为圣罗伯特·贝拉明对牺牲的定义辩护

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Christian D. Washburn
{"title":"为圣罗伯特·贝拉明对牺牲的定义辩护","authors":"Christian D. Washburn","doi":"10.1353/atp.2022.0025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:St. Robert Bellarmine's defense of the sacrificial nature of the Mass was influential for centuries. Several contemporary theologians, however, have accused Bellarmine of making a \"massive methodological mistake\" in deriving his definition of sacrifice from an examination of \"the religious cultures of the world.\" Some also allege that his definition was a theological novelty. This article argues that Bellarmine's methodology made a positive contribution to the theology of the sacrifice of the Mass. It will also refute the argument that he derived his definition of sacrifice by considering \"the religious cultures of the world.\" Moreover, the article will argue that his definition was not a theological novelty.","PeriodicalId":40281,"journal":{"name":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Defense of St. Robert Bellarmine's Definition of Sacrifice\",\"authors\":\"Christian D. Washburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/atp.2022.0025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:St. Robert Bellarmine's defense of the sacrificial nature of the Mass was influential for centuries. Several contemporary theologians, however, have accused Bellarmine of making a \\\"massive methodological mistake\\\" in deriving his definition of sacrifice from an examination of \\\"the religious cultures of the world.\\\" Some also allege that his definition was a theological novelty. This article argues that Bellarmine's methodology made a positive contribution to the theology of the sacrifice of the Mass. It will also refute the argument that he derived his definition of sacrifice by considering \\\"the religious cultures of the world.\\\" Moreover, the article will argue that his definition was not a theological novelty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2022.0025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiphon-A Journal for Liturgical Renewal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/atp.2022.0025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文摘:圣。罗伯特·贝拉明对弥撒献祭性质的辩护影响了几个世纪。然而,几位当代神学家指责贝拉明从对“世界宗教文化”的考察中得出献祭的定义,犯了一个“巨大的方法论错误”。一些人还声称他的定义是神学上的新事物。本文认为,贝拉明的方法论对弥撒献祭神学做出了积极的贡献。这也将反驳他通过考虑“世界宗教文化”而得出献祭定义的说法。此外,本文将论证他的定义并非神学上的新奇事物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Defense of St. Robert Bellarmine's Definition of Sacrifice
ABSTRACT:St. Robert Bellarmine's defense of the sacrificial nature of the Mass was influential for centuries. Several contemporary theologians, however, have accused Bellarmine of making a "massive methodological mistake" in deriving his definition of sacrifice from an examination of "the religious cultures of the world." Some also allege that his definition was a theological novelty. This article argues that Bellarmine's methodology made a positive contribution to the theology of the sacrifice of the Mass. It will also refute the argument that he derived his definition of sacrifice by considering "the religious cultures of the world." Moreover, the article will argue that his definition was not a theological novelty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信