Konstantin Pikula , Alexander Zakharenko , Vladimir Chaika , Konstantin Kirichenko , Aristidis Tsatsakis , Kirill Golokhvast
{"title":"纳米毒理学的风险评估:生物信息学和计算方法","authors":"Konstantin Pikula , Alexander Zakharenko , Vladimir Chaika , Konstantin Kirichenko , Aristidis Tsatsakis , Kirill Golokhvast","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of </span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em><span> testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37736,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessments in nanotoxicology: bioinformatics and computational approaches\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Pikula , Alexander Zakharenko , Vladimir Chaika , Konstantin Kirichenko , Aristidis Tsatsakis , Kirill Golokhvast\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of </span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em><span> testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202019300646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202019300646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk assessments in nanotoxicology: bioinformatics and computational approaches
A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of in vivo and in vitro testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.
期刊介绍:
The aims and scope of Current Opinion in Toxicology is to systematically provide the reader with timely and provocative views and opinions of the highest qualified and recognized experts on current advances in selected topics within the field of toxicology. The goal is that Current Opinion in Toxicology will be an invaluable source of information and perspective for researchers, teachers, managers and administrators, policy makers and students. Division of the subject into sections: For this purpose, the scope of Toxicology is divided into six selected high impact themed sections, each of which is reviewed once a year: Mechanistic Toxicology, Metabolic Toxicology, Risk assessment in Toxicology, Genomic Toxicology, Systems Toxicology, Translational Toxicology.