{"title":"直肠周围脓肿导管引流的文献综述:传统外科引流的潜在替代方案","authors":"V. Kovalev, Benjamin S. Hopkins","doi":"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_25_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perirectal abscesses most commonly occur as a result of bacteria entering the anal crypt and invading the anal duct and gland. Multiple complications can occur with perirectal abscesses; the most common complication is the formation of a perirectal fistula. The primary goal of this study is to explore the use of computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses in comparison to traditional incision and drainage. We conducted a PubMed search for “rectal abscess” and “perianal abscess,” which yielded a total of 908 articles. We included articles in English with no time restrictions. All articles were reviewed for their relevance. The relevant articles were cross-referenced for additional articles. The traditional treatment for perirectal abscesses is adequate surgical drainage with antibiotics as an adjunct. The use of catheter-based percutaneous drainage as an alternative lacks evidence in the current available literature. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage has been the standard of care for small, radiologically accessible diverticular abscesses. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage should be considered for the adequate treatment of uncomplicated pelvic and intraabdominal abscesses.","PeriodicalId":90396,"journal":{"name":"World journal of colorectal surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A brief literature review of catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses: A potential alternative to traditional surgical drainage\",\"authors\":\"V. Kovalev, Benjamin S. Hopkins\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_25_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perirectal abscesses most commonly occur as a result of bacteria entering the anal crypt and invading the anal duct and gland. Multiple complications can occur with perirectal abscesses; the most common complication is the formation of a perirectal fistula. The primary goal of this study is to explore the use of computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses in comparison to traditional incision and drainage. We conducted a PubMed search for “rectal abscess” and “perianal abscess,” which yielded a total of 908 articles. We included articles in English with no time restrictions. All articles were reviewed for their relevance. The relevant articles were cross-referenced for additional articles. The traditional treatment for perirectal abscesses is adequate surgical drainage with antibiotics as an adjunct. The use of catheter-based percutaneous drainage as an alternative lacks evidence in the current available literature. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage has been the standard of care for small, radiologically accessible diverticular abscesses. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage should be considered for the adequate treatment of uncomplicated pelvic and intraabdominal abscesses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of colorectal surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_25_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of colorectal surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/wjcs.wjcs_25_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A brief literature review of catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses: A potential alternative to traditional surgical drainage
Perirectal abscesses most commonly occur as a result of bacteria entering the anal crypt and invading the anal duct and gland. Multiple complications can occur with perirectal abscesses; the most common complication is the formation of a perirectal fistula. The primary goal of this study is to explore the use of computed tomography- or ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter-based drainage of perirectal abscesses in comparison to traditional incision and drainage. We conducted a PubMed search for “rectal abscess” and “perianal abscess,” which yielded a total of 908 articles. We included articles in English with no time restrictions. All articles were reviewed for their relevance. The relevant articles were cross-referenced for additional articles. The traditional treatment for perirectal abscesses is adequate surgical drainage with antibiotics as an adjunct. The use of catheter-based percutaneous drainage as an alternative lacks evidence in the current available literature. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage has been the standard of care for small, radiologically accessible diverticular abscesses. Ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous drainage should be considered for the adequate treatment of uncomplicated pelvic and intraabdominal abscesses.