纳米毒理学的风险评估:生物信息学和计算方法

IF 4.6
Konstantin Pikula , Alexander Zakharenko , Vladimir Chaika , Konstantin Kirichenko , Aristidis Tsatsakis , Kirill Golokhvast
{"title":"纳米毒理学的风险评估:生物信息学和计算方法","authors":"Konstantin Pikula ,&nbsp;Alexander Zakharenko ,&nbsp;Vladimir Chaika ,&nbsp;Konstantin Kirichenko ,&nbsp;Aristidis Tsatsakis ,&nbsp;Kirill Golokhvast","doi":"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of </span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em><span> testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":93968,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk assessments in nanotoxicology: bioinformatics and computational approaches\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Pikula ,&nbsp;Alexander Zakharenko ,&nbsp;Vladimir Chaika ,&nbsp;Konstantin Kirichenko ,&nbsp;Aristidis Tsatsakis ,&nbsp;Kirill Golokhvast\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of </span><em>in vivo</em> and <em>in vitro</em><span> testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.cotox.2019.08.006\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202019300646\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468202019300646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

工程纳米颗粒(ENPs)的大规模生产成为最重要的环境问题之一。ENPs(生态)毒性作用的机制尚不完全清楚,并且对这些机制的估计是一项复杂的任务,因为即使颗粒特性的微小变化也可能极大地改变其毒性。由于不断制造具有特定功能和不同物理化学性质的ENPs,传统的体内和体外测试方法将无法填补纳米毒理学的现有知识空白。本综述的目的是忽略基于ENPs风险评估新方法(如生物信息学方法和机器学习工具)的当前成就。这些方法证实了它们能够可靠地预测和评估ENPs的行为及其毒性终点。基于这些方法和途径的数据库和项目对于解决环境保护单位的监管问题将非常有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk assessments in nanotoxicology: bioinformatics and computational approaches

A massive-scale production of engineered nanoparticles (ENPs) becomes one of the most important environmental issues. The mechanisms of ENPs' (eco)toxic action are not fully understood, and the estimation of those mechanisms is a complicated task because even slight changes in particle characteristics could dramatically change their toxicity. As a result of continuous manufacturing of ENPs with specific functionality and different physicochemical properties, conventional methods of in vivo and in vitro testing would not be able to fill the existing knowledge gap in nanotoxicology. The objectives of this review are to overlook the current achievements based on the new approaches of ENPs' risk assessment, such as bioinformatics approaches and machine learning tools. These methods confirmed their ability to reliable prediction and evaluation of ENPs' behavior and their toxic endpoints. Databases and projects based on these methods and approaches would be highly useful in addressing the problem of ENPs’ regulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current opinion in toxicology
Current opinion in toxicology Toxicology, Biochemistry
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
64 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信