{"title":"作为部分结构修饰语的强调反射词","authors":"J. Tellings","doi":"10.1075/avt.00031.tel","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The standard analysis of emphatic reflexives assumes that they\n are focused expressions of identity in all their uses (e.g. Gast 2006). On the basis of semantic\n and prosodic data, I argue that exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives in Dutch\n and English should instead be analyzed as expressions excluding certain\n participants from the modified event (“P-exclusives”). The proposed analysis is\n based on Moltmann’s (2004) account of\n the part-structure modifier ‘alone’, and avoids a number of problems that the\n standard analysis has when applied to these data.","PeriodicalId":35138,"journal":{"name":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emphatic reflexives as part-structure modifiers\",\"authors\":\"J. Tellings\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/avt.00031.tel\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The standard analysis of emphatic reflexives assumes that they\\n are focused expressions of identity in all their uses (e.g. Gast 2006). On the basis of semantic\\n and prosodic data, I argue that exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives in Dutch\\n and English should instead be analyzed as expressions excluding certain\\n participants from the modified event (“P-exclusives”). The proposed analysis is\\n based on Moltmann’s (2004) account of\\n the part-structure modifier ‘alone’, and avoids a number of problems that the\\n standard analysis has when applied to these data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistics in the Netherlands\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00031.tel\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistics in the Netherlands","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00031.tel","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The standard analysis of emphatic reflexives assumes that they
are focused expressions of identity in all their uses (e.g. Gast 2006). On the basis of semantic
and prosodic data, I argue that exclusive adverbial emphatic reflexives in Dutch
and English should instead be analyzed as expressions excluding certain
participants from the modified event (“P-exclusives”). The proposed analysis is
based on Moltmann’s (2004) account of
the part-structure modifier ‘alone’, and avoids a number of problems that the
standard analysis has when applied to these data.
期刊介绍:
Linguistics in the Netherlands is a series of annual publications, sponsored by the Dutch Linguistics Association (Algemene Vereniging voor Taalwetenschap) and published by John Benjamins Publishing Company since Volume 8 in 1991. Each volume contains a careful selection through peer review of papers presented at the annual meeting of the society. The aim of the annual meeting is to provide members with an opportunity to report on their work in progress. Each volume presents an overview of research in different fields of linguistics in the Netherlands containing articles on phonetics, phonology, morphology, syntax and semantics.