世卫组织在2021年COVID - 19疫苗接种运动初期在社交媒体上的沟通战略

IF 1.3 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Santana Lois Poch-But, Á. Moreno, Roberto Gelado-Marcos
{"title":"世卫组织在2021年COVID - 19疫苗接种运动初期在社交媒体上的沟通战略","authors":"Santana Lois Poch-But, Á. Moreno, Roberto Gelado-Marcos","doi":"10.26441/rc22.1-2022-3102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The crisis caused by COVID-19 forced public and private actors to deploy various strategies on social media to communicate effectively with their public. This research analyses the institutional communication of the World Health Organization’s Twitter account during the first quarter of 2021, with the aim of shedding light on their strategy and analyzing both its strengths and the areas with room for improvement in a crisis like the one studied. For this purpose, an ethnographic content analysis was run on the tweets published by the institutional account of the WHO and the responses issued by the public. A computer-assisted analysis was undertaken through two software programs (SPSS 27 and NVivo 11), and an online tool, Onodo – that helped us develop a sociogram with the different relationships between the actors involved in the crisis and risk communication of the WHO around the subject of vaccination. The main results show, on the one hand, that vaccination is not the focal point of the WHO’s discourse at a time when the public’s interest was centered on said thematic axis, and on the other, that the organization was not able to create an effective dialogic space. Considering these findings, a reflection is encouraged to optimize professional praxis in future risk and crisis communication strategies in digital environments, expanding the scope of this study towards other organizations and/or time frames.","PeriodicalId":52027,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Comunicacion-Peru","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The WHO’s communication strategies on social media during the early stage of the 2021 COVID vaccination campaign\",\"authors\":\"Santana Lois Poch-But, Á. Moreno, Roberto Gelado-Marcos\",\"doi\":\"10.26441/rc22.1-2022-3102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The crisis caused by COVID-19 forced public and private actors to deploy various strategies on social media to communicate effectively with their public. This research analyses the institutional communication of the World Health Organization’s Twitter account during the first quarter of 2021, with the aim of shedding light on their strategy and analyzing both its strengths and the areas with room for improvement in a crisis like the one studied. For this purpose, an ethnographic content analysis was run on the tweets published by the institutional account of the WHO and the responses issued by the public. A computer-assisted analysis was undertaken through two software programs (SPSS 27 and NVivo 11), and an online tool, Onodo – that helped us develop a sociogram with the different relationships between the actors involved in the crisis and risk communication of the WHO around the subject of vaccination. The main results show, on the one hand, that vaccination is not the focal point of the WHO’s discourse at a time when the public’s interest was centered on said thematic axis, and on the other, that the organization was not able to create an effective dialogic space. Considering these findings, a reflection is encouraged to optimize professional praxis in future risk and crisis communication strategies in digital environments, expanding the scope of this study towards other organizations and/or time frames.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Comunicacion-Peru\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Comunicacion-Peru\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26441/rc22.1-2022-3102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Comunicacion-Peru","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26441/rc22.1-2022-3102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

COVID-19引发的危机迫使公共和私营行为体在社交媒体上部署各种策略,以便与公众进行有效沟通。本研究分析了世界卫生组织Twitter账户在2021年第一季度的机构沟通情况,旨在揭示其战略,并分析其优势和在研究的危机中需要改进的领域。为此,对世卫组织机构账号发布的推文和公众发布的回应进行了民族志内容分析。通过两个软件程序(SPSS 27和NVivo 11)和在线工具Onodo进行了计算机辅助分析,这帮助我们建立了一个社会关系图,其中包括参与危机的行动者之间的不同关系以及世卫组织围绕疫苗接种主题的风险沟通。主要结果表明,一方面,当公众的兴趣集中在上述主题轴上时,疫苗接种不是世卫组织讨论的焦点,另一方面,该组织无法创造一个有效的对话空间。考虑到这些发现,鼓励反思在数字环境中优化未来风险和危机沟通策略的专业实践,将本研究的范围扩展到其他组织和/或时间框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The WHO’s communication strategies on social media during the early stage of the 2021 COVID vaccination campaign
The crisis caused by COVID-19 forced public and private actors to deploy various strategies on social media to communicate effectively with their public. This research analyses the institutional communication of the World Health Organization’s Twitter account during the first quarter of 2021, with the aim of shedding light on their strategy and analyzing both its strengths and the areas with room for improvement in a crisis like the one studied. For this purpose, an ethnographic content analysis was run on the tweets published by the institutional account of the WHO and the responses issued by the public. A computer-assisted analysis was undertaken through two software programs (SPSS 27 and NVivo 11), and an online tool, Onodo – that helped us develop a sociogram with the different relationships between the actors involved in the crisis and risk communication of the WHO around the subject of vaccination. The main results show, on the one hand, that vaccination is not the focal point of the WHO’s discourse at a time when the public’s interest was centered on said thematic axis, and on the other, that the organization was not able to create an effective dialogic space. Considering these findings, a reflection is encouraged to optimize professional praxis in future risk and crisis communication strategies in digital environments, expanding the scope of this study towards other organizations and/or time frames.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Comunicación is an academic journal of the School of Communication of the Universidad de Piura. The publication aims to disseminate material of high theoretical, philosophical, methodological and empirical quality, on issues of communication developed in both the academic and professional field. The editorial criterion that leads the publication is the knowledge acquired through research on communication issues and their practice. The content and selection criteria of the articles in the publication agree with the purposes that inspire the Guiding Principles of the Universidad de Piura. It is aimed at academics, scientists, information professionals, the communication industry, and students of Communication Faculties. Revista de Comunicación is a non-profit project. It does not pay the authors, nor does it charge for the costs of processing the articles and nor for their publication. The journal provides immediate Open Access to its printed and digital content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信