阿基米德是从哪里进来的，是怎么进来的？倾斜和迷宫般的反射

IF 1 4区综合性期刊 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/03080188.2022.2109102

J. Høyrup

{"title":"阿基米德是从哪里进来的，是怎么进来的？倾斜和迷宫般的反射","authors":"J. Høyrup","doi":"10.1080/03080188.2022.2109102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This answer to Reviel Netz’s article at first questions his optimism concerning our technological future. After that, it suggests a different role for Archimedes and the other prominent Greek mathematicians than the one claimed by Netz: as providers not of answers but of problems which called for the transformation of the abbacus and cossist algebra tradition, thereby allowing first Viète and then Descartes to create the first level of the new analysis of the seventeenth century (the second level being infinitesimal analysis).","PeriodicalId":50352,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","volume":"47 1","pages":"391 - 403"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where and how did Archimedes get in? Oblique and labyrinthine reflections\",\"authors\":\"J. Høyrup\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03080188.2022.2109102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This answer to Reviel Netz’s article at first questions his optimism concerning our technological future. After that, it suggests a different role for Archimedes and the other prominent Greek mathematicians than the one claimed by Netz: as providers not of answers but of problems which called for the transformation of the abbacus and cossist algebra tradition, thereby allowing first Viète and then Descartes to create the first level of the new analysis of the seventeenth century (the second level being infinitesimal analysis).\",\"PeriodicalId\":50352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"391 - 403\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2109102\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2109102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要：这篇对Reviel Netz文章的回答首先质疑了他对我们技术未来的乐观态度。在那之后，它表明阿基米德和其他著名的希腊数学家的角色与内兹所声称的不同：他们不是答案的提供者，而是问题的提供者，这些问题需要改变abbacus和cossist代数传统，从而允许首先是维特，然后是笛卡尔创造了17世纪新分析的第一个层次（第二个层次是无穷小分析）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Where and how did Archimedes get in? Oblique and labyrinthine reflections

ABSTRACT This answer to Reviel Netz’s article at first questions his optimism concerning our technological future. After that, it suggests a different role for Archimedes and the other prominent Greek mathematicians than the one claimed by Netz: as providers not of answers but of problems which called for the transformation of the abbacus and cossist algebra tradition, thereby allowing first Viète and then Descartes to create the first level of the new analysis of the seventeenth century (the second level being infinitesimal analysis).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 综合性期刊-综合性期刊

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

9.10%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Interdisciplinary Science Reviews is a quarterly journal that aims to explore the social, philosophical and historical interrelations of the natural sciences, engineering, mathematics, medicine and technology with the social sciences, humanities and arts.