实施基于问题的学习是否合适?关于会计学习的文献综述

Wilda Auwalina Istigfarin, Endang Sri Andayani
{"title":"实施基于问题的学习是否合适?关于会计学习的文献综述","authors":"Wilda Auwalina Istigfarin, Endang Sri Andayani","doi":"10.15294/dp.v18i1.42143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study is to examine the development of research results on the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in accounting learning in Indonesia within a 10-year period (2012 – 2022). The research was conducted using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. A review was carried out on 54 PBL articles in the field of accounting education in Sinta 1-6 accredited journals. Research results showed the following findings, there were 54 published articles on PBL in the accounting field from 2012 to 2022, and most articles were published in 2017-2018. The most popular variants on the PBL research method in the accounting field employed Classroom Action Research (41%), followed by experimental research (33%). Most of the research objects involved vocational high schools, universities, and senior high schools. Of the 54 articles that were examined, only 18 articles presented the learning syntax in accordance with the PBL terms from Howard Barrows. Another 12 articles did not follow the PBL terms, but did present problems in learning. However, the utilized problems were not in accordance with the characteristics of problems in PBL, which involve real, unexpected, and unplanned (unstructured) problems. This is presumably because the researchers (1) do not fully understand the features of PBL, or (2) have problems formulating problems in the accounting field that are in accordance with the demands of PBL.","PeriodicalId":30810,"journal":{"name":"Dinamika Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Appropriate? A Literature Review on Accounting Learning\",\"authors\":\"Wilda Auwalina Istigfarin, Endang Sri Andayani\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/dp.v18i1.42143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this study is to examine the development of research results on the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in accounting learning in Indonesia within a 10-year period (2012 – 2022). The research was conducted using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. A review was carried out on 54 PBL articles in the field of accounting education in Sinta 1-6 accredited journals. Research results showed the following findings, there were 54 published articles on PBL in the accounting field from 2012 to 2022, and most articles were published in 2017-2018. The most popular variants on the PBL research method in the accounting field employed Classroom Action Research (41%), followed by experimental research (33%). Most of the research objects involved vocational high schools, universities, and senior high schools. Of the 54 articles that were examined, only 18 articles presented the learning syntax in accordance with the PBL terms from Howard Barrows. Another 12 articles did not follow the PBL terms, but did present problems in learning. However, the utilized problems were not in accordance with the characteristics of problems in PBL, which involve real, unexpected, and unplanned (unstructured) problems. This is presumably because the researchers (1) do not fully understand the features of PBL, or (2) have problems formulating problems in the accounting field that are in accordance with the demands of PBL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dinamika Pendidikan\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dinamika Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v18i1.42143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dinamika Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/dp.v18i1.42143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是研究在印尼会计学习中实施基于问题的学习(PBL)的研究成果的发展,为期10年(2012 - 2022)。本研究采用系统文献综述法(SLR)进行。对Sinta 1-6认可期刊中会计教育领域的54篇PBL文章进行了综述。研究结果显示:2012 - 2022年,会计领域发表了54篇关于PBL的文章,其中大部分发表在2017-2018年。在会计领域,PBL研究方法最受欢迎的变体是课堂行动研究(41%),其次是实验研究(33%)。研究对象多为职业高中、大学和高中。在被检查的54篇文章中,只有18篇文章呈现了与Howard Barrows的PBL术语一致的学习语法。另外12篇文章没有遵循PBL的术语,但在学习方面确实存在问题。然而,所使用的问题并不符合PBL问题的特点,即涉及真实问题、意外问题和计划外(非结构化)问题。这可能是因为研究者们(1)没有完全理解PBL的特点,或者(2)在会计领域制定符合PBL要求的问题时存在问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is the Implementation of Problem-Based Learning Appropriate? A Literature Review on Accounting Learning
The objective of this study is to examine the development of research results on the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in accounting learning in Indonesia within a 10-year period (2012 – 2022). The research was conducted using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. A review was carried out on 54 PBL articles in the field of accounting education in Sinta 1-6 accredited journals. Research results showed the following findings, there were 54 published articles on PBL in the accounting field from 2012 to 2022, and most articles were published in 2017-2018. The most popular variants on the PBL research method in the accounting field employed Classroom Action Research (41%), followed by experimental research (33%). Most of the research objects involved vocational high schools, universities, and senior high schools. Of the 54 articles that were examined, only 18 articles presented the learning syntax in accordance with the PBL terms from Howard Barrows. Another 12 articles did not follow the PBL terms, but did present problems in learning. However, the utilized problems were not in accordance with the characteristics of problems in PBL, which involve real, unexpected, and unplanned (unstructured) problems. This is presumably because the researchers (1) do not fully understand the features of PBL, or (2) have problems formulating problems in the accounting field that are in accordance with the demands of PBL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信