犹太艺术与现代性

IF 0.1 0 ART
Larry Silver
{"title":"犹太艺术与现代性","authors":"Larry Silver","doi":"10.3828/aj.2017.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Quoted by Matthew Baigell, Jewish Art in America (Lanham, MD, 2007), 96. 2 On Jews and modern New York, see Harry Rand, “The Art of New York’s Jews: A Delicate Lesson,” in Transformation: Jews and Modernity [catalogue, Arthur Ross Gallery], ed. Larry Silver (Philadelphia, 2001), 69–75. 3 The phrase echoes the title of Margaret Olin’s The Nation without Art: Examining Modern Discourses on Jewish Art (Lincoln, NE, 2001), esp. 5–31; Kalman Bland, The Artless Jew: Medieval and Modern Affirmations and Denials of the Visual (Princeton, 2000). At the opposite pole, taking up the challenge of confrontational Jewish themes in modern art of various kinds, see Norman Kleeblatt, ed., Too Jewish? Challenging Both of the terms in the title of this essay have been endlessly debated in an effort to arrive at some kind of essentialistic definition of each. I suggest that such definitions are contextual and interdependent. The attempt to be a modern artist is vexing enough in general, but for Jews, who for centuries have been regarded by others as well as by many of their fellow Jews as the “people without art” because of the Second Commandment’s injunction against making graven images, making art poses particular challenges.3 As a result, perhaps unsurprisingly, their personal artistic achievements have varied considerably. Is there any way, then, to discern something “Jewish” in the work of late nineteenthor twentieth-century Jewish artists? This essay attempts to provide an analysis of Jewish art-making in context, theoretical as well as pragmatic.4","PeriodicalId":41476,"journal":{"name":"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art","volume":"13 1","pages":"49 - 64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jewish Art and Modernity\",\"authors\":\"Larry Silver\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/aj.2017.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 Quoted by Matthew Baigell, Jewish Art in America (Lanham, MD, 2007), 96. 2 On Jews and modern New York, see Harry Rand, “The Art of New York’s Jews: A Delicate Lesson,” in Transformation: Jews and Modernity [catalogue, Arthur Ross Gallery], ed. Larry Silver (Philadelphia, 2001), 69–75. 3 The phrase echoes the title of Margaret Olin’s The Nation without Art: Examining Modern Discourses on Jewish Art (Lincoln, NE, 2001), esp. 5–31; Kalman Bland, The Artless Jew: Medieval and Modern Affirmations and Denials of the Visual (Princeton, 2000). At the opposite pole, taking up the challenge of confrontational Jewish themes in modern art of various kinds, see Norman Kleeblatt, ed., Too Jewish? Challenging Both of the terms in the title of this essay have been endlessly debated in an effort to arrive at some kind of essentialistic definition of each. I suggest that such definitions are contextual and interdependent. The attempt to be a modern artist is vexing enough in general, but for Jews, who for centuries have been regarded by others as well as by many of their fellow Jews as the “people without art” because of the Second Commandment’s injunction against making graven images, making art poses particular challenges.3 As a result, perhaps unsurprisingly, their personal artistic achievements have varied considerably. Is there any way, then, to discern something “Jewish” in the work of late nineteenthor twentieth-century Jewish artists? This essay attempts to provide an analysis of Jewish art-making in context, theoretical as well as pragmatic.4\",\"PeriodicalId\":41476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"49 - 64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/aj.2017.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/aj.2017.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1引用Matthew Baigell,《美国的犹太艺术》(Lanham,MD,2007),96。2关于犹太人和现代纽约,见Harry Rand,“纽约犹太人的艺术:一堂精致的课”,《转变:犹太人与现代性》[目录,Arthur Ross画廊],编辑Larry Silver(费城,2001),69-75。3这句话呼应了玛格丽特·奥林的《没有艺术的国家:审视犹太艺术的现代话语》(Lincoln,NE,2001)的标题,特别是5–31;Kalman Bland,《无艺术的犹太人:中世纪和现代对视觉的肯定和否定》(普林斯顿,2000年)。相反,在各种现代艺术中,面对对抗性犹太主题的挑战,参见Norman Kleeblatt主编的《太犹太了?挑战这篇文章标题中的这两个术语一直在争论不休,试图对每一个术语都做出某种本质主义的定义。我认为,这些定义是有上下文的,是相互依存的。总的来说,成为一名现代艺术家的尝试已经够令人烦恼的了,但对于犹太人来说,制作艺术带来了特别的挑战。几个世纪以来,由于第二条戒律禁止制作雕刻的图像,他们一直被其他人和许多犹太同胞视为“没有艺术的人”,他们个人的艺术成就差异很大。那么,有没有办法从19世纪末20世纪的犹太艺术家的作品中辨别出一些“犹太人”的东西呢?本文试图从语境、理论和语用三个方面对犹太艺术创作进行分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jewish Art and Modernity
1 Quoted by Matthew Baigell, Jewish Art in America (Lanham, MD, 2007), 96. 2 On Jews and modern New York, see Harry Rand, “The Art of New York’s Jews: A Delicate Lesson,” in Transformation: Jews and Modernity [catalogue, Arthur Ross Gallery], ed. Larry Silver (Philadelphia, 2001), 69–75. 3 The phrase echoes the title of Margaret Olin’s The Nation without Art: Examining Modern Discourses on Jewish Art (Lincoln, NE, 2001), esp. 5–31; Kalman Bland, The Artless Jew: Medieval and Modern Affirmations and Denials of the Visual (Princeton, 2000). At the opposite pole, taking up the challenge of confrontational Jewish themes in modern art of various kinds, see Norman Kleeblatt, ed., Too Jewish? Challenging Both of the terms in the title of this essay have been endlessly debated in an effort to arrive at some kind of essentialistic definition of each. I suggest that such definitions are contextual and interdependent. The attempt to be a modern artist is vexing enough in general, but for Jews, who for centuries have been regarded by others as well as by many of their fellow Jews as the “people without art” because of the Second Commandment’s injunction against making graven images, making art poses particular challenges.3 As a result, perhaps unsurprisingly, their personal artistic achievements have varied considerably. Is there any way, then, to discern something “Jewish” in the work of late nineteenthor twentieth-century Jewish artists? This essay attempts to provide an analysis of Jewish art-making in context, theoretical as well as pragmatic.4
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信