满足老年人和残疾人的低收入住房需求:俄亥俄州低收入住房税收抵免居民的分析

Q2 Social Sciences

Housing and Society Pub Date : 2020-07-07 DOI:10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940

Katherine F. Fallon, Cody R. Price

{"title":"满足老年人和残疾人的低收入住房需求:俄亥俄州低收入住房税收抵免居民的分析","authors":"Katherine F. Fallon, Cody R. Price","doi":"10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the preferences, satisfaction, and perceived ability to age in place for 633 Ohioans living in housing subsidized by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. Using resident responses to a survey, we examine how these items may vary by age and disability status. While all residents prioritize affordability and safety, other preferences vary by age and mobility disability. All residents show high levels of satisfaction with both housing and neighborhood components, however, senior citizens demonstrate higher overall housing satisfaction and perceived ability to age in place. This paper highlights the challenges for affordability and accessibility for residents in developments subsidized by the LIHTC program, despite age or disability status, but argues that age and mobility disability should be considered when designing LIHTC housing.","PeriodicalId":52110,"journal":{"name":"Housing and Society","volume":"47 1","pages":"244 - 268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meeting the needs of low-income housing for senior and disabled populations: an analysis of low-income housing tax credit residents in Ohio\",\"authors\":\"Katherine F. Fallon, Cody R. Price\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article examines the preferences, satisfaction, and perceived ability to age in place for 633 Ohioans living in housing subsidized by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. Using resident responses to a survey, we examine how these items may vary by age and disability status. While all residents prioritize affordability and safety, other preferences vary by age and mobility disability. All residents show high levels of satisfaction with both housing and neighborhood components, however, senior citizens demonstrate higher overall housing satisfaction and perceived ability to age in place. This paper highlights the challenges for affordability and accessibility for residents in developments subsidized by the LIHTC program, despite age or disability status, but argues that age and mobility disability should be considered when designing LIHTC housing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Housing and Society\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"244 - 268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Housing and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Housing and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1783940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文调查了633名居住在低收入住房税收抵免（LIHTC）计划补贴住房中的俄亥俄州人的偏好、满意度和适老化能力。通过居民对调查的回答，我们研究了这些项目如何因年龄和残疾状况而变化。虽然所有居民都优先考虑负担能力和安全，但其他偏好因年龄和行动不便而异。所有居民对住房和社区组成部分都表现出较高的满意度，然而，老年人对住房的总体满意度和就地养老的感知能力更高。本文强调了在LIHTC计划补贴的开发项目中，无论年龄或残疾状况如何，居民的负担能力和无障碍性都面临挑战，但认为在设计LIHTC住房时应考虑年龄和行动不便。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Meeting the needs of low-income housing for senior and disabled populations: an analysis of low-income housing tax credit residents in Ohio

ABSTRACT This article examines the preferences, satisfaction, and perceived ability to age in place for 633 Ohioans living in housing subsidized by the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. Using resident responses to a survey, we examine how these items may vary by age and disability status. While all residents prioritize affordability and safety, other preferences vary by age and mobility disability. All residents show high levels of satisfaction with both housing and neighborhood components, however, senior citizens demonstrate higher overall housing satisfaction and perceived ability to age in place. This paper highlights the challenges for affordability and accessibility for residents in developments subsidized by the LIHTC program, despite age or disability status, but argues that age and mobility disability should be considered when designing LIHTC housing.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Housing and Society Social Sciences-Urban Studies

CiteScore

2.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Housing and Society is the journal of the Housing Education and Research Association (HERA). The journal supports the mission of HERA by providing for the dissemination of research and other scholarly work. Submissions from a broad range of perspectives are encouraged. Topics in housing include: policy, design, social aspects, gerontology, behavioral aspects, energy/environment, equipment, interiors, economics, theory/model development, education, and program development or evaluation. The journal welcomes the submission of original research articles, notes and commentaries. Notes are shorter manuscripts presenting succinct information on housing related to one of the following categories: - Research: exploratory or not heavily theory-based or statistically analyzed - Academic: innovative teaching ideas - Program: development, implementation, and/or evaluation of Cooperative Extension or other housing programming efforts - Policy: examination of policy impact, comparative analysis, and/or need to achieve housing goals - Reviews: books, documentaries, etc.