基于指数的长期套期保值中的基差风险:长期套期保值指南

IF 1.4 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
A. Cairns, Ghali El Boukfaoui
{"title":"基于指数的长期套期保值中的基差风险:长期套期保值指南","authors":"A. Cairns, Ghali El Boukfaoui","doi":"10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers the assessment of longevity basis risk in the context of a general index-based hedge. We develop a detailed framework for measuring the impact of a hedge on regulatory or economic capital that takes population basis risk explicitly into account. The framework is set up in a way that accommodates a variety of regulatory regimes such as Solvency II as well as local actuarial practice, attempting, therefore, to bridge the gap between academia and practice. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the capital relief resulting from a hedge that uses a call spread as the hedging instrument. We find that the impact of population basis risk on capital relief (expressed in terms of a “haircut” relative to the case with no population basis risk) depends strongly on the exhaustion point of the hedge instrument. In particular, in a Solvency II setting, if the exhaustion point lies well below the 99.5% Value-at-Risk, population basis risk has a negligible impact and the haircut is zero.","PeriodicalId":46812,"journal":{"name":"North American Actuarial Journal","volume":"25 1","pages":"S97 - S118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Basis Risk in Index-Based Longevity Hedges: A Guide for Longevity Hedgers\",\"authors\":\"A. Cairns, Ghali El Boukfaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers the assessment of longevity basis risk in the context of a general index-based hedge. We develop a detailed framework for measuring the impact of a hedge on regulatory or economic capital that takes population basis risk explicitly into account. The framework is set up in a way that accommodates a variety of regulatory regimes such as Solvency II as well as local actuarial practice, attempting, therefore, to bridge the gap between academia and practice. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the capital relief resulting from a hedge that uses a call spread as the hedging instrument. We find that the impact of population basis risk on capital relief (expressed in terms of a “haircut” relative to the case with no population basis risk) depends strongly on the exhaustion point of the hedge instrument. In particular, in a Solvency II setting, if the exhaustion point lies well below the 99.5% Value-at-Risk, population basis risk has a negligible impact and the haircut is zero.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"North American Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"S97 - S118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"North American Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2019.1651658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本文考虑了在一般基于指数的套期保值背景下的长寿基础风险评估。我们开发了一个详细的框架来衡量对冲对监管资本或经济资本的影响,该框架明确考虑了基于人口的风险。该框架以适应各种监管制度(如Solvency II)以及当地精算实践的方式建立,因此试图弥合学术界与实践之间的差距。接下来是对使用看涨价差作为对冲工具的对冲所产生的资本减免的详细分析。我们发现,人口基础风险对资本减免的影响(以相对于没有人口基础风险的情况的“削发”表示)强烈依赖于对冲工具的耗尽点。特别是,在偿付能力II设置中,如果耗尽点远低于99.5%的风险价值,则人口基础风险的影响可以忽略不计,并且理发为零。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Basis Risk in Index-Based Longevity Hedges: A Guide for Longevity Hedgers
This article considers the assessment of longevity basis risk in the context of a general index-based hedge. We develop a detailed framework for measuring the impact of a hedge on regulatory or economic capital that takes population basis risk explicitly into account. The framework is set up in a way that accommodates a variety of regulatory regimes such as Solvency II as well as local actuarial practice, attempting, therefore, to bridge the gap between academia and practice. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the capital relief resulting from a hedge that uses a call spread as the hedging instrument. We find that the impact of population basis risk on capital relief (expressed in terms of a “haircut” relative to the case with no population basis risk) depends strongly on the exhaustion point of the hedge instrument. In particular, in a Solvency II setting, if the exhaustion point lies well below the 99.5% Value-at-Risk, population basis risk has a negligible impact and the haircut is zero.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信