DSS结肠炎模型在诺里异博尔丁毒理学评价中的应用

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Mincong Huang, Jie Su, Zhaohuan Lou, Feng Xie, W. Pan, Zhengbiao Yang, Liqiang Gu, Fang Xie, Zhiwei Xu, Lili Zhang, Fang Liu, Huimin Lai, Lijiang Zhang, Nengming Lin
{"title":"DSS结肠炎模型在诺里异博尔丁毒理学评价中的应用","authors":"Mincong Huang, Jie Su, Zhaohuan Lou, Feng Xie, W. Pan, Zhengbiao Yang, Liqiang Gu, Fang Xie, Zhiwei Xu, Lili Zhang, Fang Liu, Huimin Lai, Lijiang Zhang, Nengming Lin","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In standard nonclinical drug safety evaluation studies, limitations exist in predicting the clinical risk of a drug based only on data from healthy animals. To obtain more comprehensive toxicological information on norisoboldine (NOR), we conducted an exploratory study using C57BL/6 mice in addition to healthy mice as models of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis to evaluate the safety of NOR. The healthy mice and DSS colitis mice were exposed to 30 or 90 mg NOR/kg body weight or water for 15 days. Compared with the model control group, 90 mg/kg of NOR aggravated the symptoms and colonic lesions of the DSS colitis mice and even caused death in two animals. No significant adverse effects were observed in the healthy mice. These different toxic reactions to NOR in the healthy and DSS colitis mice indicate that NOR toxicity varies by status among animals and suggests that the DSS colitis mouse model may be more susceptible, accurate and comprehensive in evaluating the safety of NOR. In conclusion, 90 mg/kg of NOR may be safe for healthy mice but not for DSS colitis mice. The DSS colitis mouse model, with many features similar to those of human colitis patients, may be a novel choice to counteract the deficiencies of using healthy mice to evaluate the safety of anti-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) drugs, and further research is required.","PeriodicalId":49117,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":"30 1","pages":"107 - 114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of a DSS colitis model in toxicologically assessing norisoboldine\",\"authors\":\"Mincong Huang, Jie Su, Zhaohuan Lou, Feng Xie, W. Pan, Zhengbiao Yang, Liqiang Gu, Fang Xie, Zhiwei Xu, Lili Zhang, Fang Liu, Huimin Lai, Lijiang Zhang, Nengming Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In standard nonclinical drug safety evaluation studies, limitations exist in predicting the clinical risk of a drug based only on data from healthy animals. To obtain more comprehensive toxicological information on norisoboldine (NOR), we conducted an exploratory study using C57BL/6 mice in addition to healthy mice as models of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis to evaluate the safety of NOR. The healthy mice and DSS colitis mice were exposed to 30 or 90 mg NOR/kg body weight or water for 15 days. Compared with the model control group, 90 mg/kg of NOR aggravated the symptoms and colonic lesions of the DSS colitis mice and even caused death in two animals. No significant adverse effects were observed in the healthy mice. These different toxic reactions to NOR in the healthy and DSS colitis mice indicate that NOR toxicity varies by status among animals and suggests that the DSS colitis mouse model may be more susceptible, accurate and comprehensive in evaluating the safety of NOR. In conclusion, 90 mg/kg of NOR may be safe for healthy mice but not for DSS colitis mice. The DSS colitis mouse model, with many features similar to those of human colitis patients, may be a novel choice to counteract the deficiencies of using healthy mice to evaluate the safety of anti-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) drugs, and further research is required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49117,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2019.1669242","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要在标准的非临床药物安全性评估研究中,仅根据健康动物的数据预测药物的临床风险存在局限性。为了获得更全面的去甲异Boldine(NOR)毒理学信息,我们使用C57BL/6小鼠和健康小鼠作为右旋糖酐硫酸钠(DSS)结肠炎模型进行了一项探索性研究,以评估NOR的安全性。健康小鼠和DSS结肠炎小鼠暴露于30或90 mg NOR/kg体重或水15天。与模型对照组相比,90 mg/kg的NOR加重DSS结肠炎小鼠的症状和结肠损伤,甚至导致两只动物死亡。在健康小鼠中未观察到显著的不良反应。健康和DSS结肠炎小鼠对NOR的这些不同毒性反应表明,NOR毒性因动物状态而异,并表明DSS结肠炎小鼠模型在评估NOR的安全性方面可能更敏感、更准确、更全面。总之,90 mg/kg的NOR可能对健康小鼠是安全的,但对DSS结肠炎小鼠不是。DSS结肠炎小鼠模型具有许多与人类结肠炎患者相似的特征,可能是一种新的选择,以弥补使用健康小鼠评估抗炎性肠病(IBD)药物安全性的不足,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of a DSS colitis model in toxicologically assessing norisoboldine
Abstract In standard nonclinical drug safety evaluation studies, limitations exist in predicting the clinical risk of a drug based only on data from healthy animals. To obtain more comprehensive toxicological information on norisoboldine (NOR), we conducted an exploratory study using C57BL/6 mice in addition to healthy mice as models of dextran sodium sulfate (DSS) colitis to evaluate the safety of NOR. The healthy mice and DSS colitis mice were exposed to 30 or 90 mg NOR/kg body weight or water for 15 days. Compared with the model control group, 90 mg/kg of NOR aggravated the symptoms and colonic lesions of the DSS colitis mice and even caused death in two animals. No significant adverse effects were observed in the healthy mice. These different toxic reactions to NOR in the healthy and DSS colitis mice indicate that NOR toxicity varies by status among animals and suggests that the DSS colitis mouse model may be more susceptible, accurate and comprehensive in evaluating the safety of NOR. In conclusion, 90 mg/kg of NOR may be safe for healthy mice but not for DSS colitis mice. The DSS colitis mouse model, with many features similar to those of human colitis patients, may be a novel choice to counteract the deficiencies of using healthy mice to evaluate the safety of anti-inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) drugs, and further research is required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信