哪些团体活动对痴呆症患者最有效?娱乐治疗人员和研究观察者的评分比较

J. Cohen-Mansfield, Linda Truong, Ba Ctrs Rachel Gavendo, Ba Ctrs Erin Blackburn, Ma Ctrs Karen Hirshfeld
{"title":"哪些团体活动对痴呆症患者最有效?娱乐治疗人员和研究观察者的评分比较","authors":"J. Cohen-Mansfield, Linda Truong, Ba Ctrs Rachel Gavendo, Ba Ctrs Erin Blackburn, Ma Ctrs Karen Hirshfeld","doi":"10.5055/AJRT.2019.0188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact of therapeutic recreation activities for Persons with Dementia (PwD) on the groups’ participants and on the staff running the groups in order to enhance the understanding of factors which impact the outcomes of therapeutic recreation. Ten therapeutic recreation staff (TRS) members led two series of 10 different group activities for 104 PwD. Afterward, they reported the activities they deemed most versus least successful for participants and for themselves. These evaluations were compared with observations of outcomes (attendance, engagement, affect) as rated by both TRS and research observers immediately after the activities. Choral-singing and brain games were most frequently reported as most successful for participants; holiday newsletter and creative storytelling were most often mentioned as least successful. Activities reported to be more successful for participants were also likely to be considered more successful for TRS. This work provides insight for future investigation on the variables affecting the impact of group activities on both the target audience and on the staff running them.","PeriodicalId":90432,"journal":{"name":"American journal of recreation therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which group activities work best for persons with dementia? A comparison of ratings from therapeutic recreation staff and research observers\",\"authors\":\"J. Cohen-Mansfield, Linda Truong, Ba Ctrs Rachel Gavendo, Ba Ctrs Erin Blackburn, Ma Ctrs Karen Hirshfeld\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/AJRT.2019.0188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This pilot study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact of therapeutic recreation activities for Persons with Dementia (PwD) on the groups’ participants and on the staff running the groups in order to enhance the understanding of factors which impact the outcomes of therapeutic recreation. Ten therapeutic recreation staff (TRS) members led two series of 10 different group activities for 104 PwD. Afterward, they reported the activities they deemed most versus least successful for participants and for themselves. These evaluations were compared with observations of outcomes (attendance, engagement, affect) as rated by both TRS and research observers immediately after the activities. Choral-singing and brain games were most frequently reported as most successful for participants; holiday newsletter and creative storytelling were most often mentioned as least successful. Activities reported to be more successful for participants were also likely to be considered more successful for TRS. This work provides insight for future investigation on the variables affecting the impact of group activities on both the target audience and on the staff running them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of recreation therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of recreation therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/AJRT.2019.0188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of recreation therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/AJRT.2019.0188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本初步研究旨在评估痴呆症患者治疗性娱乐活动对小组参与者和小组工作人员的感知影响,以加深对影响治疗性娱乐结果的因素的了解。10名康体治疗人员为104名残疾人士主持了两个系列的10个不同的小组活动。之后,他们报告了他们认为对参与者和他们自己最成功和最不成功的活动。这些评估与TRS和研究观察员在活动结束后立即对结果(出勤率、参与度、影响)的观察结果进行比较。据报道,合唱和脑力游戏对参与者来说是最成功的;假日时事通讯和创意故事通常被认为是最不成功的。据报道,对参与者来说更成功的活动也可能被认为对TRS来说更成功。这项工作为未来调查影响群体活动对目标受众和工作人员影响的变量提供了洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which group activities work best for persons with dementia? A comparison of ratings from therapeutic recreation staff and research observers
This pilot study aimed to evaluate the perceived impact of therapeutic recreation activities for Persons with Dementia (PwD) on the groups’ participants and on the staff running the groups in order to enhance the understanding of factors which impact the outcomes of therapeutic recreation. Ten therapeutic recreation staff (TRS) members led two series of 10 different group activities for 104 PwD. Afterward, they reported the activities they deemed most versus least successful for participants and for themselves. These evaluations were compared with observations of outcomes (attendance, engagement, affect) as rated by both TRS and research observers immediately after the activities. Choral-singing and brain games were most frequently reported as most successful for participants; holiday newsletter and creative storytelling were most often mentioned as least successful. Activities reported to be more successful for participants were also likely to be considered more successful for TRS. This work provides insight for future investigation on the variables affecting the impact of group activities on both the target audience and on the staff running them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信