初始降压药对脑出血后急性血压的影响

IF 2.6 1区 医学
Yisi Ng, Wenjing Qi, N. King, Thomas E. Christianson, V. Krishnamoorthy, Shreyansh Shah, A. Divani, Margaret Bettin, E. Coleman, M. Flaherty, Kyle B. Walsh, F. Testai, J. McCauley, Lee Gilkerson, C. Langefeld, Tyler P. Behymer, D. Woo, M. James
{"title":"初始降压药对脑出血后急性血压的影响","authors":"Yisi Ng, Wenjing Qi, N. King, Thomas E. Christianson, V. Krishnamoorthy, Shreyansh Shah, A. Divani, Margaret Bettin, E. Coleman, M. Flaherty, Kyle B. Walsh, F. Testai, J. McCauley, Lee Gilkerson, C. Langefeld, Tyler P. Behymer, D. Woo, M. James","doi":"10.1136/svn-2021-001101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Current guidelines recommend blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients after acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) without guidance on initial choice of antihypertensive class. This study sought to determine if initial antihypertensive class differentially effects acute BP lowering in a large multiethnic ICH cohort. Methods Subjects enrolled in the Ethnic/Racial Variations in ICH study between August 2010 and August 2017 with elevated admission BP and who received labetalol, nicardipine or hydralazine monotherapy as initial antihypertensive were analysed. Primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to first BP measurement after initial antihypertensive treatment. Secondary outcomes included haematoma expansion (HE), hospital length of stay (LOS) and modified Rankin Score (mRS) up to 12 months after ICH. Exploratory outcomes assessed effects of race/ethnicity. Linear and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for relevant covariates, were performed to determine associations of antihypertensive class with outcomes. Results In total, 1156 cases were used in analyses. Antihypertensive class was associated with diastolic BP change (p=0.003), but not systolic BP change (p=0.419). Initial dosing with nicardipine lowered acute diastolic BP than labetalol (least square mean difference (labetalol-nicardipine)=5.47 (2.37, 8.57), p<0.001). Initial antihypertensive class was also found to be associated with LOS (p=0.028), but not with HE (p=0.406), mortality (p=0.118), discharge disposition (p=0.083) or mRS score at discharge, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (p=0.262, 0.276, 0.152 and 0.36, respectively). Race/ethnicity variably affected multivariable models. Conclusion In this large acute ICH cohort, initial antihypertensive class was associated with acute diastolic, but not systolic, BP-lowering suggesting differential effects of antihypertensive agents. Trial registration number NCT01202864.","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial antihypertensive agent effects on acute blood pressure after intracerebral haemorrhage\",\"authors\":\"Yisi Ng, Wenjing Qi, N. King, Thomas E. Christianson, V. Krishnamoorthy, Shreyansh Shah, A. Divani, Margaret Bettin, E. Coleman, M. Flaherty, Kyle B. Walsh, F. Testai, J. McCauley, Lee Gilkerson, C. Langefeld, Tyler P. Behymer, D. Woo, M. James\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/svn-2021-001101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Current guidelines recommend blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients after acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) without guidance on initial choice of antihypertensive class. This study sought to determine if initial antihypertensive class differentially effects acute BP lowering in a large multiethnic ICH cohort. Methods Subjects enrolled in the Ethnic/Racial Variations in ICH study between August 2010 and August 2017 with elevated admission BP and who received labetalol, nicardipine or hydralazine monotherapy as initial antihypertensive were analysed. Primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to first BP measurement after initial antihypertensive treatment. Secondary outcomes included haematoma expansion (HE), hospital length of stay (LOS) and modified Rankin Score (mRS) up to 12 months after ICH. Exploratory outcomes assessed effects of race/ethnicity. Linear and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for relevant