Sanele E Mhlongo, T. Naidoo, Bongumusa S Makhathini
{"title":"子宫内膜癌术前子宫内膜取样与子宫切除术诊断的差异","authors":"Sanele E Mhlongo, T. Naidoo, Bongumusa S Makhathini","doi":"10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017. Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively. Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.","PeriodicalId":41638,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","volume":"12 1","pages":"13 - 16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and hysterectomy diagnosis in endometrial cancer\",\"authors\":\"Sanele E Mhlongo, T. Naidoo, Bongumusa S Makhathini\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017. Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively. Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"13 - 16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Gynaecological Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20742835.2020.1754659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Discrepancy between preoperative endometrial sampling and hysterectomy diagnosis in endometrial cancer
Background: A study was conducted to determine the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling histology type and tumour grade results compared with the final postoperative diagnosis. Methods: This was a retrospective chart audit of patients with endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia admitted to Grey’s Hospital in Pietermaritzburg, South Africa, from January 2013 to December 2017. Results: Sixty patients met the inclusion criteria. For endometrial cancer histological types, the accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling was 94.7% (36/38) for endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 42.9% (3/7) for serous papillary carcinoma, 85.7% (6/7) for carcinosarcoma and 75% (9/12) for atypical hyperplasia. A kappa value of 0.825 was obtained with a p-value of 0.000 for agreement between preoperative endometrial sampling and the final postoperative diagnosis. For endometrioid adenocarcinoma tumour grading 1–3 (G1–3), only 16/38 (42.1%) patients met the criteria to compare the pre- and postoperative results, which were as follows: of the eight patients with grade 1 tumour on preoperative sampling one patient (1.25%) was upgraded to grade 2 tumour postoperatively. There were no changes in tumour grading for grade 2 and 3 tumours, 3/3 and 5/5 respectively. Conclusion: Our study results for endometrioid adenocarcinoma are comparable to previous literature. However, there were significant discrepancies for non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Deficiencies that need to be addressed by laboratories in order to improve both preoperative surgical staging and postoperative adjuvant therapy planning were also highlighted.