of focus groups, and testing a visual device before a wider and more diverse test audience.","PeriodicalId":39591,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Education","volume":"68 1","pages":"64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric\",\"authors\":\"Michael D. Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3040952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Journal of Legal Education, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019) \\n \\nVisual briefs and other forms of visual rhetoric in legal communication may eventually become the norm in legal practice because of the enormous communicative and rhetorical power of visual media. Brain science demonstrates that visual devices work rapidly, almost immediately, to communicate ideas and attain the audience’s adherence to the meaning and truth of the ideas communicated, and thus to persuade the audience of the truth and propriety of the speaker’s communication. Visual representation is also associated with greater perception, comprehension, and retention of information. Visual imagery is not only faster than words, it is better than words. \\n \\nLaw students and lawyers should be aware that the tool of visual rhetoric is very sharp, and because of the audience’s pre-cognitive and cognitive brain functions in interpreting and understanding the message of visual works, which often process and draw meaning, reactions, and motivations from images without active “thinking,” the sharpness cuts in multiple directions. These attributes require special attention so as to avoid intentional or inadvertent misleading of the audience when using visual rhetorical devices. \\n \\nThis Article offers guidance with regard to: \\n \\n(A) the analysis of when to use or not use a visual rhetorical device; \\n \\n(B) the concept of mise en scene and the manipulation of visual devices; \\n \\n(C) the decision to use color or not to use color; and \\n \\n(D) the advisability of focus groups, and testing a visual device before a wider and more diverse test audience.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Legal Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3040952\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Education","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3040952","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Sharpest Tool in the Toolbox: Visual Legal Rhetoric
Journal of Legal Education, vol. 68, no. 1 (2019)
Visual briefs and other forms of visual rhetoric in legal communication may eventually become the norm in legal practice because of the enormous communicative and rhetorical power of visual media. Brain science demonstrates that visual devices work rapidly, almost immediately, to communicate ideas and attain the audience’s adherence to the meaning and truth of the ideas communicated, and thus to persuade the audience of the truth and propriety of the speaker’s communication. Visual representation is also associated with greater perception, comprehension, and retention of information. Visual imagery is not only faster than words, it is better than words.
Law students and lawyers should be aware that the tool of visual rhetoric is very sharp, and because of the audience’s pre-cognitive and cognitive brain functions in interpreting and understanding the message of visual works, which often process and draw meaning, reactions, and motivations from images without active “thinking,” the sharpness cuts in multiple directions. These attributes require special attention so as to avoid intentional or inadvertent misleading of the audience when using visual rhetorical devices.
This Article offers guidance with regard to:
(A) the analysis of when to use or not use a visual rhetorical device;
(B) the concept of mise en scene and the manipulation of visual devices;
(C) the decision to use color or not to use color; and
(D) the advisability of focus groups, and testing a visual device before a wider and more diverse test audience.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Legal Education (ISSN 0022-2208) is a quarterly publication of the Association of American Law Schools. The primary purpose of the Journal is to foster a rich interchange of ideas and information about legal education and related matters, including but not limited to the legal profession, legal theory, and legal scholarship. With a readership of more than 10,000 law teachers and about 500 subscribers, the Journal offers an unusually effective medium for communication to the law school world.