大学退休金计划提供了代际互惠模式吗?

M. Otsuka
{"title":"大学退休金计划提供了代际互惠模式吗?","authors":"M. Otsuka","doi":"10.31389/lseppr.42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes the case that, as an open, ongoing defined benefit (DB) pension scheme, the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) once provided a model of reciprocity between generations but no longer does. It begins with an account of the defined contribution (DC) scheme which preceded USS and its investment risk and relatively low pension income that USS was created to rectify. It shows how the funding, investment, and valuation of USS during its first two decades provided a simple and sustainable model of reciprocity, involving the pooling among generations of the investment risk of growth assets. USS’s subsequent shift, however, out of growth assets and into bonds, and the rise in contributions to pay for this shift, have led to an unfair imposition of the cost of securing past pension promises upon current and future generations. This has occurred even though such a shift has been advocated on grounds of intergenerational fairness. A closure of DB and a move back to 100% DC would exacerbate the inequality between generations. JEL codes: D63, G22, J14, J32","PeriodicalId":93332,"journal":{"name":"LSE public policy review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the Universities Superannuation Scheme Provide a Model of Reciprocity Between Generations?\",\"authors\":\"M. Otsuka\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/lseppr.42\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article makes the case that, as an open, ongoing defined benefit (DB) pension scheme, the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) once provided a model of reciprocity between generations but no longer does. It begins with an account of the defined contribution (DC) scheme which preceded USS and its investment risk and relatively low pension income that USS was created to rectify. It shows how the funding, investment, and valuation of USS during its first two decades provided a simple and sustainable model of reciprocity, involving the pooling among generations of the investment risk of growth assets. USS’s subsequent shift, however, out of growth assets and into bonds, and the rise in contributions to pay for this shift, have led to an unfair imposition of the cost of securing past pension promises upon current and future generations. This has occurred even though such a shift has been advocated on grounds of intergenerational fairness. A closure of DB and a move back to 100% DC would exacerbate the inequality between generations. JEL codes: D63, G22, J14, J32\",\"PeriodicalId\":93332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSE public policy review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSE public policy review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.42\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSE public policy review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/lseppr.42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一个开放的、持续的固定收益(DB)养老金计划,大学退休金计划(USS)曾经提供了代际互惠的模式,但现在不再提供了。它首先说明了在USS之前的固定缴款(DC)计划及其投资风险和相对较低的养老金收入,USS是为了纠正这一点而创建的。它展示了在最初的二十年中,美国航空公司的融资、投资和估值如何提供了一个简单而可持续的互惠模型,涉及到几代人之间的成长型资产投资风险的汇集。然而,美国随后从成长型资产转向债券,以及为实现这一转变而增加的缴款,导致了一种不公平的做法,将确保过去养老金承诺的成本强加给了当代人和子孙后代。尽管以代际公平为理由提倡这种转变,但这种情况还是发生了。关闭DB并回到100% DC将加剧代际之间的不平等。JEL代码:D63、G22、J14、J32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the Universities Superannuation Scheme Provide a Model of Reciprocity Between Generations?
This article makes the case that, as an open, ongoing defined benefit (DB) pension scheme, the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) once provided a model of reciprocity between generations but no longer does. It begins with an account of the defined contribution (DC) scheme which preceded USS and its investment risk and relatively low pension income that USS was created to rectify. It shows how the funding, investment, and valuation of USS during its first two decades provided a simple and sustainable model of reciprocity, involving the pooling among generations of the investment risk of growth assets. USS’s subsequent shift, however, out of growth assets and into bonds, and the rise in contributions to pay for this shift, have led to an unfair imposition of the cost of securing past pension promises upon current and future generations. This has occurred even though such a shift has been advocated on grounds of intergenerational fairness. A closure of DB and a move back to 100% DC would exacerbate the inequality between generations. JEL codes: D63, G22, J14, J32
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信