深圳市生物安全实验室2017年备案情况调查

H. Xian, Jian-fan He, Jianbin Xie, Xiao Li, X. Lv
{"title":"深圳市生物安全实验室2017年备案情况调查","authors":"H. Xian, Jian-fan He, Jianbin Xie, Xiao Li, X. Lv","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nAims to reduce the hidden risks of laboratory biosafety, understand the status of biosafety laboratory record filing situations in Shenzhen, and also to provide scientific basis for further standardizing the management of biosafety laboratory in Shenzhen. \n \n \nMethods \nIn 2017, 75 laboratories in Shenzhen completed record filing were surveyed, methodologies adopted including application materials review, phone call consultation and communication, carrying out corrective actions based on feedback peer review suggestions and finally complete the record filing. \n \n \nResults \nThe first/second level laboratory of biosafety in shenzhen is mainly public medical institutions, followed by private hospitals. In 2017, the first three record-filing LABS were Futian district, nanshan district and longgang district. According to the data analysis, lack of the second category of pathogenic microorganism laboratory activity project risk assessment report, and laboratory layout diagram function partition is not clear were two of the more prominent problems in the software and hardware of laboratory management respectively. \n \n \nConclusions \nBasically, the overall record filing of Shenzhen biosafety laboratory is good, however, more measurements should be developed to deal with identified problems to further strengthen the standardized management of laboratory biosafety. \n \n \nKey words: \nBiosafety laboratory; Biosafety; Record filing; Survey","PeriodicalId":59555,"journal":{"name":"中华医学科研管理杂志","volume":"32 1","pages":"226-228"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey of the record filing situations of Shenzhen biosafety laboratories in 2017\",\"authors\":\"H. Xian, Jian-fan He, Jianbin Xie, Xiao Li, X. Lv\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nAims to reduce the hidden risks of laboratory biosafety, understand the status of biosafety laboratory record filing situations in Shenzhen, and also to provide scientific basis for further standardizing the management of biosafety laboratory in Shenzhen. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nIn 2017, 75 laboratories in Shenzhen completed record filing were surveyed, methodologies adopted including application materials review, phone call consultation and communication, carrying out corrective actions based on feedback peer review suggestions and finally complete the record filing. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe first/second level laboratory of biosafety in shenzhen is mainly public medical institutions, followed by private hospitals. In 2017, the first three record-filing LABS were Futian district, nanshan district and longgang district. According to the data analysis, lack of the second category of pathogenic microorganism laboratory activity project risk assessment report, and laboratory layout diagram function partition is not clear were two of the more prominent problems in the software and hardware of laboratory management respectively. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nBasically, the overall record filing of Shenzhen biosafety laboratory is good, however, more measurements should be developed to deal with identified problems to further strengthen the standardized management of laboratory biosafety. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nBiosafety laboratory; Biosafety; Record filing; Survey\",\"PeriodicalId\":59555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"226-228\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华医学科研管理杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华医学科研管理杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1006-1924.2019.03.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的减少实验室生物安全隐患,了解深圳市生物安全实验室备案情况,为进一步规范深圳生物安全实验室管理提供科学依据。方法2017年,对深圳市75家完成备案的实验室进行调查,采用申请材料审查、电话咨询和沟通、根据反馈的同行评审建议采取纠正措施等方法,最终完成备案。结果深圳市生物安全一、二级实验室以公立医疗机构为主,民营医院次之。2017年,首批三个备案实验室分别为福田区、南山区和龙岗区。根据数据分析,缺乏第二类病原微生物实验室活动项目风险评估报告,以及实验室布局图功能划分不明确,分别是实验室软硬件管理中较为突出的两个问题。结论深圳生物安全实验室的总体备案情况基本良好,但应制定更多措施来处理已发现的问题,以进一步加强实验室生物安全的规范化管理。关键词:生物安全实验室;生物安全;备案;调查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survey of the record filing situations of Shenzhen biosafety laboratories in 2017
Objective Aims to reduce the hidden risks of laboratory biosafety, understand the status of biosafety laboratory record filing situations in Shenzhen, and also to provide scientific basis for further standardizing the management of biosafety laboratory in Shenzhen. Methods In 2017, 75 laboratories in Shenzhen completed record filing were surveyed, methodologies adopted including application materials review, phone call consultation and communication, carrying out corrective actions based on feedback peer review suggestions and finally complete the record filing. Results The first/second level laboratory of biosafety in shenzhen is mainly public medical institutions, followed by private hospitals. In 2017, the first three record-filing LABS were Futian district, nanshan district and longgang district. According to the data analysis, lack of the second category of pathogenic microorganism laboratory activity project risk assessment report, and laboratory layout diagram function partition is not clear were two of the more prominent problems in the software and hardware of laboratory management respectively. Conclusions Basically, the overall record filing of Shenzhen biosafety laboratory is good, however, more measurements should be developed to deal with identified problems to further strengthen the standardized management of laboratory biosafety. Key words: Biosafety laboratory; Biosafety; Record filing; Survey
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3322
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信