- Book学术

发布求助

文献互助智能选刊最新文献

IF 0.2 4区哲学 0 RELIGION

SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-05-16 DOI:10.1017/s0036930623000200

C. Blomberg

{"title":"R. B. Jamieson and Tyler R. Wittman, Biblical Reasoning: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022), pp. xxvi + 289. $29.99","authors":"C. Blomberg","doi":"10.1017/s0036930623000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A book titled Biblical Reasoning piques one ’ s interest about its contents. Will it describe forms of rhetoric or techniques of persuasion? The subtitle suggests something different: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis . Ah, this may be a contribution to the theological interpretation of Scripture, focusing perhaps on how much of Jesus and the Spirit we should look for in the Old Testament. The introduction does not at first disabuse one of either notion but suggests something much broader: the goal is ‘ to assemble a toolkit … to enable better exegesis ’ , with the ultimate end of seeing God (p. xvii). The co-authors have their doctorates in New Testament from Cambridge (Jamieson) and systematic theology from St. Andrews (Wittman). Jamieson is associate pastor of Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, DC, while Wittman is assistant professor of theology at New Orleans Baptist Seminary in Louisiana. Wittman is the primary author of chapters 1 – 6; Jamieson, of the introduction and chapters 7 – 10. Not surprisingly, they hope to bridge the divide that often separates their disciplines, convincing each ‘ side ’ that they need more of the other. What the book actually provides is quite different from an exegetical toolkit. The two main foci of the volume boil down to the need for seeing God as the end goal of Scripture study and for recognising that God as the Christian Trinity. The authors neither affirm nor deny they are practicing the theological interpretation of Scripture, claiming that the label has no relevance for them. Throughout the book, they present seven principles that yield ten rules for exegetical practice that are elaborated and/or defended in nine chapters, with a tenth chapter ‘ putting the rule-kit to work ’ in ‘ reading John 5:17 – 30 ’ (p. 213). The principles involve affirming the inspiration of Scripture as part of God ’ s wise pedagogy","PeriodicalId":44026,"journal":{"name":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","volume":"76 1","pages":"303 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0036930623000200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

一本名为《圣经推理》的书激起了人们对其内容的兴趣。它会描述修辞形式还是说服技巧？副标题暗示了一些不同的东西：基督论和三位一体的注释规则。啊，这可能是对圣经神学解释的贡献，也许集中在我们应该在旧约中寻找多少耶稣和圣灵。引言一开始并没有否定这两个概念中的任何一个，但暗示了更广泛的东西：目标是“组装一个工具包……以实现更好的注释”，最终目的是看到上帝（第xvii页）。合著者拥有剑桥大学（Jamieson）的《新约》博士学位和圣安德鲁斯大学（Wittman）的系统神学博士学位。Jamieson是华盛顿特区国会山浸信会的副牧师，而Wittman是路易斯安那州新奥尔良浸信会神学院的神学助理教授。Wittman是第1-6章的主要作者；Jamieson，引言和第7-10章。毫不奇怪，他们希望弥合经常将他们的学科分开的分歧，让每一方都相信他们需要更多的另一方。这本书实际提供的内容与训诫工具包大不相同。这本书的两个主要焦点可以归结为需要将上帝视为圣经研究的最终目标，以及承认上帝是基督教的三位一体。作者既不肯定也不否认他们正在实践圣经的神学解释，声称这个标签与他们无关。在整本书中，他们提出了七条原则，为训诫实践提供了十条规则，这些规则在九章中进行了阐述和/或辩护，第十章在“阅读约翰福音5:17-30”（第213页）中“将规则套件付诸实践”。这些原则包括肯定圣经的启示，作为上帝智慧教育的一部分

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

R. B. Jamieson and Tyler R. Wittman, Biblical Reasoning: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2022), pp. xxvi + 289. $29.99

A book titled Biblical Reasoning piques one ’ s interest about its contents. Will it describe forms of rhetoric or techniques of persuasion? The subtitle suggests something different: Christological and Trinitarian Rules for Exegesis . Ah, this may be a contribution to the theological interpretation of Scripture, focusing perhaps on how much of Jesus and the Spirit we should look for in the Old Testament. The introduction does not at first disabuse one of either notion but suggests something much broader: the goal is ‘ to assemble a toolkit … to enable better exegesis ’ , with the ultimate end of seeing God (p. xvii). The co-authors have their doctorates in New Testament from Cambridge (Jamieson) and systematic theology from St. Andrews (Wittman). Jamieson is associate pastor of Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, DC, while Wittman is assistant professor of theology at New Orleans Baptist Seminary in Louisiana. Wittman is the primary author of chapters 1 – 6; Jamieson, of the introduction and chapters 7 – 10. Not surprisingly, they hope to bridge the divide that often separates their disciplines, convincing each ‘ side ’ that they need more of the other. What the book actually provides is quite different from an exegetical toolkit. The two main foci of the volume boil down to the need for seeing God as the end goal of Scripture study and for recognising that God as the Christian Trinity. The authors neither affirm nor deny they are practicing the theological interpretation of Scripture, claiming that the label has no relevance for them. Throughout the book, they present seven principles that yield ten rules for exegetical practice that are elaborated and/or defended in nine chapters, with a tenth chapter ‘ putting the rule-kit to work ’ in ‘ reading John 5:17 – 30 ’ (p. 213). The principles involve affirming the inspiration of Scripture as part of God ’ s wise pedagogy

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量