covariates, were performed to determine associations of antihypertensive class with outcomes. Results In total, 1156 cases were used in analyses. Antihypertensive class was associated with diastolic BP change (p=0.003), but not systolic BP change (p=0.419). Initial dosing with nicardipine lowered acute diastolic BP than labetalol (least square mean difference (labetalol-nicardipine)=5.47 (2.37, 8.57), p<0.001). Initial antihypertensive class was also found to be associated with LOS (p=0.028), but not with HE (p=0.406), mortality (p=0.118), discharge disposition (p=0.083) or mRS score at discharge, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (p=0.262, 0.276, 0.152 and 0.36, respectively). Race/ethnicity variably affected multivariable models. Conclusion In this large acute ICH cohort, initial antihypertensive class was associated with acute diastolic, but not systolic, BP-lowering suggesting differential effects of antihypertensive agents. Trial registration number NCT01202864.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Investigative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2021-001101\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2021-001101","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言目前的指南建议急性脑出血(ICH)后患者降低血压(BP),但没有指导降压级别的初步选择。本研究旨在确定在一个大型多民族ICH队列中,初始降压类别是否对急性血压降低有不同影响。方法对2010年8月至2017年8月期间因入院血压升高而参加ICH民族/种族差异研究的受试者进行分析,并对接受拉贝洛尔、尼卡地平或肼嗪单药治疗作为初始降压药的受试对象进行分析。主要结果是从基线到首次降压治疗后血压测量的收缩压和舒张压变化。次要结果包括脑出血后12个月的血肿扩大(HE)、住院时间(LOS)和改良兰金评分(mRS)。探索性结果评估了种族/民族的影响。进行线性和逻辑回归分析,对相关协变量进行调整,以确定降压级别与结果的相关性。结果共有1156例病例用于分析。降压级别与舒张压变化相关(p=0.003),但与收缩压变化无关(p=0.419)。首次给药尼卡地平比拉贝洛尔降低急性舒张压(最小均方差(拉贝洛尔尼卡地平)=5.47(2.37,8.57),p<0.001)。首次降压级别也与LOS(p=0.028)相关,但与HE(p=0.406)、死亡率(p=0.118)、,出院处置(p=0.083)或出院时、3个月、6个月和12个月随访时的mRS评分(分别为p=0.262、0.276、0.152和0.36)。种族/民族对多变量模型的影响各不相同。结论在这个大型急性脑出血队列中,最初的降压级别与急性舒张相关,但与收缩无关,血压降低表明降压药物的不同作用。试验注册号NCT01202864。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial antihypertensive agent effects on acute blood pressure after intracerebral haemorrhage
Introduction Current guidelines recommend blood pressure (BP) lowering in patients after acute intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) without guidance on initial choice of antihypertensive class. This study sought to determine if initial antihypertensive class differentially effects acute BP lowering in a large multiethnic ICH cohort. Methods Subjects enrolled in the Ethnic/Racial Variations in ICH study between August 2010 and August 2017 with elevated admission BP and who received labetalol, nicardipine or hydralazine monotherapy as initial antihypertensive were analysed. Primary outcomes were systolic and diastolic BP changes from baseline to first BP measurement after initial antihypertensive treatment. Secondary outcomes included haematoma expansion (HE), hospital length of stay (LOS) and modified Rankin Score (mRS) up to 12 months after ICH. Exploratory outcomes assessed effects of race/ethnicity. Linear and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for relevant covariates, were performed to determine associations of antihypertensive class with outcomes. Results In total, 1156 cases were used in analyses. Antihypertensive class was associated with diastolic BP change (p=0.003), but not systolic BP change (p=0.419). Initial dosing with nicardipine lowered acute diastolic BP than labetalol (least square mean difference (labetalol-nicardipine)=5.47 (2.37, 8.57), p<0.001). Initial antihypertensive class was also found to be associated with LOS (p=0.028), but not with HE (p=0.406), mortality (p=0.118), discharge disposition (p=0.083) or mRS score at discharge, 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up (p=0.262, 0.276, 0.152 and 0.36, respectively). Race/ethnicity variably affected multivariable models. Conclusion In this large acute ICH cohort, initial antihypertensive class was associated with acute diastolic, but not systolic, BP-lowering suggesting differential effects of antihypertensive agents. Trial registration number NCT01202864.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALMEDICINE, RESE-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信