既不押韵也不讲道理？理解今天的科学评估

IF 1.9 4区社会学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1177/05390184211025205

P. Wagner

{"title":"既不押韵也不讲道理？理解今天的科学评估","authors":"P. Wagner","doi":"10.1177/05390184211025205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After illustrating by comparison why large segments of the current practices of science evaluation should be seen as absurd in procedure or outcome and often in both, this contribution asks why these practices have emerged in the first place and why they persist despite widespread criticism.","PeriodicalId":47697,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","volume":"60 1","pages":"378 - 383"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/05390184211025205","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neither rhyme nor reason? Understanding science evaluation today\",\"authors\":\"P. Wagner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/05390184211025205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After illustrating by comparison why large segments of the current practices of science evaluation should be seen as absurd in procedure or outcome and often in both, this contribution asks why these practices have emerged in the first place and why they persist despite widespread criticism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"378 - 383\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/05390184211025205\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211025205\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211025205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在通过比较说明了为什么当前科学评估的大部分实践在程序或结果上都应该被视为荒谬，而且往往在两者中都是荒谬的之后，这篇文章提出了为什么这些实践一开始就出现了，为什么尽管受到了广泛的批评，但它们仍然存在。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Neither rhyme nor reason? Understanding science evaluation today

After illustrating by comparison why large segments of the current practices of science evaluation should be seen as absurd in procedure or outcome and often in both, this contribution asks why these practices have emerged in the first place and why they persist despite widespread criticism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Science Information is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences at large with special focus on theoretical debates, methodology and comparative and (particularly) cross-cultural research.