桥接过去:中世纪和后中世纪南华克的生活:Thameslink Borough高架桥沿线和伦敦桥车站的挖掘。

IF 0.4 3区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
R. Leech
{"title":"桥接过去:中世纪和后中世纪南华克的生活:Thameslink Borough高架桥沿线和伦敦桥车站的挖掘。","authors":"R. Leech","doi":"10.1080/00794236.2021.1978246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"going into some depth about the context and operation of different periods of investigation of Sheffield Castle and some of the individuals involved, as well as covering the site’s relationship tomore recent community archaeology initiatives. It sits alongside an online archive hosted by the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) that allows readers to engage directly with some of the material resulting from historic work on the site: (https:// archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/sheffieldcastle_uos_2020/). The extensive ‘Acknowledgements’ section is well worth looking over just to understand the effort over many years that has gone into this publication and appreciate the number of people who have been involved in the project. It’s easy enough to get the feeling that Sheffield Castle represents a key moment in the archaeology of Sheffield, especially poignant given the University’s recent decision to close down their archaeology department. After an introductory chapter setting out the known history of Sheffield Castle, Chapters 2 and 3 focus on the earlier 20th century work of Leslie Armstrong and Joseph B. Himsworth, who observed and recorded parts of the former castle that were uncovered during construction work on the castle site. Chapter 2 looks at recording methods, and the differences between the Armstrong and Himsworth archives, while Chapter 3 provides an interpretation of the site based on their work. Chapters 5 and 6 look at the mid-20th-century work of Leslie Butcher, whose fantastic recording work on site enabled finds to be considered within their stratigraphic contextfor the first time, but has also enabled reinterpretation of the earlier work of Armstrong and Himsworth. Butcher’s isometric drawings (e.g. Fig 5.31) are a highlight of the book. Chapter 7 covers the finds on the site and Chapter 8 discusses the more recent work on the site by ARCUS, a period of work whose main protagonists will be well known to many UK archaeologists. Chapter 9 widens the discussion to include the ‘lordly landscape’ of a nearby medieval deer park and hunting lodge. The excellent Chapter 10, ‘The Persistence of Place’, looks at how Sheffield Castle has remained present since its demolition in the 17th century, through street names, community projects and so on. It serves as a fascinating example of the ways that buried archaeology can have real impact on the above-ground world, the daily lives of a city and its inhabitants. The associated archive is a great partner to the published book, featuring site diaries, photographs, lecture notes and archaeological from across Sheffield Castle’s time as a site of archaeological interest. It’s well worth spending some time on the material contained within it and not solely cross-referencing from the book. Sheffield Castle is a very good publication on its own terms, but I hope it will inspire other towns and cities to pull together similar publication-archive hybrids where information is currently spread across numerous locations and often hard-to-find publications, including where nationally important archaeology is sitting unpublished except as grey literature. Finally, how great it is that this volume has been made available online for free. Surely its impact and inspiration will be much the greater for that.","PeriodicalId":43560,"journal":{"name":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","volume":"55 1","pages":"444 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the Past: Life in Medieval and Post-Medieval Southwark: Excavations along the Route of Thameslink Borough Viaduct and at London Bridge Station.\",\"authors\":\"R. Leech\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00794236.2021.1978246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"going into some depth about the context and operation of different periods of investigation of Sheffield Castle and some of the individuals involved, as well as covering the site’s relationship tomore recent community archaeology initiatives. It sits alongside an online archive hosted by the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) that allows readers to engage directly with some of the material resulting from historic work on the site: (https:// archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/sheffieldcastle_uos_2020/). The extensive ‘Acknowledgements’ section is well worth looking over just to understand the effort over many years that has gone into this publication and appreciate the number of people who have been involved in the project. It’s easy enough to get the feeling that Sheffield Castle represents a key moment in the archaeology of Sheffield, especially poignant given the University’s recent decision to close down their archaeology department. After an introductory chapter setting out the known history of Sheffield Castle, Chapters 2 and 3 focus on the earlier 20th century work of Leslie Armstrong and Joseph B. Himsworth, who observed and recorded parts of the former castle that were uncovered during construction work on the castle site. Chapter 2 looks at recording methods, and the differences between the Armstrong and Himsworth archives, while Chapter 3 provides an interpretation of the site based on their work. Chapters 5 and 6 look at the mid-20th-century work of Leslie Butcher, whose fantastic recording work on site enabled finds to be considered within their stratigraphic contextfor the first time, but has also enabled reinterpretation of the earlier work of Armstrong and Himsworth. Butcher’s isometric drawings (e.g. Fig 5.31) are a highlight of the book. Chapter 7 covers the finds on the site and Chapter 8 discusses the more recent work on the site by ARCUS, a period of work whose main protagonists will be well known to many UK archaeologists. Chapter 9 widens the discussion to include the ‘lordly