一种基于帧的源-目标不对称方法

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
T. Georgakopoulos
{"title":"一种基于帧的源-目标不对称方法","authors":"T. Georgakopoulos","doi":"10.1075/CF.00011.GEO","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper investigates the asymmetrical behavior of Sources and Goals of motion in Homeric and Classical Greek within the frame\n semantics paradigm. In particular, based on a corpus of 26 works covering four text types, it is shown that (a) regardless of\n their semantic class, motion verbs display preference for Goal paths compared to Source ones; (b) the frame that a verb\n belongs to affects the type of path chosen only to a certain degree that does not change the Source-Goal imbalance; (c)\n semantically incongruent motion verb – path combinations are naturally less frequent than congruent combinations, but\n within the category of incongruent combinations the tokens are distributed in a way that reflects the prevalence of Goals; (d) the\n number of markers for the encoding of Goal is higher than that of Source; and (e) Source and Goal markers interact with Place ones\n in an asymmetrical way: Goal markers come to encode Place and, similarly, Place markers come to express Goal. Conversely, the\n interaction of markers exhibiting Source-Place polysemy is unidirectional, in the sense that none of these markers was originally\n used to encode Place alone. Theoretical implications of the study are discussed and directions for future research are\n suggested.","PeriodicalId":42321,"journal":{"name":"Constructions and Frames","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry\",\"authors\":\"T. Georgakopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/CF.00011.GEO\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper investigates the asymmetrical behavior of Sources and Goals of motion in Homeric and Classical Greek within the frame\\n semantics paradigm. In particular, based on a corpus of 26 works covering four text types, it is shown that (a) regardless of\\n their semantic class, motion verbs display preference for Goal paths compared to Source ones; (b) the frame that a verb\\n belongs to affects the type of path chosen only to a certain degree that does not change the Source-Goal imbalance; (c)\\n semantically incongruent motion verb – path combinations are naturally less frequent than congruent combinations, but\\n within the category of incongruent combinations the tokens are distributed in a way that reflects the prevalence of Goals; (d) the\\n number of markers for the encoding of Goal is higher than that of Source; and (e) Source and Goal markers interact with Place ones\\n in an asymmetrical way: Goal markers come to encode Place and, similarly, Place markers come to express Goal. Conversely, the\\n interaction of markers exhibiting Source-Place polysemy is unidirectional, in the sense that none of these markers was originally\\n used to encode Place alone. Theoretical implications of the study are discussed and directions for future research are\\n suggested.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constructions and Frames\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00011.GEO\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constructions and Frames","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/CF.00011.GEO","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

本文在框架语义范式下研究了荷马语和古希腊语中运动的来源和目的的不对称行为。特别是,基于涵盖四种文本类型的26部作品的语料库,研究表明:(a)无论其语义类别如何,运动动词与源动词相比,都表现出对目标路径的偏好;(b) 动词所属的框架只在一定程度上影响所选路径的类型,而不会改变源目标的不平衡;(c) 语义不一致的动-动-路组合自然不如全等组合频繁,但在不一致组合类别中,表征的分布方式反映了目标的普遍性;(d) Goal编码的标记数量高于Source;以及(e)源和目标标记与地点标记以不对称的方式相互作用:目标标记用于编码地点,类似地,地点标记用于表达目标。相反,表现出源地点多义的标记之间的相互作用是单向的,因为这些标记最初都不是单独用于编码地点的。讨论了该研究的理论意义,并提出了未来研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry
This paper investigates the asymmetrical behavior of Sources and Goals of motion in Homeric and Classical Greek within the frame semantics paradigm. In particular, based on a corpus of 26 works covering four text types, it is shown that (a) regardless of their semantic class, motion verbs display preference for Goal paths compared to Source ones; (b) the frame that a verb belongs to affects the type of path chosen only to a certain degree that does not change the Source-Goal imbalance; (c) semantically incongruent motion verb – path combinations are naturally less frequent than congruent combinations, but within the category of incongruent combinations the tokens are distributed in a way that reflects the prevalence of Goals; (d) the number of markers for the encoding of Goal is higher than that of Source; and (e) Source and Goal markers interact with Place ones in an asymmetrical way: Goal markers come to encode Place and, similarly, Place markers come to express Goal. Conversely, the interaction of markers exhibiting Source-Place polysemy is unidirectional, in the sense that none of these markers was originally used to encode Place alone. Theoretical implications of the study are discussed and directions for future research are suggested.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Constructions and Frames
Constructions and Frames LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信