优质传统咖啡中非挥发性化学物质的提取

IF 1.1 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Gabriela Alcantara, Giovanna Spíndola, W. Melchert
{"title":"优质传统咖啡中非挥发性化学物质的提取","authors":"Gabriela Alcantara, Giovanna Spíndola, W. Melchert","doi":"10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.ar-106-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coffee contains different volatile and non-volatile compounds, which are responsible for its characteristic flavor and aroma attributes. The extraction of non-volatile compounds from high-quality and traditional coffee by different methods was evaluated to determine the chemical compounds that discriminate between coffees types. Standard methods of preparing the coffee drink by consumers were evaluated. Method A corresponded to boiling water with coffee, and method B to the strained coffee method. Extraction with different solvents did not distinguish the compounds chosen as markers for coffees. In addition to being non-toxic and low-cost, water was the most suitable solvent, conforming to the principles of green chemistry while enabling direct comparison with sensory analysis. The total dissolved solids, percentage extraction, and non-volatile compounds were quantified to select the most satisfactory extraction method. The TDS value ranged from 1.7 to 3 between methods and coffee types, and the extraction percentage ranged from 25 to 45%. Significant differences in the extracts obtained using methods A and B high-quality versus traditional coffees were detected using the Student’s t-test. Although method A extracted the chemical compounds in more substantial amounts, method B was also efficient in extracting the compounds and was easily executed given its similarity to the usual way of preparing coffee beverages used by consumers. The evaluated non-volatile compounds were identified in both high-quality and traditional coffee samples. In the chosen extraction method (method B), the average concentrations in mg 100 g-1 of the sample found for the compounds were: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (11±0.5), 3,4-hydroxybenzoic acid (62±4), catechin (58±5), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (58±2), caffeine (1152±44), chlorogenic acid (598±23), caffeic acid (0.7±0.1), and gallic acid (3±0.2).","PeriodicalId":9115,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extraction of Non-Volatile Chemical Compounds in High-Quality and Traditional Coffee\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Alcantara, Giovanna Spíndola, W. Melchert\",\"doi\":\"10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.ar-106-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coffee contains different volatile and non-volatile compounds, which are responsible for its characteristic flavor and aroma attributes. The extraction of non-volatile compounds from high-quality and traditional coffee by different methods was evaluated to determine the chemical compounds that discriminate between coffees types. Standard methods of preparing the coffee drink by consumers were evaluated. Method A corresponded to boiling water with coffee, and method B to the strained coffee method. Extraction with different solvents did not distinguish the compounds chosen as markers for coffees. In addition to being non-toxic and low-cost, water was the most suitable solvent, conforming to the principles of green chemistry while enabling direct comparison with sensory analysis. The total dissolved solids, percentage extraction, and non-volatile compounds were quantified to select the most satisfactory extraction method. The TDS value ranged from 1.7 to 3 between methods and coffee types, and the extraction percentage ranged from 25 to 45%. Significant differences in the extracts obtained using methods A and B high-quality versus traditional coffees were detected using the Student’s t-test. Although method A extracted the chemical compounds in more substantial amounts, method B was also efficient in extracting the compounds and was easily executed given its similarity to the usual way of preparing coffee beverages used by consumers. The evaluated non-volatile compounds were identified in both high-quality and traditional coffee samples. In the chosen extraction method (method B), the average concentrations in mg 100 g-1 of the sample found for the compounds were: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (11±0.5), 3,4-hydroxybenzoic acid (62±4), catechin (58±5), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (58±2), caffeine (1152±44), chlorogenic acid (598±23), caffeic acid (0.7±0.1), and gallic acid (3±0.2).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.ar-106-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30744/brjac.2179-3425.ar-106-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

咖啡含有不同的挥发性和非挥发性化合物,这些化合物负责其特有的风味和香气属性。用不同的方法从优质咖啡和传统咖啡中提取非挥发性化合物,以确定区分咖啡类型的化学成分。对消费者制作咖啡饮料的标准方法进行了评价。方法A相当于用咖啡烧开水,方法B相当于过滤咖啡。不同溶剂的萃取不能区分被选为咖啡标记物的化合物。除了无毒和低成本外,水是最合适的溶剂,符合绿色化学的原则,同时可以直接与感官分析进行比较。对总溶解固形物、提取率和非挥发性化合物进行定量分析,选择最满意的提取方法。不同咖啡种类的TDS值在1.7 ~ 3之间,萃取率在25% ~ 45%之间。使用方法A和B获得的提取物与传统咖啡相比,使用学生t检验检测出高品质咖啡的显著差异。虽然方法A提取的化学成分更多,但方法B也能有效地提取这些化合物,而且由于方法B与消费者通常使用的制备咖啡饮料的方法相似,方法B也很容易执行。所评估的非挥发性化合物在高质量和传统咖啡样品中都被鉴定出来。在所选择的提取方法(方法B)中,化合物在mg 100 g-1样品中的平均浓度为:5-羟甲基糠醛(11±0.5)、3,4-羟基苯甲酸(62±4)、儿茶素(58±5)、4-羟基苯甲酸(58±2)、咖啡因(1152±44)、绿原酸(598±23)、咖啡酸(0.7±0.1)、没食子酸(3±0.2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extraction of Non-Volatile Chemical Compounds in High-Quality and Traditional Coffee
Coffee contains different volatile and non-volatile compounds, which are responsible for its characteristic flavor and aroma attributes. The extraction of non-volatile compounds from high-quality and traditional coffee by different methods was evaluated to determine the chemical compounds that discriminate between coffees types. Standard methods of preparing the coffee drink by consumers were evaluated. Method A corresponded to boiling water with coffee, and method B to the strained coffee method. Extraction with different solvents did not distinguish the compounds chosen as markers for coffees. In addition to being non-toxic and low-cost, water was the most suitable solvent, conforming to the principles of green chemistry while enabling direct comparison with sensory analysis. The total dissolved solids, percentage extraction, and non-volatile compounds were quantified to select the most satisfactory extraction method. The TDS value ranged from 1.7 to 3 between methods and coffee types, and the extraction percentage ranged from 25 to 45%. Significant differences in the extracts obtained using methods A and B high-quality versus traditional coffees were detected using the Student’s t-test. Although method A extracted the chemical compounds in more substantial amounts, method B was also efficient in extracting the compounds and was easily executed given its similarity to the usual way of preparing coffee beverages used by consumers. The evaluated non-volatile compounds were identified in both high-quality and traditional coffee samples. In the chosen extraction method (method B), the average concentrations in mg 100 g-1 of the sample found for the compounds were: 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (11±0.5), 3,4-hydroxybenzoic acid (62±4), catechin (58±5), 4-hydroxybenzoic acid (58±2), caffeine (1152±44), chlorogenic acid (598±23), caffeic acid (0.7±0.1), and gallic acid (3±0.2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: BrJAC is dedicated to the diffusion of significant and original knowledge in all branches of Analytical Chemistry, and is addressed to professionals involved in science, technology and innovation projects at universities, research centers and in industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信