landscape’ of a nearby medieval deer park and hunting lodge. The excellent Chapter 10, ‘The Persistence of Place’, looks at how Sheffield Castle has remained present since its demolition in the 17th century, through street names, community projects and so on. It serves as a fascinating example of the ways that buried archaeology can have real impact on the above-ground world, the daily lives of a city and its inhabitants. The associated archive is a great partner to the published book, featuring site diaries, photographs, lecture notes and archaeological from across Sheffield Castle’s time as a site of archaeological interest. It’s well worth spending some time on the material contained within it and not solely cross-referencing from the book. Sheffield Castle is a very good publication on its own terms, but I hope it will inspire other towns and cities to pull together similar publication-archive hybrids where information is currently spread across numerous locations and often hard-to-find publications, including where nationally important archaeology is sitting unpublished except as grey literature. Finally, how great it is that this volume has been made available online for free. Surely its impact and inspiration will be much the greater for that.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"444 - 446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Post-Medieval Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2021.1978246\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Post-Medieval Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00794236.2021.1978246","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

深入了解谢菲尔德城堡不同时期调查的背景和操作以及一些相关人员,并涵盖该遗址与最近社区考古活动的关系。它与考古数据服务(ADS)托管的在线档案馆放在一起,读者可以直接接触该网站历史工作产生的一些材料:(https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/sheffinieldcastle_uos_2020/)。广泛的“致谢”部分非常值得一看,只是为了了解本出版物多年来所做的努力,并感谢参与该项目的人数。人们很容易感觉到谢菲尔德城堡代表着谢菲尔德考古的一个关键时刻,尤其是考虑到该大学最近决定关闭其考古系,这一点令人心酸。在介绍了谢菲尔德城堡的已知历史后,第2章和第3章重点介绍了20世纪早期莱斯利·阿姆斯特朗和约瑟夫·B·希姆斯沃斯的作品,他们观察并记录了城堡遗址施工过程中发现的前城堡部分。第2章介绍了记录方法,以及阿姆斯特朗和海姆斯沃斯档案之间的差异,而第3章则根据他们的工作对该遗址进行了解释。第5章和第6章着眼于20世纪中期莱斯利·布彻的作品,他在现场出色的记录工作使这些发现首次被纳入其地层背景,但也使阿姆斯特朗和希姆斯沃斯的早期作品得以重新解释。布彻的等角图(如图5.31)是本书的亮点。第7章介绍了该遗址的发现,第8章讨论了ARCUS在该遗址的最新工作,这一时期的主要主人公将为许多英国考古学家所熟知。第9章扩大了讨论范围,包括附近中世纪鹿公园和狩猎小屋的“壮丽景观”。优秀的第10章“地方的持久性”通过街道名称、社区项目等,探讨了谢菲尔德城堡自17世纪被拆除以来是如何一直存在的。它是一个引人入胜的例子,说明了埋藏考古如何对地上世界、城市及其居民的日常生活产生真正的影响。相关档案馆是出版的这本书的绝佳合作伙伴,收录了谢菲尔德城堡时期的遗址日记、照片、讲义和考古资料。值得花点时间在书中所包含的材料上,而不仅仅是书中的交叉引用。就其本身而言,《谢菲尔德城堡》是一本非常好的出版物,但我希望它能激励其他城镇将类似的出版物档案混合在一起,这些出版物的信息目前分布在许多地方,而且往往很难找到出版物,包括除灰色文献外,全国重要考古尚未出版的地方。最后,这本书在网上免费提供,真是太棒了。毫无疑问,它的影响力和灵感将更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the Past: Life in Medieval and Post-Medieval Southwark: Excavations along the Route of Thameslink Borough Viaduct and at London Bridge Station.
going into some depth about the context and operation of different periods of investigation of Sheffield Castle and some of the individuals involved, as well as covering the site’s relationship tomore recent community archaeology initiatives. It sits alongside an online archive hosted by the Archaeology Data Service (ADS) that allows readers to engage directly with some of the material resulting from historic work on the site: (https:// archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archives/view/sheffieldcastle_uos_2020/). The extensive ‘Acknowledgements’ section is well worth looking over just to understand the effort over many years that has gone into this publication and appreciate the number of people who have been involved in the project. It’s easy enough to get the feeling that Sheffield Castle represents a key moment in the archaeology of Sheffield, especially poignant given the University’s recent decision to close down their archaeology department. After an introductory chapter setting out the known history of Sheffield Castle, Chapters 2 and 3 focus on the earlier 20th century work of Leslie Armstrong and Joseph B. Himsworth, who observed and recorded parts of the former castle that were uncovered during construction work on the castle site. Chapter 2 looks at recording methods, and the differences between the Armstrong and Himsworth archives, while Chapter 3 provides an interpretation of the site based on their work. Chapters 5 and 6 look at the mid-20th-century work of Leslie Butcher, whose fantastic recording work on site enabled finds to be considered within their stratigraphic contextfor the first time, but has also enabled reinterpretation of the earlier work of Armstrong and Himsworth. Butcher’s isometric drawings (e.g. Fig 5.31) are a highlight of the book. Chapter 7 covers the finds on the site and Chapter 8 discusses the more recent work on the site by ARCUS, a period of work whose main protagonists will be well known to many UK archaeologists. Chapter 9 widens the discussion to include the ‘lordly landscape’ of a nearby medieval deer park and hunting lodge. The excellent Chapter 10, ‘The Persistence of Place’, looks at how Sheffield Castle has remained present since its demolition in the 17th century, through street names, community projects and so on. It serves as a fascinating example of the ways that buried archaeology can have real impact on the above-ground world, the daily lives of a city and its inhabitants. The associated archive is a great partner to the published book, featuring site diaries, photographs, lecture notes and archaeological from across Sheffield Castle’s time as a site of archaeological interest. It’s well worth spending some time on the material contained within it and not solely cross-referencing from the book. Sheffield Castle is a very good publication on its own terms, but I hope it will inspire other towns and cities to pull together similar publication-archive hybrids where information is currently spread across numerous locations and often hard-to-find publications, including where nationally important archaeology is sitting unpublished except as grey literature. Finally, how great it is that this volume has been made available online for free. Surely its impact and inspiration will be much the greater for that.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信