概念化YouTube上的真相社区

Q2 Social Sciences
Patricia G. Lange
{"title":"概念化YouTube上的真相社区","authors":"Patricia G. Lange","doi":"10.1386/EME_00071_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commentary on YouTube has been characterized as a ‘cesspool’. Yet, participants with divergent opinions do post comments to exchange ideas and share information. This study analyses comments posted to a video about YouTube community to investigate the site’s potential for knowledge exploration. The study analyses whether commentary dynamics exhibit those found in prior scholars’ rubric of a community of truth. This model rejects hierarchical forms of learning and advocates sincere information sharing and evaluation. The article argues that certain strands of media ecology scholarship are commensurate with the principles of a community of truth, in which knowledge seekers deploy digital environments to collectively explore a subject of inquiry – in this case the potential for establishing a YouTube community. Such a knowledge subject does not exist as a pre-defined object in the world but rather emerges through digital interaction that channels the subject’s desires about its ideal form through YouTube comments.","PeriodicalId":36155,"journal":{"name":"Explorations in Media Ecology","volume":"20 1","pages":"33-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing communities of truth on YouTube\",\"authors\":\"Patricia G. Lange\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/EME_00071_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Commentary on YouTube has been characterized as a ‘cesspool’. Yet, participants with divergent opinions do post comments to exchange ideas and share information. This study analyses comments posted to a video about YouTube community to investigate the site’s potential for knowledge exploration. The study analyses whether commentary dynamics exhibit those found in prior scholars’ rubric of a community of truth. This model rejects hierarchical forms of learning and advocates sincere information sharing and evaluation. The article argues that certain strands of media ecology scholarship are commensurate with the principles of a community of truth, in which knowledge seekers deploy digital environments to collectively explore a subject of inquiry – in this case the potential for establishing a YouTube community. Such a knowledge subject does not exist as a pre-defined object in the world but rather emerges through digital interaction that channels the subject’s desires about its ideal form through YouTube comments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Explorations in Media Ecology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"33-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Explorations in Media Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/EME_00071_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Explorations in Media Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/EME_00071_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

YouTube上的评论被形容为“污水池”。然而,持不同意见的参与者确实会发表评论来交换意见和分享信息。本研究分析了YouTube社区的视频评论,以调查该网站在知识探索方面的潜力。该研究分析了评论动态是否表现出先前学者对真理共同体的定义。这种模式拒绝分层学习形式,提倡真诚的信息共享和评估。这篇文章认为,媒体生态学术的某些分支与真理社区的原则是相称的,在真理社区中,知识追求者利用数字环境共同探索一个探究的主题——在这种情况下,建立一个YouTube社区的潜力。这样的知识主体并不是作为一个预先定义的对象存在于世界上,而是通过数字交互出现,通过YouTube评论引导主体对其理想形式的渴望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptualizing communities of truth on YouTube
Commentary on YouTube has been characterized as a ‘cesspool’. Yet, participants with divergent opinions do post comments to exchange ideas and share information. This study analyses comments posted to a video about YouTube community to investigate the site’s potential for knowledge exploration. The study analyses whether commentary dynamics exhibit those found in prior scholars’ rubric of a community of truth. This model rejects hierarchical forms of learning and advocates sincere information sharing and evaluation. The article argues that certain strands of media ecology scholarship are commensurate with the principles of a community of truth, in which knowledge seekers deploy digital environments to collectively explore a subject of inquiry – in this case the potential for establishing a YouTube community. Such a knowledge subject does not exist as a pre-defined object in the world but rather emerges through digital interaction that channels the subject’s desires about its ideal form through YouTube comments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Explorations in Media Ecology
Explorations in Media Ecology Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信